Value Co-creation in Practitioner-Academia Relationships

Competencies for Co-creating Actionable Research

Rikke Kristine Nielsen

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper addresses the research practice of practicable research by drawing a map of methodological in-roads to doing research with a view to bridging the practitioner-research gap and producing what has been termed as ‘actionable research’ by engaging closely with practitioners in the research process. The map includes three territories and methodological in-roads for doing research in close collaboration with practitioners with a view to mutual value creation and co-construction: Doing research, in/with(in), for and in-between organizations.
The methodological reflections in the map are illustrated and discussed against the backdrop of a concrete instance of academia-practitioner collaboration, the industrial Ph.D. research project of Group Mindset-Development in Solar A/S. The industrial Ph.D. researcher is seen as a front-runner vis-a-vis a political climate of increasing demands from governments to universities with regards to the ability of research groups to demonstrate co-operation with external stakeholder groups and an illustration of the privileges and pitfalls of doing research in close engagement with practice called for by the increasing academic interest for actionable research.
Using empirical data from this on-going practitioneracademia research project, a literature review and inputs from a professional development workshop organized by the author at the British Academy Management’s annual meeting 2012 a position for doing research in/with(in), for and in-between practice is carved out. Based on the challenges and potential pitfalls inherent in this research position, researcher competencies for successfully handling the research management of the in-between and bridging the academia-practitioner gap in research practice are discussed. Further, competency requirements of both academia and practice as main stakeholders in an industrial Ph.D. project or other projects with the ambition to create value in both camps simultaneously are debated based on the methodological map presented.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2013
Number of pages22
Publication statusPublished - 2013
EventThe 22nd Nordic Academy of Management Conference. 2013: On Practice and Knowledge Eruptions - University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
Duration: 21 Aug 201323 Aug 2013
Conference number: 22
https://nff2013.hi.is/

Conference

ConferenceThe 22nd Nordic Academy of Management Conference. 2013
Number22
LocationUniversity of Iceland
CountryIceland
CityReykjavík
Period21/08/201323/08/2013
Internet address

Bibliographical note

CBS Library does not have access to the material

Cite this

Nielsen, R. K. (2013). Value Co-creation in Practitioner-Academia Relationships: Competencies for Co-creating Actionable Research. Paper presented at The 22nd Nordic Academy of Management Conference. 2013, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Nielsen, Rikke Kristine. / Value Co-creation in Practitioner-Academia Relationships : Competencies for Co-creating Actionable Research. Paper presented at The 22nd Nordic Academy of Management Conference. 2013, Reykjavík, Iceland.22 p.
@conference{a7fb466f0a3d4332bf479fed5122f324,
title = "Value Co-creation in Practitioner-Academia Relationships: Competencies for Co-creating Actionable Research",
abstract = "This paper addresses the research practice of practicable research by drawing a map of methodological in-roads to doing research with a view to bridging the practitioner-research gap and producing what has been termed as ‘actionable research’ by engaging closely with practitioners in the research process. The map includes three territories and methodological in-roads for doing research in close collaboration with practitioners with a view to mutual value creation and co-construction: Doing research, in/with(in), for and in-between organizations.The methodological reflections in the map are illustrated and discussed against the backdrop of a concrete instance of academia-practitioner collaboration, the industrial Ph.D. research project of Group Mindset-Development in Solar A/S. The industrial Ph.D. researcher is seen as a front-runner vis-a-vis a political climate of increasing demands from governments to universities with regards to the ability of research groups to demonstrate co-operation with external stakeholder groups and an illustration of the privileges and pitfalls of doing research in close engagement with practice called for by the increasing academic interest for actionable research.Using empirical data from this on-going practitioneracademia research project, a literature review and inputs from a professional development workshop organized by the author at the British Academy Management’s annual meeting 2012 a position for doing research in/with(in), for and in-between practice is carved out. Based on the challenges and potential pitfalls inherent in this research position, researcher competencies for successfully handling the research management of the in-between and bridging the academia-practitioner gap in research practice are discussed. Further, competency requirements of both academia and practice as main stakeholders in an industrial Ph.D. project or other projects with the ambition to create value in both camps simultaneously are debated based on the methodological map presented.",
author = "Nielsen, {Rikke Kristine}",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 21-08-2013 Through 23-08-2013",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
url = "https://nff2013.hi.is/",

}

Nielsen, RK 2013, 'Value Co-creation in Practitioner-Academia Relationships: Competencies for Co-creating Actionable Research' Paper presented at, Reykjavík, Iceland, 21/08/2013 - 23/08/2013, .

Value Co-creation in Practitioner-Academia Relationships : Competencies for Co-creating Actionable Research. / Nielsen, Rikke Kristine.

2013. Paper presented at The 22nd Nordic Academy of Management Conference. 2013, Reykjavík, Iceland.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Value Co-creation in Practitioner-Academia Relationships

T2 - Competencies for Co-creating Actionable Research

AU - Nielsen, Rikke Kristine

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper addresses the research practice of practicable research by drawing a map of methodological in-roads to doing research with a view to bridging the practitioner-research gap and producing what has been termed as ‘actionable research’ by engaging closely with practitioners in the research process. The map includes three territories and methodological in-roads for doing research in close collaboration with practitioners with a view to mutual value creation and co-construction: Doing research, in/with(in), for and in-between organizations.The methodological reflections in the map are illustrated and discussed against the backdrop of a concrete instance of academia-practitioner collaboration, the industrial Ph.D. research project of Group Mindset-Development in Solar A/S. The industrial Ph.D. researcher is seen as a front-runner vis-a-vis a political climate of increasing demands from governments to universities with regards to the ability of research groups to demonstrate co-operation with external stakeholder groups and an illustration of the privileges and pitfalls of doing research in close engagement with practice called for by the increasing academic interest for actionable research.Using empirical data from this on-going practitioneracademia research project, a literature review and inputs from a professional development workshop organized by the author at the British Academy Management’s annual meeting 2012 a position for doing research in/with(in), for and in-between practice is carved out. Based on the challenges and potential pitfalls inherent in this research position, researcher competencies for successfully handling the research management of the in-between and bridging the academia-practitioner gap in research practice are discussed. Further, competency requirements of both academia and practice as main stakeholders in an industrial Ph.D. project or other projects with the ambition to create value in both camps simultaneously are debated based on the methodological map presented.

AB - This paper addresses the research practice of practicable research by drawing a map of methodological in-roads to doing research with a view to bridging the practitioner-research gap and producing what has been termed as ‘actionable research’ by engaging closely with practitioners in the research process. The map includes three territories and methodological in-roads for doing research in close collaboration with practitioners with a view to mutual value creation and co-construction: Doing research, in/with(in), for and in-between organizations.The methodological reflections in the map are illustrated and discussed against the backdrop of a concrete instance of academia-practitioner collaboration, the industrial Ph.D. research project of Group Mindset-Development in Solar A/S. The industrial Ph.D. researcher is seen as a front-runner vis-a-vis a political climate of increasing demands from governments to universities with regards to the ability of research groups to demonstrate co-operation with external stakeholder groups and an illustration of the privileges and pitfalls of doing research in close engagement with practice called for by the increasing academic interest for actionable research.Using empirical data from this on-going practitioneracademia research project, a literature review and inputs from a professional development workshop organized by the author at the British Academy Management’s annual meeting 2012 a position for doing research in/with(in), for and in-between practice is carved out. Based on the challenges and potential pitfalls inherent in this research position, researcher competencies for successfully handling the research management of the in-between and bridging the academia-practitioner gap in research practice are discussed. Further, competency requirements of both academia and practice as main stakeholders in an industrial Ph.D. project or other projects with the ambition to create value in both camps simultaneously are debated based on the methodological map presented.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Nielsen RK. Value Co-creation in Practitioner-Academia Relationships: Competencies for Co-creating Actionable Research. 2013. Paper presented at The 22nd Nordic Academy of Management Conference. 2013, Reykjavík, Iceland.