Using Porterian Activity Analysis to Understand Organizational Capabilities

Norman T. Sheehan, Nicolai Juul Foss

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The article argues that organizational capabilities are comprised of two fundamental components: resources and activities. The starting point of the argument is that resources are best conceptualized by Barney’s and others’ research on the resource-based view, while activities are best conceptualized by Porter’s writings on the activity-based view. Porterian activity analysis is becoming more accepted in the strategy literature, but no strategy scholar has explicitly used Porter’s activities, and particularly his concept of drivers, to understand and analyze organizational capabilities. Introducing Porterian activities into the discussion of capabilities improves strategy scholars’ understanding of the bases of capability heterogeneity, offers academics future directions for research, and provides managers with guidance to enhance their organizations’ capabilities.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of General Management
Volume42
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)41-51
Number of pages11
ISSN0306-3070
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Activities
  • Activity-based view
  • Capabilities
  • Heterogeneity
  • Porter
  • Resource-based view
  • Resources
  • Value chain

Cite this

@article{6bb6575c2f4849e0b5a7f041b526cb37,
title = "Using Porterian Activity Analysis to Understand Organizational Capabilities",
abstract = "The article argues that organizational capabilities are comprised of two fundamental components: resources and activities. The starting point of the argument is that resources are best conceptualized by Barney’s and others’ research on the resource-based view, while activities are best conceptualized by Porter’s writings on the activity-based view. Porterian activity analysis is becoming more accepted in the strategy literature, but no strategy scholar has explicitly used Porter’s activities, and particularly his concept of drivers, to understand and analyze organizational capabilities. Introducing Porterian activities into the discussion of capabilities improves strategy scholars’ understanding of the bases of capability heterogeneity, offers academics future directions for research, and provides managers with guidance to enhance their organizations’ capabilities.",
keywords = "Activities, Activity-based view, Capabilities, Heterogeneity, Porter, Resource-based view, Resources, Value chain, Activities, Activity-based view, Capabilities, Heterogeneity, Porter, Resource-based view, Resources, Value chain",
author = "Sheehan, {Norman T.} and Foss, {Nicolai Juul}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/0306307017690518",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "41--51",
journal = "Journal of General Management",
issn = "0306-3070",
publisher = "Braybrooke Press Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Using Porterian Activity Analysis to Understand Organizational Capabilities. / Sheehan, Norman T.; Foss, Nicolai Juul.

In: Journal of General Management, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2017, p. 41-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Porterian Activity Analysis to Understand Organizational Capabilities

AU - Sheehan, Norman T.

AU - Foss, Nicolai Juul

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The article argues that organizational capabilities are comprised of two fundamental components: resources and activities. The starting point of the argument is that resources are best conceptualized by Barney’s and others’ research on the resource-based view, while activities are best conceptualized by Porter’s writings on the activity-based view. Porterian activity analysis is becoming more accepted in the strategy literature, but no strategy scholar has explicitly used Porter’s activities, and particularly his concept of drivers, to understand and analyze organizational capabilities. Introducing Porterian activities into the discussion of capabilities improves strategy scholars’ understanding of the bases of capability heterogeneity, offers academics future directions for research, and provides managers with guidance to enhance their organizations’ capabilities.

AB - The article argues that organizational capabilities are comprised of two fundamental components: resources and activities. The starting point of the argument is that resources are best conceptualized by Barney’s and others’ research on the resource-based view, while activities are best conceptualized by Porter’s writings on the activity-based view. Porterian activity analysis is becoming more accepted in the strategy literature, but no strategy scholar has explicitly used Porter’s activities, and particularly his concept of drivers, to understand and analyze organizational capabilities. Introducing Porterian activities into the discussion of capabilities improves strategy scholars’ understanding of the bases of capability heterogeneity, offers academics future directions for research, and provides managers with guidance to enhance their organizations’ capabilities.

KW - Activities

KW - Activity-based view

KW - Capabilities

KW - Heterogeneity

KW - Porter

KW - Resource-based view

KW - Resources

KW - Value chain

KW - Activities

KW - Activity-based view

KW - Capabilities

KW - Heterogeneity

KW - Porter

KW - Resource-based view

KW - Resources

KW - Value chain

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921388925

U2 - 10.1177/0306307017690518

DO - 10.1177/0306307017690518

M3 - Journal article

VL - 42

SP - 41

EP - 51

JO - Journal of General Management

JF - Journal of General Management

SN - 0306-3070

IS - 3

ER -