When Does Fame Not Matter? Examining Gender Differences in Politicians’ Social Media Experiences

  • Maarja Lühiste*
  • , Stiene Praet
  • , Sebastian Adrian Popa
  • , Yannis Theocharis
  • , Pablo Barberá
  • , Zoltán Fazekas
  • , Joshua A. Tucker
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Past research alerts to the increasingly unpleasant climate surrounding public debate on social media. Female politicians, in particular, are reporting serious attacks targeted at them. Yet, research offers inconclusive insights regarding the gender gap in online incivility. This paper aims to address this gap by comparing politicians with varying levels of prominence and public status in different institutional contexts. Using a machine learning approach for analyzing over 23 million tweets addressed to politicians in Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States, we find little consistent evidence of a gender gap in the proportion of incivility. However, more prominent politicians are considerably and consistently more likely than others to receive uncivil attacks. While prominence influences US male and female politicians’ probability to receive uncivil tweets the same way, women in our European sample receive incivility regardless of their status. Most importantly, the incivility varies in quality and across contexts, with women, especially in more plurality contexts, receiving more identity-based attacks than other politicians.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitics & Gender
Number of pages28
ISSN1743-923X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 30 July 2025.

Keywords

  • Gender and political representation
  • Campaigns
  • Social media
  • Incivility
  • Machine learning
  • Elections
  • Elite-voter interaction

Cite this