Who’s Afraid of Organization? Concepts, Process and Identity Thinking

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

85 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article argues that we should not abandon the noun ‘organization’ in favour of the verb ‘organizing’ in order to capture processes of change, flow and movement, but instead explore how such processes reveal themselves when the concept of organization diverges from the objects it is supposed to encapsulate. Here I make use of Adorno’s critique of identity thinking in order to show how the experience of organizational phenomena remains trapped within a contradiction: concepts are needed to describe objects even though concepts can never fully exhaust the objects they describe. However, I maintain that it is precisely this discrepancy between concepts and objects that provides us the opportunity to experience the elusive state of organizations and their processual nature. Consequently, this article shows how organizational phenomena are always more complex, temporal and dynamic than what the concept of organization permits us to grasp.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPhilosophy of Management
Volume17
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)303-319
Number of pages17
ISSN1740-3812
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

Published online: 26. October 2017

Keywords

  • Process theory
  • Verb-noun
  • Identity thinking
  • Concepts
  • Negative dialectics
  • Organization

Cite this

@article{6afdf30ea25b4478bc8c54acb6264b2b,
title = "Who’s Afraid of Organization?: Concepts, Process and Identity Thinking",
abstract = "This article argues that we should not abandon the noun ‘organization’ in favour of the verb ‘organizing’ in order to capture processes of change, flow and movement, but instead explore how such processes reveal themselves when the concept of organization diverges from the objects it is supposed to encapsulate. Here I make use of Adorno’s critique of identity thinking in order to show how the experience of organizational phenomena remains trapped within a contradiction: concepts are needed to describe objects even though concepts can never fully exhaust the objects they describe. However, I maintain that it is precisely this discrepancy between concepts and objects that provides us the opportunity to experience the elusive state of organizations and their processual nature. Consequently, this article shows how organizational phenomena are always more complex, temporal and dynamic than what the concept of organization permits us to grasp.",
keywords = "Process theory, Verb-noun, Identity thinking, Concepts, Negative dialectics, Organization, Process theory, Verb-noun, Identity thinking, Concepts, Negative dialectics, Organization",
author = "Johnsen, {Christian Garmann}",
note = "Published online: 26. October 2017",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s40926-017-0079-5",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "303--319",
journal = "Philosophy of Management",
issn = "1740-3812",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Who’s Afraid of Organization? Concepts, Process and Identity Thinking. / Johnsen, Christian Garmann .

In: Philosophy of Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2018, p. 303-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who’s Afraid of Organization?

T2 - Concepts, Process and Identity Thinking

AU - Johnsen, Christian Garmann

N1 - Published online: 26. October 2017

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article argues that we should not abandon the noun ‘organization’ in favour of the verb ‘organizing’ in order to capture processes of change, flow and movement, but instead explore how such processes reveal themselves when the concept of organization diverges from the objects it is supposed to encapsulate. Here I make use of Adorno’s critique of identity thinking in order to show how the experience of organizational phenomena remains trapped within a contradiction: concepts are needed to describe objects even though concepts can never fully exhaust the objects they describe. However, I maintain that it is precisely this discrepancy between concepts and objects that provides us the opportunity to experience the elusive state of organizations and their processual nature. Consequently, this article shows how organizational phenomena are always more complex, temporal and dynamic than what the concept of organization permits us to grasp.

AB - This article argues that we should not abandon the noun ‘organization’ in favour of the verb ‘organizing’ in order to capture processes of change, flow and movement, but instead explore how such processes reveal themselves when the concept of organization diverges from the objects it is supposed to encapsulate. Here I make use of Adorno’s critique of identity thinking in order to show how the experience of organizational phenomena remains trapped within a contradiction: concepts are needed to describe objects even though concepts can never fully exhaust the objects they describe. However, I maintain that it is precisely this discrepancy between concepts and objects that provides us the opportunity to experience the elusive state of organizations and their processual nature. Consequently, this article shows how organizational phenomena are always more complex, temporal and dynamic than what the concept of organization permits us to grasp.

KW - Process theory

KW - Verb-noun

KW - Identity thinking

KW - Concepts

KW - Negative dialectics

KW - Organization

KW - Process theory

KW - Verb-noun

KW - Identity thinking

KW - Concepts

KW - Negative dialectics

KW - Organization

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000044391

U2 - 10.1007/s40926-017-0079-5

DO - 10.1007/s40926-017-0079-5

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 303

EP - 319

JO - Philosophy of Management

JF - Philosophy of Management

SN - 1740-3812

IS - 3

ER -