Workplace Learning in Crowdwork: Comparing Microworkers’ and Online Freelancers’ Practices

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to explore workplace learning practices within two types of crowdwork – microwork and online freelancing. Specifically, the paper scopes and compares the use of workplace learning activities (WLAs) and self-regulatory learning (SRL) strategies undertaken by microworkers (MWs) and online freelancers (OFs). We hypothesised that there may be quantitative differences in the use of WLAs and SRL strategies within these two types of crowdwork, because of the underpinning differences in the complexity of tasks and skill requirements.
Design/methodology/approach: To test this hypothesis, a questionnaire survey was carried out among crowdworkers from two crowdwork platforms – Figure Eight (microwork) and Upwork (online freelancing). Chi-square test was used to compare WLAs and SRL strategies among OFs and MWs.
Findings: Both groups use many WLAs and SRL strategies. Several significant differences were identified between the groups. In particular, moderate and moderately strong associations were uncovered, whereby OFs were more likely to report (i) undertaking free online courses/tutorials and (ii) learning by receiving feedback. In addition, significant but weak or very weak associations were identified, namely, OFs were more likely to learn by (i) collaborating with others, (ii) self-study of literature and (iii) making notes when learning. In contrast, MWs were more likely to write reflective notes on learning after the completion of work tasks, although this association was very weak.
Originality/value: The paper contributes empirical evidence in an under-researched area – workplace learning practices in crowdwork. Crowdwork is increasingly taken up across developed and developing countries. Therefore, it is important to understand the learning potential of this form of work and where the gaps and issues might be. Better understanding of crowdworkers’ learning practices could help platform providers and policymakers to shape the design of crowdwork in ways that could be beneficial to all stakeholders.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Workplace Learning
Volume31
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)250-273
Number of pages24
ISSN1366-5626
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 8. April 2019

Keywords

  • Workplace learning
  • Self-regulated learning
  • Crowdwork
  • Online freelancing
  • Microwork
  • Learning strategies
  • Learning activities
  • Learning practices

Cite this

@article{db37f2824ad54066b90d6dd0dbb300a0,
title = "Workplace Learning in Crowdwork: Comparing Microworkers’ and Online Freelancers’ Practices",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper aims to explore workplace learning practices within two types of crowdwork – microwork and online freelancing. Specifically, the paper scopes and compares the use of workplace learning activities (WLAs) and self-regulatory learning (SRL) strategies undertaken by microworkers (MWs) and online freelancers (OFs). We hypothesised that there may be quantitative differences in the use of WLAs and SRL strategies within these two types of crowdwork, because of the underpinning differences in the complexity of tasks and skill requirements.Design/methodology/approach: To test this hypothesis, a questionnaire survey was carried out among crowdworkers from two crowdwork platforms – Figure Eight (microwork) and Upwork (online freelancing). Chi-square test was used to compare WLAs and SRL strategies among OFs and MWs.Findings: Both groups use many WLAs and SRL strategies. Several significant differences were identified between the groups. In particular, moderate and moderately strong associations were uncovered, whereby OFs were more likely to report (i) undertaking free online courses/tutorials and (ii) learning by receiving feedback. In addition, significant but weak or very weak associations were identified, namely, OFs were more likely to learn by (i) collaborating with others, (ii) self-study of literature and (iii) making notes when learning. In contrast, MWs were more likely to write reflective notes on learning after the completion of work tasks, although this association was very weak.Originality/value: The paper contributes empirical evidence in an under-researched area – workplace learning practices in crowdwork. Crowdwork is increasingly taken up across developed and developing countries. Therefore, it is important to understand the learning potential of this form of work and where the gaps and issues might be. Better understanding of crowdworkers’ learning practices could help platform providers and policymakers to shape the design of crowdwork in ways that could be beneficial to all stakeholders.",
keywords = "Workplace learning, Self-regulated learning, Crowdwork, Online freelancing, Microwork, Learning strategies, Learning activities, Learning practices, Workplace learning, Self-regulated learning, Crowdwork, Online freelancing, Microwork, Learning strategies, Learning activities, Learning practices",
author = "Anoush Margaryan",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 8. April 2019",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1108/JWL-10-2018-0126",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "250--273",
journal = "Journal of Workplace Learning",
issn = "1366-5626",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "4",

}

Workplace Learning in Crowdwork : Comparing Microworkers’ and Online Freelancers’ Practices. / Margaryan, Anoush .

In: Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 31, No. 4, 08.04.2019, p. 250-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Workplace Learning in Crowdwork

T2 - Comparing Microworkers’ and Online Freelancers’ Practices

AU - Margaryan, Anoush

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 8. April 2019

PY - 2019/4/8

Y1 - 2019/4/8

N2 - Purpose: This paper aims to explore workplace learning practices within two types of crowdwork – microwork and online freelancing. Specifically, the paper scopes and compares the use of workplace learning activities (WLAs) and self-regulatory learning (SRL) strategies undertaken by microworkers (MWs) and online freelancers (OFs). We hypothesised that there may be quantitative differences in the use of WLAs and SRL strategies within these two types of crowdwork, because of the underpinning differences in the complexity of tasks and skill requirements.Design/methodology/approach: To test this hypothesis, a questionnaire survey was carried out among crowdworkers from two crowdwork platforms – Figure Eight (microwork) and Upwork (online freelancing). Chi-square test was used to compare WLAs and SRL strategies among OFs and MWs.Findings: Both groups use many WLAs and SRL strategies. Several significant differences were identified between the groups. In particular, moderate and moderately strong associations were uncovered, whereby OFs were more likely to report (i) undertaking free online courses/tutorials and (ii) learning by receiving feedback. In addition, significant but weak or very weak associations were identified, namely, OFs were more likely to learn by (i) collaborating with others, (ii) self-study of literature and (iii) making notes when learning. In contrast, MWs were more likely to write reflective notes on learning after the completion of work tasks, although this association was very weak.Originality/value: The paper contributes empirical evidence in an under-researched area – workplace learning practices in crowdwork. Crowdwork is increasingly taken up across developed and developing countries. Therefore, it is important to understand the learning potential of this form of work and where the gaps and issues might be. Better understanding of crowdworkers’ learning practices could help platform providers and policymakers to shape the design of crowdwork in ways that could be beneficial to all stakeholders.

AB - Purpose: This paper aims to explore workplace learning practices within two types of crowdwork – microwork and online freelancing. Specifically, the paper scopes and compares the use of workplace learning activities (WLAs) and self-regulatory learning (SRL) strategies undertaken by microworkers (MWs) and online freelancers (OFs). We hypothesised that there may be quantitative differences in the use of WLAs and SRL strategies within these two types of crowdwork, because of the underpinning differences in the complexity of tasks and skill requirements.Design/methodology/approach: To test this hypothesis, a questionnaire survey was carried out among crowdworkers from two crowdwork platforms – Figure Eight (microwork) and Upwork (online freelancing). Chi-square test was used to compare WLAs and SRL strategies among OFs and MWs.Findings: Both groups use many WLAs and SRL strategies. Several significant differences were identified between the groups. In particular, moderate and moderately strong associations were uncovered, whereby OFs were more likely to report (i) undertaking free online courses/tutorials and (ii) learning by receiving feedback. In addition, significant but weak or very weak associations were identified, namely, OFs were more likely to learn by (i) collaborating with others, (ii) self-study of literature and (iii) making notes when learning. In contrast, MWs were more likely to write reflective notes on learning after the completion of work tasks, although this association was very weak.Originality/value: The paper contributes empirical evidence in an under-researched area – workplace learning practices in crowdwork. Crowdwork is increasingly taken up across developed and developing countries. Therefore, it is important to understand the learning potential of this form of work and where the gaps and issues might be. Better understanding of crowdworkers’ learning practices could help platform providers and policymakers to shape the design of crowdwork in ways that could be beneficial to all stakeholders.

KW - Workplace learning

KW - Self-regulated learning

KW - Crowdwork

KW - Online freelancing

KW - Microwork

KW - Learning strategies

KW - Learning activities

KW - Learning practices

KW - Workplace learning

KW - Self-regulated learning

KW - Crowdwork

KW - Online freelancing

KW - Microwork

KW - Learning strategies

KW - Learning activities

KW - Learning practices

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=965228496004&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1108/JWL-10-2018-0126

DO - 10.1108/JWL-10-2018-0126

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 250

EP - 273

JO - Journal of Workplace Learning

JF - Journal of Workplace Learning

SN - 1366-5626

IS - 4

ER -