Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO?

Ari Kokko, Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall, Josefin Videnord

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    Abstract

    This article examines the distribution of antidumping (AD) disputes across countries and industries, and examines which AD cases reach the dispute settlement system of the WTO. Our general finding is that neither the country nor the industry distribution of AD cases remains constant across the different levels of disputes, as cases proceed from notifications to requests for consultations and third party adjudication at the WTO.
    The US is the main user of AD measures, as well as the main target for complaints at the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body. However, emerging markets have increasingly started using AD law to protect their domestic firms. We find that the typical AD notification is submitted by an upper middle-income country, and it focuses on a medium low-technology industry with differentiated products, but low relationship-specificity. The most typical complainant at the WTO is also an upper middle-income country, challenging a high-income country (most likely the US) that is allegedly giving unfair protection to an industry producing differentiated goods that are not very relationship-specific, using medium-low technologies.
    The analysis also reveals that when lower middle-income countries are challenged at the WTO, disputes are often resolved before third party adjudication is needed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationStockholm
    PublisherThe Ratio Institute
    Number of pages50
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    SeriesRatio Working Paper
    Number286

    Keywords

    • Trade conflict
    • Antidumping
    • WTO
    • Dispute settlement

    Cite this

    Kokko, A., Tingvall, P. G., & Videnord, J. (2017). Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO? Stockholm: The Ratio Institute. Ratio Working Paper, No. 286
    Kokko, Ari ; Tingvall, Patrik Gustavsson ; Videnord, Josefin. / Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO?. Stockholm : The Ratio Institute, 2017. (Ratio Working Paper; No. 286).
    @techreport{f284be6aabde4d42aa3ccca58d529d50,
    title = "Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO?",
    abstract = "This article examines the distribution of antidumping (AD) disputes across countries and industries, and examines which AD cases reach the dispute settlement system of the WTO. Our general finding is that neither the country nor the industry distribution of AD cases remains constant across the different levels of disputes, as cases proceed from notifications to requests for consultations and third party adjudication at the WTO.The US is the main user of AD measures, as well as the main target for complaints at the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body. However, emerging markets have increasingly started using AD law to protect their domestic firms. We find that the typical AD notification is submitted by an upper middle-income country, and it focuses on a medium low-technology industry with differentiated products, but low relationship-specificity. The most typical complainant at the WTO is also an upper middle-income country, challenging a high-income country (most likely the US) that is allegedly giving unfair protection to an industry producing differentiated goods that are not very relationship-specific, using medium-low technologies. The analysis also reveals that when lower middle-income countries are challenged at the WTO, disputes are often resolved before third party adjudication is needed.",
    keywords = "Trade conflict, Antidumping, WTO, Dispute settlement, Trade conflict, Antidumping, WTO, Dispute settlement",
    author = "Ari Kokko and Tingvall, {Patrik Gustavsson} and Josefin Videnord",
    year = "2017",
    language = "English",
    publisher = "The Ratio Institute",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "The Ratio Institute",

    }

    Kokko, A, Tingvall, PG & Videnord, J 2017 'Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO?' The Ratio Institute, Stockholm.

    Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO? / Kokko, Ari; Tingvall, Patrik Gustavsson; Videnord, Josefin.

    Stockholm : The Ratio Institute, 2017.

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO?

    AU - Kokko, Ari

    AU - Tingvall, Patrik Gustavsson

    AU - Videnord, Josefin

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - This article examines the distribution of antidumping (AD) disputes across countries and industries, and examines which AD cases reach the dispute settlement system of the WTO. Our general finding is that neither the country nor the industry distribution of AD cases remains constant across the different levels of disputes, as cases proceed from notifications to requests for consultations and third party adjudication at the WTO.The US is the main user of AD measures, as well as the main target for complaints at the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body. However, emerging markets have increasingly started using AD law to protect their domestic firms. We find that the typical AD notification is submitted by an upper middle-income country, and it focuses on a medium low-technology industry with differentiated products, but low relationship-specificity. The most typical complainant at the WTO is also an upper middle-income country, challenging a high-income country (most likely the US) that is allegedly giving unfair protection to an industry producing differentiated goods that are not very relationship-specific, using medium-low technologies. The analysis also reveals that when lower middle-income countries are challenged at the WTO, disputes are often resolved before third party adjudication is needed.

    AB - This article examines the distribution of antidumping (AD) disputes across countries and industries, and examines which AD cases reach the dispute settlement system of the WTO. Our general finding is that neither the country nor the industry distribution of AD cases remains constant across the different levels of disputes, as cases proceed from notifications to requests for consultations and third party adjudication at the WTO.The US is the main user of AD measures, as well as the main target for complaints at the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body. However, emerging markets have increasingly started using AD law to protect their domestic firms. We find that the typical AD notification is submitted by an upper middle-income country, and it focuses on a medium low-technology industry with differentiated products, but low relationship-specificity. The most typical complainant at the WTO is also an upper middle-income country, challenging a high-income country (most likely the US) that is allegedly giving unfair protection to an industry producing differentiated goods that are not very relationship-specific, using medium-low technologies. The analysis also reveals that when lower middle-income countries are challenged at the WTO, disputes are often resolved before third party adjudication is needed.

    KW - Trade conflict

    KW - Antidumping

    KW - WTO

    KW - Dispute settlement

    KW - Trade conflict

    KW - Antidumping

    KW - WTO

    KW - Dispute settlement

    M3 - Working paper

    BT - Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO?

    PB - The Ratio Institute

    CY - Stockholm

    ER -

    Kokko A, Tingvall PG, Videnord J. Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO? Stockholm: The Ratio Institute. 2017.