Which Europeans like Nudges?: Approval and Controversy in Four European Countries

Cäzilia Loibl, Cass R. Sunstein, Julius Rauber, Lucia A. Reisch

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Policy makers show an increasing interest in “nudges”—behaviorally motivated interventions that steer people in certain directions but maintain freedom of consumer choice. Despite this interest, little evidence has surfaced about which population groups support nudges and nudging. We report the results of nationally representative surveys in Denmark, Hungary, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Individual, household, and geographic characteristics served as predictors of nudge approval, and the count of significant predictors as measures of controversy. Less high approval rates of nudges in Denmark and Hungary were reflected in higher controversy about “System 1” nudges, whereas the United Kingdom and Italy were marked by higher controversy about “System 2” nudges, despite high approval rates. High‐controversy nudges tended to be associated with current public policy concerns, for example, meat consumption. The results point to means for effective targeting and increase knowledge about the types of nudges likely to obtain public support.
Policy makers show an increasing interest in “nudges”—behaviorally motivated interventions that steer people in certain directions but maintain freedom of consumer choice. Despite this interest, little evidence has surfaced about which population groups support nudges and nudging. We report the results of nationally representative surveys in Denmark, Hungary, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Individual, household, and geographic characteristics served as predictors of nudge approval, and the count of significant predictors as measures of controversy. Less high approval rates of nudges in Denmark and Hungary were reflected in higher controversy about “System 1” nudges, whereas the United Kingdom and Italy were marked by higher controversy about “System 2” nudges, despite high approval rates. High‐controversy nudges tended to be associated with current public policy concerns, for example, meat consumption. The results point to means for effective targeting and increase knowledge about the types of nudges likely to obtain public support.
LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Consumer Affairs
Volume52
Issue number3
Pages655-688
Number of pages34
ISSN0022-0078
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

Published online: 29. January 2018

Cite this

Loibl, Cäzilia ; Sunstein, Cass R. ; Rauber, Julius ; Reisch, Lucia A./ Which Europeans like Nudges? Approval and Controversy in Four European Countries. In: Journal of Consumer Affairs. 2018 ; Vol. 52, No. 3. pp. 655-688
@article{02426b30e2e8414ba843584092871821,
title = "Which Europeans like Nudges?: Approval and Controversy in Four European Countries",
abstract = "Policy makers show an increasing interest in “nudges”—behaviorally motivated interventions that steer people in certain directions but maintain freedom of consumer choice. Despite this interest, little evidence has surfaced about which population groups support nudges and nudging. We report the results of nationally representative surveys in Denmark, Hungary, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Individual, household, and geographic characteristics served as predictors of nudge approval, and the count of significant predictors as measures of controversy. Less high approval rates of nudges in Denmark and Hungary were reflected in higher controversy about “System 1” nudges, whereas the United Kingdom and Italy were marked by higher controversy about “System 2” nudges, despite high approval rates. High‐controversy nudges tended to be associated with current public policy concerns, for example, meat consumption. The results point to means for effective targeting and increase knowledge about the types of nudges likely to obtain public support.",
author = "C{\"a}zilia Loibl and Sunstein, {Cass R.} and Julius Rauber and Reisch, {Lucia A.}",
note = "Published online: 29. January 2018",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/joca.12181",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "655--688",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Affairs",
issn = "0022-0078",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Which Europeans like Nudges? Approval and Controversy in Four European Countries. / Loibl, Cäzilia; Sunstein, Cass R.; Rauber, Julius; Reisch, Lucia A.

In: Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2018, p. 655-688.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which Europeans like Nudges?

T2 - Journal of Consumer Affairs

AU - Loibl,Cäzilia

AU - Sunstein,Cass R.

AU - Rauber,Julius

AU - Reisch,Lucia A.

N1 - Published online: 29. January 2018

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Policy makers show an increasing interest in “nudges”—behaviorally motivated interventions that steer people in certain directions but maintain freedom of consumer choice. Despite this interest, little evidence has surfaced about which population groups support nudges and nudging. We report the results of nationally representative surveys in Denmark, Hungary, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Individual, household, and geographic characteristics served as predictors of nudge approval, and the count of significant predictors as measures of controversy. Less high approval rates of nudges in Denmark and Hungary were reflected in higher controversy about “System 1” nudges, whereas the United Kingdom and Italy were marked by higher controversy about “System 2” nudges, despite high approval rates. High‐controversy nudges tended to be associated with current public policy concerns, for example, meat consumption. The results point to means for effective targeting and increase knowledge about the types of nudges likely to obtain public support.

AB - Policy makers show an increasing interest in “nudges”—behaviorally motivated interventions that steer people in certain directions but maintain freedom of consumer choice. Despite this interest, little evidence has surfaced about which population groups support nudges and nudging. We report the results of nationally representative surveys in Denmark, Hungary, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Individual, household, and geographic characteristics served as predictors of nudge approval, and the count of significant predictors as measures of controversy. Less high approval rates of nudges in Denmark and Hungary were reflected in higher controversy about “System 1” nudges, whereas the United Kingdom and Italy were marked by higher controversy about “System 2” nudges, despite high approval rates. High‐controversy nudges tended to be associated with current public policy concerns, for example, meat consumption. The results point to means for effective targeting and increase knowledge about the types of nudges likely to obtain public support.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921348261

U2 - 10.1111/joca.12181

DO - 10.1111/joca.12181

M3 - Journal article

VL - 52

SP - 655

EP - 688

JO - Journal of Consumer Affairs

JF - Journal of Consumer Affairs

SN - 0022-0078

IS - 3

ER -