Towards a Typology of Adaptive Governance in the Digital Government Context: The Role of Decision-making and Accountability

Cancan Wang, Rony Medaglia, Lei Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The notion of adaptive governance was originally created to capture forms of collaboration in socio-ecological systems that can respond to rapid changes in the environment. However, such a notion also has a great potential to be transferred and understood in the digital government context, where there is an increasing need to establish forms of collaboration that can respond to swift changes in the environment related to technology and citizen demands. Drawing on the analysis of four cases of IT-related project collaboration, we put forward that the degree of sharing of decision-making power and of accountability between government and non-government actors is critical to developing different types of adaptive governance. Findings show that the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability can be decoupled, resulting in three types of adaptive governance – namely polycentric, agile, and organic governance. We contribute to research by detailing and empirically testing the notion of adaptive governance in a digital government context, and to practice by highlighting the role of the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability in devising adaptive governance strategies.
The notion of adaptive governance was originally created to capture forms of collaboration in socio-ecological systems that can respond to rapid changes in the environment. However, such a notion also has a great potential to be transferred and understood in the digital government context, where there is an increasing need to establish forms of collaboration that can respond to swift changes in the environment related to technology and citizen demands. Drawing on the analysis of four cases of IT-related project collaboration, we put forward that the degree of sharing of decision-making power and of accountability between government and non-government actors is critical to developing different types of adaptive governance. Findings show that the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability can be decoupled, resulting in three types of adaptive governance – namely polycentric, agile, and organic governance. We contribute to research by detailing and empirically testing the notion of adaptive governance in a digital government context, and to practice by highlighting the role of the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability in devising adaptive governance strategies.
LanguageEnglish
JournalGovernment Information Quarterly
Volume35
Pages306-322
Number of pages17
ISSN0740-624X
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Bibliographical note

Published online: 5. September 2017

Keywords

  • Adaptive governance
  • Digital government
  • Decision-making
  • Accountability

Cite this

@article{a6226721218544929872d4f93107cc16,
title = "Towards a Typology of Adaptive Governance in the Digital Government Context: The Role of Decision-making and Accountability",
abstract = "The notion of adaptive governance was originally created to capture forms of collaboration in socio-ecological systems that can respond to rapid changes in the environment. However, such a notion also has a great potential to be transferred and understood in the digital government context, where there is an increasing need to establish forms of collaboration that can respond to swift changes in the environment related to technology and citizen demands. Drawing on the analysis of four cases of IT-related project collaboration, we put forward that the degree of sharing of decision-making power and of accountability between government and non-government actors is critical to developing different types of adaptive governance. Findings show that the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability can be decoupled, resulting in three types of adaptive governance – namely polycentric, agile, and organic governance. We contribute to research by detailing and empirically testing the notion of adaptive governance in a digital government context, and to practice by highlighting the role of the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability in devising adaptive governance strategies.",
keywords = "Adaptive governance, Digital government, Decision-making, Accountability, Adaptive governance, Digital government, Decision-making, Accountability",
author = "Cancan Wang and Rony Medaglia and Lei Zheng",
note = "Published online: 5. September 2017",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "306--322",
journal = "Government Information Quarterly",
issn = "0740-624X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Towards a Typology of Adaptive Governance in the Digital Government Context : The Role of Decision-making and Accountability. / Wang, Cancan; Medaglia, Rony; Zheng, Lei.

In: Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 35, 2018, p. 306-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a Typology of Adaptive Governance in the Digital Government Context

T2 - Government Information Quarterly

AU - Wang,Cancan

AU - Medaglia,Rony

AU - Zheng,Lei

N1 - Published online: 5. September 2017

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The notion of adaptive governance was originally created to capture forms of collaboration in socio-ecological systems that can respond to rapid changes in the environment. However, such a notion also has a great potential to be transferred and understood in the digital government context, where there is an increasing need to establish forms of collaboration that can respond to swift changes in the environment related to technology and citizen demands. Drawing on the analysis of four cases of IT-related project collaboration, we put forward that the degree of sharing of decision-making power and of accountability between government and non-government actors is critical to developing different types of adaptive governance. Findings show that the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability can be decoupled, resulting in three types of adaptive governance – namely polycentric, agile, and organic governance. We contribute to research by detailing and empirically testing the notion of adaptive governance in a digital government context, and to practice by highlighting the role of the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability in devising adaptive governance strategies.

AB - The notion of adaptive governance was originally created to capture forms of collaboration in socio-ecological systems that can respond to rapid changes in the environment. However, such a notion also has a great potential to be transferred and understood in the digital government context, where there is an increasing need to establish forms of collaboration that can respond to swift changes in the environment related to technology and citizen demands. Drawing on the analysis of four cases of IT-related project collaboration, we put forward that the degree of sharing of decision-making power and of accountability between government and non-government actors is critical to developing different types of adaptive governance. Findings show that the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability can be decoupled, resulting in three types of adaptive governance – namely polycentric, agile, and organic governance. We contribute to research by detailing and empirically testing the notion of adaptive governance in a digital government context, and to practice by highlighting the role of the distribution of decision-making power and of accountability in devising adaptive governance strategies.

KW - Adaptive governance

KW - Digital government

KW - Decision-making

KW - Accountability

KW - Adaptive governance

KW - Digital government

KW - Decision-making

KW - Accountability

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954925538153

U2 - 10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 306

EP - 322

JO - Government Information Quarterly

JF - Government Information Quarterly

SN - 0740-624X

ER -