When No Is not an Option

The Immunization Against Silence in a Motivational Interview About Marijuana Use

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Many studies have documented how welfare service and professional practices increasingly depend upon the willingness of the citizen to engage actively in dialogues with professionals. This, however, produces the problem of how to deal with citizens who are silent. The framework of Motivational Interviewing presents itself as one solution to this problem. This article explores how Motivational Interviewing operates with a set of strategies to avoid the silence of citizens. We draw on theoretical concepts developed by Niklas Luhmann to analyse a particular instantiation of Motivational Interviewing produced by the Danish National Board of Health, namely a conversation concept entitled, the Marijuana Conversation. We ask thus: what is put at stake when health communication is designed to anticipate and make itself immune to the citizens’ refusal to have a dialogue. Our analysis identifies the different strategies of the conversation concept to make it difficult for the citizen to refuse continued communication. We conclude that by trying to make itself immune to the citizen’s ‘no’, the conversation undermines the possibilities of reaching its objective of empowering the citizen.
Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Theory & Health
Number of pages20
ISSN1477-8211
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Aug 2019

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 5. August 2019

Keywords

  • Motivational interviewing
  • Health prevention
  • Silence
  • Niklas Luhmann
  • Social immune mechanisms

Cite this

@article{29f5044f09d0454195600aa73107d082,
title = "When No Is not an Option: The Immunization Against Silence in a Motivational Interview About Marijuana Use",
abstract = "Many studies have documented how welfare service and professional practices increasingly depend upon the willingness of the citizen to engage actively in dialogues with professionals. This, however, produces the problem of how to deal with citizens who are silent. The framework of Motivational Interviewing presents itself as one solution to this problem. This article explores how Motivational Interviewing operates with a set of strategies to avoid the silence of citizens. We draw on theoretical concepts developed by Niklas Luhmann to analyse a particular instantiation of Motivational Interviewing produced by the Danish National Board of Health, namely a conversation concept entitled, the Marijuana Conversation. We ask thus: what is put at stake when health communication is designed to anticipate and make itself immune to the citizens’ refusal to have a dialogue. Our analysis identifies the different strategies of the conversation concept to make it difficult for the citizen to refuse continued communication. We conclude that by trying to make itself immune to the citizen’s ‘no’, the conversation undermines the possibilities of reaching its objective of empowering the citizen.",
keywords = "Motivational interviewing, Health prevention, Silence, Niklas Luhmann, Social immune mechanisms, Motivational interviewing, Health prevention, Silence, Niklas Luhmann, Social immune mechanisms",
author = "Andersen, {Niels {\AA}kerstr{\o}m} and Pors, {Justine Gr{\o}nb{\ae}k}",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 5. August 2019",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1057/s41285-019-00112-1",
language = "English",
journal = "Social Theory & Health",
issn = "1477-8211",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When No Is not an Option

T2 - The Immunization Against Silence in a Motivational Interview About Marijuana Use

AU - Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm

AU - Pors, Justine Grønbæk

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 5. August 2019

PY - 2019/8/5

Y1 - 2019/8/5

N2 - Many studies have documented how welfare service and professional practices increasingly depend upon the willingness of the citizen to engage actively in dialogues with professionals. This, however, produces the problem of how to deal with citizens who are silent. The framework of Motivational Interviewing presents itself as one solution to this problem. This article explores how Motivational Interviewing operates with a set of strategies to avoid the silence of citizens. We draw on theoretical concepts developed by Niklas Luhmann to analyse a particular instantiation of Motivational Interviewing produced by the Danish National Board of Health, namely a conversation concept entitled, the Marijuana Conversation. We ask thus: what is put at stake when health communication is designed to anticipate and make itself immune to the citizens’ refusal to have a dialogue. Our analysis identifies the different strategies of the conversation concept to make it difficult for the citizen to refuse continued communication. We conclude that by trying to make itself immune to the citizen’s ‘no’, the conversation undermines the possibilities of reaching its objective of empowering the citizen.

AB - Many studies have documented how welfare service and professional practices increasingly depend upon the willingness of the citizen to engage actively in dialogues with professionals. This, however, produces the problem of how to deal with citizens who are silent. The framework of Motivational Interviewing presents itself as one solution to this problem. This article explores how Motivational Interviewing operates with a set of strategies to avoid the silence of citizens. We draw on theoretical concepts developed by Niklas Luhmann to analyse a particular instantiation of Motivational Interviewing produced by the Danish National Board of Health, namely a conversation concept entitled, the Marijuana Conversation. We ask thus: what is put at stake when health communication is designed to anticipate and make itself immune to the citizens’ refusal to have a dialogue. Our analysis identifies the different strategies of the conversation concept to make it difficult for the citizen to refuse continued communication. We conclude that by trying to make itself immune to the citizen’s ‘no’, the conversation undermines the possibilities of reaching its objective of empowering the citizen.

KW - Motivational interviewing

KW - Health prevention

KW - Silence

KW - Niklas Luhmann

KW - Social immune mechanisms

KW - Motivational interviewing

KW - Health prevention

KW - Silence

KW - Niklas Luhmann

KW - Social immune mechanisms

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=111056402034010&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1057/s41285-019-00112-1

DO - 10.1057/s41285-019-00112-1

M3 - Journal article

JO - Social Theory & Health

JF - Social Theory & Health

SN - 1477-8211

ER -