Women in a Men’s World: Risk Taking in an Online Card Game Community

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Analyzing a large data set from an online card game platform, a traditionally masculine environment with low female representation, we provide novel field evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Our paper complements existing laboratory experiments by studying a setting where selection into and out of the choice environment is endogenous, choices and outcomes are publicly observable and decisions are repeated over hundreds of rounds. We show that despite the possibility of sorting, imitation or learning, female players persistently choose lower risk-return profiles than men. We argue that the observed gender differences in risk taking result from true preference differences rather than a gap in skill, confidence or beliefs.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Volume158
Pages (from-to)62-89
Number of pages28
ISSN0167-2681
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Bibliographical note

Published online: 23 November 2018

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Risk preferences
  • Experience
  • Selection
  • Natural experiment

Cite this

@article{812f4a94065040ed91b96311acff4a9b,
title = "Women in a Men’s World: Risk Taking in an Online Card Game Community",
abstract = "Analyzing a large data set from an online card game platform, a traditionally masculine environment with low female representation, we provide novel field evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Our paper complements existing laboratory experiments by studying a setting where selection into and out of the choice environment is endogenous, choices and outcomes are publicly observable and decisions are repeated over hundreds of rounds. We show that despite the possibility of sorting, imitation or learning, female players persistently choose lower risk-return profiles than men. We argue that the observed gender differences in risk taking result from true preference differences rather than a gap in skill, confidence or beliefs.",
keywords = "Gender, Risk preference, Experience, Selection, Natural experiment, Gender, Risk preferences, Experience, Selection, Natural experiment",
author = "Eszter Czibor and J{\"o}rg Claussen and {Van Praag}, Mirjam",
note = "Published online: 23 November 2018",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.011",
language = "English",
volume = "158",
pages = "62--89",
journal = "Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization",
issn = "0167-2681",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Women in a Men’s World : Risk Taking in an Online Card Game Community. / Czibor, Eszter; Claussen, Jörg; Van Praag, Mirjam.

In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 158, 02.2019, p. 62-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women in a Men’s World

T2 - Risk Taking in an Online Card Game Community

AU - Czibor, Eszter

AU - Claussen, Jörg

AU - Van Praag, Mirjam

N1 - Published online: 23 November 2018

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Analyzing a large data set from an online card game platform, a traditionally masculine environment with low female representation, we provide novel field evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Our paper complements existing laboratory experiments by studying a setting where selection into and out of the choice environment is endogenous, choices and outcomes are publicly observable and decisions are repeated over hundreds of rounds. We show that despite the possibility of sorting, imitation or learning, female players persistently choose lower risk-return profiles than men. We argue that the observed gender differences in risk taking result from true preference differences rather than a gap in skill, confidence or beliefs.

AB - Analyzing a large data set from an online card game platform, a traditionally masculine environment with low female representation, we provide novel field evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Our paper complements existing laboratory experiments by studying a setting where selection into and out of the choice environment is endogenous, choices and outcomes are publicly observable and decisions are repeated over hundreds of rounds. We show that despite the possibility of sorting, imitation or learning, female players persistently choose lower risk-return profiles than men. We argue that the observed gender differences in risk taking result from true preference differences rather than a gap in skill, confidence or beliefs.

KW - Gender

KW - Risk preference

KW - Experience

KW - Selection

KW - Natural experiment

KW - Gender

KW - Risk preferences

KW - Experience

KW - Selection

KW - Natural experiment

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921375709&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.011

M3 - Journal article

VL - 158

SP - 62

EP - 89

JO - Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

JF - Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

SN - 0167-2681

ER -