Unpacking the Meaning of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this conceptual essay, we review the field of organizational conflict to unpack how it has been constructed genealogically and with what consequences by investigating three major shifts in theorization that have occurred over the past six decades. First, a move away from viewing conflict as dysfunctional to viewing it as constructive. Second, a shift from normative prescriptions to descriptions of what disputants do in conflict. Third, a shift from psychological functional analyses to studying conflict as an organizational phenomenon. We find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work: conflict as a distinct behavioral phenomenon, conflict as an instrumental means of achieving something else, and conflict as a social construction contingent on how reality is perceived. This conceptual essay adds to current thinking in organizational conflict research by emphasizing how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict can be seen to have framed knowledge production within the field when it is viewed historically.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNegotiation and Conflict Management Research
Volume11
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)185-203
Number of pages19
ISSN1750-4708
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Organizational conflict
  • Conflict management
  • Philosophy of science
  • Theorizing

Cite this

@article{bfae28a69bb64aa2b8138d840e65c006,
title = "Unpacking the Meaning of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research",
abstract = "In this conceptual essay, we review the field of organizational conflict to unpack how it has been constructed genealogically and with what consequences by investigating three major shifts in theorization that have occurred over the past six decades. First, a move away from viewing conflict as dysfunctional to viewing it as constructive. Second, a shift from normative prescriptions to descriptions of what disputants do in conflict. Third, a shift from psychological functional analyses to studying conflict as an organizational phenomenon. We find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work: conflict as a distinct behavioral phenomenon, conflict as an instrumental means of achieving something else, and conflict as a social construction contingent on how reality is perceived. This conceptual essay adds to current thinking in organizational conflict research by emphasizing how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict can be seen to have framed knowledge production within the field when it is viewed historically.",
keywords = "Organizational conflict, Conflict management, Philosophy of science, Theorizing, Organizational conflict, Conflict management, Philosophy of science, Theorizing",
author = "Mikkelsen, {Elisabeth Naima} and Steward Clegg",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/ncmr.12127",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "185--203",
journal = "Negotiation and Conflict Management Research",
issn = "1750-4708",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Unpacking the Meaning of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research. / Mikkelsen, Elisabeth Naima; Clegg, Steward.

In: Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, Vol. 11, No. 3, 08.2018, p. 185-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking the Meaning of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research

AU - Mikkelsen, Elisabeth Naima

AU - Clegg, Steward

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - In this conceptual essay, we review the field of organizational conflict to unpack how it has been constructed genealogically and with what consequences by investigating three major shifts in theorization that have occurred over the past six decades. First, a move away from viewing conflict as dysfunctional to viewing it as constructive. Second, a shift from normative prescriptions to descriptions of what disputants do in conflict. Third, a shift from psychological functional analyses to studying conflict as an organizational phenomenon. We find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work: conflict as a distinct behavioral phenomenon, conflict as an instrumental means of achieving something else, and conflict as a social construction contingent on how reality is perceived. This conceptual essay adds to current thinking in organizational conflict research by emphasizing how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict can be seen to have framed knowledge production within the field when it is viewed historically.

AB - In this conceptual essay, we review the field of organizational conflict to unpack how it has been constructed genealogically and with what consequences by investigating three major shifts in theorization that have occurred over the past six decades. First, a move away from viewing conflict as dysfunctional to viewing it as constructive. Second, a shift from normative prescriptions to descriptions of what disputants do in conflict. Third, a shift from psychological functional analyses to studying conflict as an organizational phenomenon. We find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work: conflict as a distinct behavioral phenomenon, conflict as an instrumental means of achieving something else, and conflict as a social construction contingent on how reality is perceived. This conceptual essay adds to current thinking in organizational conflict research by emphasizing how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict can be seen to have framed knowledge production within the field when it is viewed historically.

KW - Organizational conflict

KW - Conflict management

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Theorizing

KW - Organizational conflict

KW - Conflict management

KW - Philosophy of science

KW - Theorizing

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000366591

U2 - 10.1111/ncmr.12127

DO - 10.1111/ncmr.12127

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 185

EP - 203

JO - Negotiation and Conflict Management Research

JF - Negotiation and Conflict Management Research

SN - 1750-4708

IS - 3

ER -