Twitter and its Usage for Dialogic Stakeholder Communication by MNCs and NGOs

Dennis Schoeneborn, Sarah Inauen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The era of globalization has increased the challenges for multinational corporations (MNCs) to retain legitimacy. In striving for legitimacy, MNCs increasingly engage in dialogue processes with their stakeholders. However, the era of globalization and the parallel rise of the Internet and the new “Web 2.0” have dramatically widened the range of options for such dialogue processes. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in particular make use of “social media” (e.g., Facebook, Weblogs, Twitter) which enable them to quickly generate attention regarding socially and environmentally harmful business practices by MNCs. In response, MNCs have started applying social media technologies for corporate communication purposes. However, given the novelty of these activities, we lack knowledge on how these organizations make use of social media. Therefore, in this chapter, we examine how MNCs and NGOs utilize one particular social media application, that is, Twitter, for dialogic stakeholder communication.
    In our empirical study, we examine current practices of Twitter usage by MNCs and NGOs. We investigate a dataset of more than 3,000 Twitter articles from 30 MNCs and 30 NGOs in the German-speaking world. Our analysis is based on the “conceptual orality or literality” scale by Koch and Oesterreicher (1994).
    The comparative analysis shows that on average MNCs and NGOs exhibit a surprisingly similar profile on Twitter. Both tend toward conceptual literality. However, the analysis of Tweets per organization reveals a much larger variance. At the extreme poles, while some NGOs (like Greenpeace Youth) make extensive use of the medium’s potential for conceptual orality, some MNCs (like Deutsche Börse) almost entirely adhere to conceptual literality. In other words, these MNCs promote a classical one-way model of communication and fail to make use of the dialogue-like qualities of the medium.
    We analyzed a small number of organizations and we restricted our study to MNCs and NGOs in the German-speaking world. Furthermore, Twitter only allows for short messages with a maximum of 140 letters or signs. This, in turn, renders questionable whether the medium is suited to establish deliberative dialogues between MNCs and NGOs that are based on more elaborate arguments which can be expressed in the short format.
    Our study addresses the lack of research regarding new possibilities for stakeholder communication in the age of social media. Moreover, the study methodologically contributes to the study of social media in the context of corporate communication by applying the scale of “conceptual orality or literality” to MNCs’ and NGOs’ Twitter usage.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCommunicating Corporate Social Responsibility : Perspectives and Practice
    EditorsRalph Tench, William Sun, Brian Jones
    Number of pages28
    Place of PublicationBingley
    PublisherEmerald Group Publishing
    Publication date2014
    Pages283-310
    ISBN (Print)9781783507955, 9781783507962
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014
    SeriesCritical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability
    Volume6
    ISSN2043-9059

    Cite this

    Schoeneborn, D., & Inauen, S. (2014). Twitter and its Usage for Dialogic Stakeholder Communication by MNCs and NGOs. In R. Tench, W. Sun, & B. Jones (Eds.), Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives and Practice (pp. 283-310). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability, Vol.. 6 https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-9059(2014)0000006019
    Schoeneborn, Dennis ; Inauen, Sarah. / Twitter and its Usage for Dialogic Stakeholder Communication by MNCs and NGOs. Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives and Practice. editor / Ralph Tench ; William Sun ; Brian Jones. Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing, 2014. pp. 283-310 (Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability, Vol. 6).
    @inbook{baba3c501fa04c37bb7eaec6e6b8a929,
    title = "Twitter and its Usage for Dialogic Stakeholder Communication by MNCs and NGOs",
    abstract = "The era of globalization has increased the challenges for multinational corporations (MNCs) to retain legitimacy. In striving for legitimacy, MNCs increasingly engage in dialogue processes with their stakeholders. However, the era of globalization and the parallel rise of the Internet and the new “Web 2.0” have dramatically widened the range of options for such dialogue processes. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in particular make use of “social media” (e.g., Facebook, Weblogs, Twitter) which enable them to quickly generate attention regarding socially and environmentally harmful business practices by MNCs. In response, MNCs have started applying social media technologies for corporate communication purposes. However, given the novelty of these activities, we lack knowledge on how these organizations make use of social media. Therefore, in this chapter, we examine how MNCs and NGOs utilize one particular social media application, that is, Twitter, for dialogic stakeholder communication.In our empirical study, we examine current practices of Twitter usage by MNCs and NGOs. We investigate a dataset of more than 3,000 Twitter articles from 30 MNCs and 30 NGOs in the German-speaking world. Our analysis is based on the “conceptual orality or literality” scale by Koch and Oesterreicher (1994).The comparative analysis shows that on average MNCs and NGOs exhibit a surprisingly similar profile on Twitter. Both tend toward conceptual literality. However, the analysis of Tweets per organization reveals a much larger variance. At the extreme poles, while some NGOs (like Greenpeace Youth) make extensive use of the medium’s potential for conceptual orality, some MNCs (like Deutsche B{\"o}rse) almost entirely adhere to conceptual literality. In other words, these MNCs promote a classical one-way model of communication and fail to make use of the dialogue-like qualities of the medium.We analyzed a small number of organizations and we restricted our study to MNCs and NGOs in the German-speaking world. Furthermore, Twitter only allows for short messages with a maximum of 140 letters or signs. This, in turn, renders questionable whether the medium is suited to establish deliberative dialogues between MNCs and NGOs that are based on more elaborate arguments which can be expressed in the short format.Our study addresses the lack of research regarding new possibilities for stakeholder communication in the age of social media. Moreover, the study methodologically contributes to the study of social media in the context of corporate communication by applying the scale of “conceptual orality or literality” to MNCs’ and NGOs’ Twitter usage.",
    author = "Dennis Schoeneborn and Sarah Inauen",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1108/S2043-9059(2014)0000006019",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781783507955",
    series = "Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
    pages = "283--310",
    editor = "Ralph Tench and William Sun and Brian Jones",
    booktitle = "Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    Schoeneborn, D & Inauen, S 2014, Twitter and its Usage for Dialogic Stakeholder Communication by MNCs and NGOs. in R Tench, W Sun & B Jones (eds), Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives and Practice. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability, vol. 6, pp. 283-310. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-9059(2014)0000006019

    Twitter and its Usage for Dialogic Stakeholder Communication by MNCs and NGOs. / Schoeneborn, Dennis ; Inauen, Sarah.

    Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives and Practice. ed. / Ralph Tench; William Sun; Brian Jones. Bingley : Emerald Group Publishing, 2014. p. 283-310 (Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability, Vol. 6).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Twitter and its Usage for Dialogic Stakeholder Communication by MNCs and NGOs

    AU - Schoeneborn, Dennis

    AU - Inauen, Sarah

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - The era of globalization has increased the challenges for multinational corporations (MNCs) to retain legitimacy. In striving for legitimacy, MNCs increasingly engage in dialogue processes with their stakeholders. However, the era of globalization and the parallel rise of the Internet and the new “Web 2.0” have dramatically widened the range of options for such dialogue processes. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in particular make use of “social media” (e.g., Facebook, Weblogs, Twitter) which enable them to quickly generate attention regarding socially and environmentally harmful business practices by MNCs. In response, MNCs have started applying social media technologies for corporate communication purposes. However, given the novelty of these activities, we lack knowledge on how these organizations make use of social media. Therefore, in this chapter, we examine how MNCs and NGOs utilize one particular social media application, that is, Twitter, for dialogic stakeholder communication.In our empirical study, we examine current practices of Twitter usage by MNCs and NGOs. We investigate a dataset of more than 3,000 Twitter articles from 30 MNCs and 30 NGOs in the German-speaking world. Our analysis is based on the “conceptual orality or literality” scale by Koch and Oesterreicher (1994).The comparative analysis shows that on average MNCs and NGOs exhibit a surprisingly similar profile on Twitter. Both tend toward conceptual literality. However, the analysis of Tweets per organization reveals a much larger variance. At the extreme poles, while some NGOs (like Greenpeace Youth) make extensive use of the medium’s potential for conceptual orality, some MNCs (like Deutsche Börse) almost entirely adhere to conceptual literality. In other words, these MNCs promote a classical one-way model of communication and fail to make use of the dialogue-like qualities of the medium.We analyzed a small number of organizations and we restricted our study to MNCs and NGOs in the German-speaking world. Furthermore, Twitter only allows for short messages with a maximum of 140 letters or signs. This, in turn, renders questionable whether the medium is suited to establish deliberative dialogues between MNCs and NGOs that are based on more elaborate arguments which can be expressed in the short format.Our study addresses the lack of research regarding new possibilities for stakeholder communication in the age of social media. Moreover, the study methodologically contributes to the study of social media in the context of corporate communication by applying the scale of “conceptual orality or literality” to MNCs’ and NGOs’ Twitter usage.

    AB - The era of globalization has increased the challenges for multinational corporations (MNCs) to retain legitimacy. In striving for legitimacy, MNCs increasingly engage in dialogue processes with their stakeholders. However, the era of globalization and the parallel rise of the Internet and the new “Web 2.0” have dramatically widened the range of options for such dialogue processes. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in particular make use of “social media” (e.g., Facebook, Weblogs, Twitter) which enable them to quickly generate attention regarding socially and environmentally harmful business practices by MNCs. In response, MNCs have started applying social media technologies for corporate communication purposes. However, given the novelty of these activities, we lack knowledge on how these organizations make use of social media. Therefore, in this chapter, we examine how MNCs and NGOs utilize one particular social media application, that is, Twitter, for dialogic stakeholder communication.In our empirical study, we examine current practices of Twitter usage by MNCs and NGOs. We investigate a dataset of more than 3,000 Twitter articles from 30 MNCs and 30 NGOs in the German-speaking world. Our analysis is based on the “conceptual orality or literality” scale by Koch and Oesterreicher (1994).The comparative analysis shows that on average MNCs and NGOs exhibit a surprisingly similar profile on Twitter. Both tend toward conceptual literality. However, the analysis of Tweets per organization reveals a much larger variance. At the extreme poles, while some NGOs (like Greenpeace Youth) make extensive use of the medium’s potential for conceptual orality, some MNCs (like Deutsche Börse) almost entirely adhere to conceptual literality. In other words, these MNCs promote a classical one-way model of communication and fail to make use of the dialogue-like qualities of the medium.We analyzed a small number of organizations and we restricted our study to MNCs and NGOs in the German-speaking world. Furthermore, Twitter only allows for short messages with a maximum of 140 letters or signs. This, in turn, renders questionable whether the medium is suited to establish deliberative dialogues between MNCs and NGOs that are based on more elaborate arguments which can be expressed in the short format.Our study addresses the lack of research regarding new possibilities for stakeholder communication in the age of social media. Moreover, the study methodologically contributes to the study of social media in the context of corporate communication by applying the scale of “conceptual orality or literality” to MNCs’ and NGOs’ Twitter usage.

    U2 - 10.1108/S2043-9059(2014)0000006019

    DO - 10.1108/S2043-9059(2014)0000006019

    M3 - Book chapter

    SN - 9781783507955

    SN - 9781783507962

    T3 - Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability

    SP - 283

    EP - 310

    BT - Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility

    A2 - Tench, Ralph

    A2 - Sun, William

    A2 - Jones, Brian

    PB - Emerald Group Publishing

    CY - Bingley

    ER -

    Schoeneborn D, Inauen S. Twitter and its Usage for Dialogic Stakeholder Communication by MNCs and NGOs. In Tench R, Sun W, Jones B, editors, Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives and Practice. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. 2014. p. 283-310. (Critical Studies on Corporate Responsibility, Governance and Sustainability, Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-9059(2014)0000006019