Abstract Purpose: In the last decades, the volume of Private Equity sponsored leveraged buyout transactions has increased. A Reverse Leveraged Buyout is when the target companies that are subject to such transaction, enter public markets. Therefore, academics argue that these transactions are a unique opportunity to examine the Private Equity firms’ ability to enhance the value of the target companies. Value creation should be reflected in both stock performance and operating performance. The operating performance of Leveraged Buyouts has been widely studies, however not much attention has been made to Reverse Leveraged Buyouts. Therefore, this master thesis has the intend to contribute to whether the high leverage ratio, concentrated ownership and the value-adding mechanisms that Private Equity provides, can enhance shareholder value and operating efficiency of the target companies. Method: Based on a total sample of 5220 IPOs, that occurred between 2000 and 2016. The methods applied are event studies and regressions. The samples’ monthly abnormal returns relative to the market is calculated. The total sample is divided into three subgroups to investigate the relative performance of Reverse Leveraged Buyouts. Appropriate statistical tests are computed, to test whether these are significantly different from zero. Hereafter, to test how the target companies perform in line with market efficiency, Jensen’s alpha is calculated. An event study on operating efficiency is applied to measure abnormal operating performance. Lastly regressions on performance within the sample are made to try to find the cause of why some Reverse Leveraged Buyouts performed better than others. Findings: No clear indication of outperformance was found regarding the target companies’ stocks returns. Measuring the relative operating performance, the findings were in line with expected, according to the mechanisms described in agency theory. However, whether the cause of operating efficiency findings was Private Equity induced value-creation, effects of leverage or due to other properties is not clear. Moreover, there were no strong conclusions on why some target firms have a better stock performance than others. The only clear conclusion from this, was that the target firms with a larger market capitalization performed best.
|Educations||MSc in Applied Economics and Finance, (Graduate Programme) Final Thesis|
|Number of pages||102|