Vicious and Virtuous Circles of Aspirational Talk

From Self Persuasive to Agonistic CSR Rhetoric

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Scholars are divided over the question of whether managerial aspirational talk that contradicts current business practices can contribute to corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this conceptual article, we explore the rhetorical dynamics of aspirational talk that either impede or foster CSR. We argue that self-persuasive CSR rhetoric, as one enactment of aspirational talk, can attract attention and scrutiny from organizational members. Continued adherence to this rhetoric, however, creates and perpetuates tensions that lead to a vicious circle of disengagement. A virtuous circle, by contrast, requires a shift toward an agonistic rhetoric that transcends tensions by rearticulating aspirations in concurrence with situated understandings of responsible corporate practice. Our arguments contribute to a better understanding of how communication becomes constitutive of CSR and address the debate on decoupling between talk and action.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBusiness & Society
Number of pages31
ISSN0007-6503
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: February 13, 2019

Keywords

  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Aspirational talk
  • Rhetoric
  • Agonism
  • Decoupling

Cite this

@article{17471353055544ca94aa75625184fe1f,
title = "Vicious and Virtuous Circles of Aspirational Talk: From Self Persuasive to Agonistic CSR Rhetoric",
abstract = "Scholars are divided over the question of whether managerial aspirational talk that contradicts current business practices can contribute to corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this conceptual article, we explore the rhetorical dynamics of aspirational talk that either impede or foster CSR. We argue that self-persuasive CSR rhetoric, as one enactment of aspirational talk, can attract attention and scrutiny from organizational members. Continued adherence to this rhetoric, however, creates and perpetuates tensions that lead to a vicious circle of disengagement. A virtuous circle, by contrast, requires a shift toward an agonistic rhetoric that transcends tensions by rearticulating aspirations in concurrence with situated understandings of responsible corporate practice. Our arguments contribute to a better understanding of how communication becomes constitutive of CSR and address the debate on decoupling between talk and action.",
keywords = "Corporate social responsibility, Aspirational talk, Rhetoric, Agonism, Decoupling, Corporate social responsibility, Aspirational talk, Rhetoric, Agonism, Decoupling",
author = "Peter Winkler and Michael Etter and Itziar Castello",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: February 13, 2019",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1177/0007650319825758",
language = "English",
journal = "Business & Society",
issn = "0007-6503",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",

}

Vicious and Virtuous Circles of Aspirational Talk : From Self Persuasive to Agonistic CSR Rhetoric. / Winkler, Peter; Etter, Michael; Castello, Itziar.

In: Business & Society, 13.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vicious and Virtuous Circles of Aspirational Talk

T2 - From Self Persuasive to Agonistic CSR Rhetoric

AU - Winkler, Peter

AU - Etter, Michael

AU - Castello, Itziar

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: February 13, 2019

PY - 2019/2/13

Y1 - 2019/2/13

N2 - Scholars are divided over the question of whether managerial aspirational talk that contradicts current business practices can contribute to corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this conceptual article, we explore the rhetorical dynamics of aspirational talk that either impede or foster CSR. We argue that self-persuasive CSR rhetoric, as one enactment of aspirational talk, can attract attention and scrutiny from organizational members. Continued adherence to this rhetoric, however, creates and perpetuates tensions that lead to a vicious circle of disengagement. A virtuous circle, by contrast, requires a shift toward an agonistic rhetoric that transcends tensions by rearticulating aspirations in concurrence with situated understandings of responsible corporate practice. Our arguments contribute to a better understanding of how communication becomes constitutive of CSR and address the debate on decoupling between talk and action.

AB - Scholars are divided over the question of whether managerial aspirational talk that contradicts current business practices can contribute to corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this conceptual article, we explore the rhetorical dynamics of aspirational talk that either impede or foster CSR. We argue that self-persuasive CSR rhetoric, as one enactment of aspirational talk, can attract attention and scrutiny from organizational members. Continued adherence to this rhetoric, however, creates and perpetuates tensions that lead to a vicious circle of disengagement. A virtuous circle, by contrast, requires a shift toward an agonistic rhetoric that transcends tensions by rearticulating aspirations in concurrence with situated understandings of responsible corporate practice. Our arguments contribute to a better understanding of how communication becomes constitutive of CSR and address the debate on decoupling between talk and action.

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Aspirational talk

KW - Rhetoric

KW - Agonism

KW - Decoupling

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Aspirational talk

KW - Rhetoric

KW - Agonism

KW - Decoupling

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921337077&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1177/0007650319825758

DO - 10.1177/0007650319825758

M3 - Journal article

JO - Business & Society

JF - Business & Society

SN - 0007-6503

ER -