Trends in Employee Ownership in Eastern Europe

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Employee-owned companies are those where the broad group of employees owns the majority of shares. They have been widespread in the early transition process in Eastern Europe. This raises the question of why this type of ownership was so frequently used in some of the countries involved, and why there was a subsequent rapid transfer to manager ownership or outside ownership. This article gives a theoretical overview of the factors driving and hampering employee ownership, and develops hypotheses about how the transition process provided specific conditions for the development of these firms. The predictions are tested using the new members of the EU in Eastern Europe and the candidate country of Croatia as cases. There is no coherent panel data, but by categorizing specific trends in each country and then combining the different trend variables it is possible to identify the most important factors influencing employee ownership.

    The article concludes that privatization was the main determinant for the initial spread of employee ownership. However, other factors undermined the sustainability of employee-owned firms. No institutions created a framework for employee ownership. The long and deep production crisis meant severe challenges for most companies and created a strong capital constraint for restructuring. The steeply falling and low level of wages and the paternalistic management in most countries meant that employees soon sold their shares. The evidence does not point to lower efficiency in employee-owned firms, but in most countries the institutions, the level of income and the goals of the workers were not conducive to this type of ownership. Earlier experience with workers' self-management is probably a main reason why employee ownership is more stable in Croatia and Slovenia and such experience may also have influenced the developments in Poland and Hungary. Elements of collective ownership with structures for employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) and rules for entry and exit of employee owners have stabilized employee ownership in some countries.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInternational Journal of Human Resource Management
    Volume23
    Issue number8
    Pages (from-to)1611-1642
    Number of pages32
    ISSN0958-5192
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Keywords

    • Eastern Europe
    • Employee Ownership
    • Privatization
    • Transition

    Cite this

    @article{ba28ab3009b04d52be28f032dc0b5a98,
    title = "Trends in Employee Ownership in Eastern Europe",
    abstract = "Employee-owned companies are those where the broad group of employees owns the majority of shares. They have been widespread in the early transition process in Eastern Europe. This raises the question of why this type of ownership was so frequently used in some of the countries involved, and why there was a subsequent rapid transfer to manager ownership or outside ownership. This article gives a theoretical overview of the factors driving and hampering employee ownership, and develops hypotheses about how the transition process provided specific conditions for the development of these firms. The predictions are tested using the new members of the EU in Eastern Europe and the candidate country of Croatia as cases. There is no coherent panel data, but by categorizing specific trends in each country and then combining the different trend variables it is possible to identify the most important factors influencing employee ownership.The article concludes that privatization was the main determinant for the initial spread of employee ownership. However, other factors undermined the sustainability of employee-owned firms. No institutions created a framework for employee ownership. The long and deep production crisis meant severe challenges for most companies and created a strong capital constraint for restructuring. The steeply falling and low level of wages and the paternalistic management in most countries meant that employees soon sold their shares. The evidence does not point to lower efficiency in employee-owned firms, but in most countries the institutions, the level of income and the goals of the workers were not conducive to this type of ownership. Earlier experience with workers' self-management is probably a main reason why employee ownership is more stable in Croatia and Slovenia and such experience may also have influenced the developments in Poland and Hungary. Elements of collective ownership with structures for employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) and rules for entry and exit of employee owners have stabilized employee ownership in some countries.",
    keywords = "Eastern Europe, Employee Ownership, Privatization, Transition",
    author = "Niels Mygind",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1080/09585192.2012.661992",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "1611--1642",
    journal = "International Journal of Human Resource Management",
    issn = "0958-5192",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
    number = "8",

    }

    Trends in Employee Ownership in Eastern Europe. / Mygind, Niels.

    In: International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 23, No. 8, 2012, p. 1611-1642.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Trends in Employee Ownership in Eastern Europe

    AU - Mygind, Niels

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Employee-owned companies are those where the broad group of employees owns the majority of shares. They have been widespread in the early transition process in Eastern Europe. This raises the question of why this type of ownership was so frequently used in some of the countries involved, and why there was a subsequent rapid transfer to manager ownership or outside ownership. This article gives a theoretical overview of the factors driving and hampering employee ownership, and develops hypotheses about how the transition process provided specific conditions for the development of these firms. The predictions are tested using the new members of the EU in Eastern Europe and the candidate country of Croatia as cases. There is no coherent panel data, but by categorizing specific trends in each country and then combining the different trend variables it is possible to identify the most important factors influencing employee ownership.The article concludes that privatization was the main determinant for the initial spread of employee ownership. However, other factors undermined the sustainability of employee-owned firms. No institutions created a framework for employee ownership. The long and deep production crisis meant severe challenges for most companies and created a strong capital constraint for restructuring. The steeply falling and low level of wages and the paternalistic management in most countries meant that employees soon sold their shares. The evidence does not point to lower efficiency in employee-owned firms, but in most countries the institutions, the level of income and the goals of the workers were not conducive to this type of ownership. Earlier experience with workers' self-management is probably a main reason why employee ownership is more stable in Croatia and Slovenia and such experience may also have influenced the developments in Poland and Hungary. Elements of collective ownership with structures for employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) and rules for entry and exit of employee owners have stabilized employee ownership in some countries.

    AB - Employee-owned companies are those where the broad group of employees owns the majority of shares. They have been widespread in the early transition process in Eastern Europe. This raises the question of why this type of ownership was so frequently used in some of the countries involved, and why there was a subsequent rapid transfer to manager ownership or outside ownership. This article gives a theoretical overview of the factors driving and hampering employee ownership, and develops hypotheses about how the transition process provided specific conditions for the development of these firms. The predictions are tested using the new members of the EU in Eastern Europe and the candidate country of Croatia as cases. There is no coherent panel data, but by categorizing specific trends in each country and then combining the different trend variables it is possible to identify the most important factors influencing employee ownership.The article concludes that privatization was the main determinant for the initial spread of employee ownership. However, other factors undermined the sustainability of employee-owned firms. No institutions created a framework for employee ownership. The long and deep production crisis meant severe challenges for most companies and created a strong capital constraint for restructuring. The steeply falling and low level of wages and the paternalistic management in most countries meant that employees soon sold their shares. The evidence does not point to lower efficiency in employee-owned firms, but in most countries the institutions, the level of income and the goals of the workers were not conducive to this type of ownership. Earlier experience with workers' self-management is probably a main reason why employee ownership is more stable in Croatia and Slovenia and such experience may also have influenced the developments in Poland and Hungary. Elements of collective ownership with structures for employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) and rules for entry and exit of employee owners have stabilized employee ownership in some countries.

    KW - Eastern Europe

    KW - Employee Ownership

    KW - Privatization

    KW - Transition

    U2 - 10.1080/09585192.2012.661992

    DO - 10.1080/09585192.2012.661992

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 23

    SP - 1611

    EP - 1642

    JO - International Journal of Human Resource Management

    JF - International Journal of Human Resource Management

    SN - 0958-5192

    IS - 8

    ER -