Too Many Compromises: Survey Research and the Spectre of Communism

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This paper charts the influence of McCarthyism and of FBI surveillance practices on a number of prominent American social scientists, market researchers, opinion pollsters and survey research practitioners during the post-war years. Hitherto disparate sets of historical evidence on how ‘Red Scare’ tactics influenced social researchers and marketing scientists are brought together and updated with evidence from original archival research.
Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on the existing secondary literature on how social research practitioners and social scientists reacted to the unusually high pressures on academic freedom during the McCarthy era. It supplements this review with evidence obtained from archival research, including declassified FBI files. The focus of this paper is set on prominent individuals, mainly Bernard Berelson, Samuel Stouffer, Hadley Cantril, Robert S. Lynd, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Herta Herzog, Ernest Dichter, but also the Frankfurt School in exile.
Findings: Although some of the historiography presents American social scientists and practitioners in the marketing research sector as victims of McCarthyism and FBI surveillance, it can also be shown that virtually all individuals in focus here also developed strategies of accommodation, compromise and even opportunism in order to benefit from the climate of suspicion brought about by the prevailing anti-Communism.
Originality/value: Against the view of social scientists as harassed academic minority, evidence is presented in this article which shows American social scientists who researched market-related phenomena, like media, voters’ choices, and consumer behaviour, in a different light. Most importantly, this article for the first time presents archival evidence on the scale of Paul F. Lazarsfeld’s surveillance by the FBI.
Purpose: This paper charts the influence of McCarthyism and of FBI surveillance practices on a number of prominent American social scientists, market researchers, opinion pollsters and survey research practitioners during the post-war years. Hitherto disparate sets of historical evidence on how ‘Red Scare’ tactics influenced social researchers and marketing scientists are brought together and updated with evidence from original archival research.
Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on the existing secondary literature on how social research practitioners and social scientists reacted to the unusually high pressures on academic freedom during the McCarthy era. It supplements this review with evidence obtained from archival research, including declassified FBI files. The focus of this paper is set on prominent individuals, mainly Bernard Berelson, Samuel Stouffer, Hadley Cantril, Robert S. Lynd, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Herta Herzog, Ernest Dichter, but also the Frankfurt School in exile.
Findings: Although some of the historiography presents American social scientists and practitioners in the marketing research sector as victims of McCarthyism and FBI surveillance, it can also be shown that virtually all individuals in focus here also developed strategies of accommodation, compromise and even opportunism in order to benefit from the climate of suspicion brought about by the prevailing anti-Communism.
Originality/value: Against the view of social scientists as harassed academic minority, evidence is presented in this article which shows American social scientists who researched market-related phenomena, like media, voters’ choices, and consumer behaviour, in a different light. Most importantly, this article for the first time presents archival evidence on the scale of Paul F. Lazarsfeld’s surveillance by the FBI.
LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of Historical Research in Marketing
Volume8
Issue number1
Pages97-114
ISSN1755-750X
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Communism
  • Cold War
  • FBI
  • Loyality boards
  • McCarthy era
  • Paul F. Lazarsfeld

Cite this

@article{f6c161f60539488c9bc8f06f34916dfa,
title = "Too Many Compromises: Survey Research and the Spectre of Communism",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper charts the influence of McCarthyism and of FBI surveillance practices on a number of prominent American social scientists, market researchers, opinion pollsters and survey research practitioners during the post-war years. Hitherto disparate sets of historical evidence on how ‘Red Scare’ tactics influenced social researchers and marketing scientists are brought together and updated with evidence from original archival research.Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on the existing secondary literature on how social research practitioners and social scientists reacted to the unusually high pressures on academic freedom during the McCarthy era. It supplements this review with evidence obtained from archival research, including declassified FBI files. The focus of this paper is set on prominent individuals, mainly Bernard Berelson, Samuel Stouffer, Hadley Cantril, Robert S. Lynd, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Herta Herzog, Ernest Dichter, but also the Frankfurt School in exile.Findings: Although some of the historiography presents American social scientists and practitioners in the marketing research sector as victims of McCarthyism and FBI surveillance, it can also be shown that virtually all individuals in focus here also developed strategies of accommodation, compromise and even opportunism in order to benefit from the climate of suspicion brought about by the prevailing anti-Communism.Originality/value: Against the view of social scientists as harassed academic minority, evidence is presented in this article which shows American social scientists who researched market-related phenomena, like media, voters’ choices, and consumer behaviour, in a different light. Most importantly, this article for the first time presents archival evidence on the scale of Paul F. Lazarsfeld’s surveillance by the FBI.",
keywords = "Communism, Cold War, FBI, Loyality boards, McCarthy era, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Communism, Cold War, FBI, Loyality boards, McCarthy era, Paul F. Lazarsfeld",
author = "Stefan Schwarzkopf",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1108/JHRM-11-2015-0046",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "97--114",
journal = "Journal of Historical Research in Marketing",
issn = "1755-750X",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "1",

}

Too Many Compromises : Survey Research and the Spectre of Communism. / Schwarzkopf, Stefan.

In: Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2016, p. 97-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Too Many Compromises

T2 - Journal of Historical Research in Marketing

AU - Schwarzkopf,Stefan

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: This paper charts the influence of McCarthyism and of FBI surveillance practices on a number of prominent American social scientists, market researchers, opinion pollsters and survey research practitioners during the post-war years. Hitherto disparate sets of historical evidence on how ‘Red Scare’ tactics influenced social researchers and marketing scientists are brought together and updated with evidence from original archival research.Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on the existing secondary literature on how social research practitioners and social scientists reacted to the unusually high pressures on academic freedom during the McCarthy era. It supplements this review with evidence obtained from archival research, including declassified FBI files. The focus of this paper is set on prominent individuals, mainly Bernard Berelson, Samuel Stouffer, Hadley Cantril, Robert S. Lynd, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Herta Herzog, Ernest Dichter, but also the Frankfurt School in exile.Findings: Although some of the historiography presents American social scientists and practitioners in the marketing research sector as victims of McCarthyism and FBI surveillance, it can also be shown that virtually all individuals in focus here also developed strategies of accommodation, compromise and even opportunism in order to benefit from the climate of suspicion brought about by the prevailing anti-Communism.Originality/value: Against the view of social scientists as harassed academic minority, evidence is presented in this article which shows American social scientists who researched market-related phenomena, like media, voters’ choices, and consumer behaviour, in a different light. Most importantly, this article for the first time presents archival evidence on the scale of Paul F. Lazarsfeld’s surveillance by the FBI.

AB - Purpose: This paper charts the influence of McCarthyism and of FBI surveillance practices on a number of prominent American social scientists, market researchers, opinion pollsters and survey research practitioners during the post-war years. Hitherto disparate sets of historical evidence on how ‘Red Scare’ tactics influenced social researchers and marketing scientists are brought together and updated with evidence from original archival research.Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on the existing secondary literature on how social research practitioners and social scientists reacted to the unusually high pressures on academic freedom during the McCarthy era. It supplements this review with evidence obtained from archival research, including declassified FBI files. The focus of this paper is set on prominent individuals, mainly Bernard Berelson, Samuel Stouffer, Hadley Cantril, Robert S. Lynd, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Herta Herzog, Ernest Dichter, but also the Frankfurt School in exile.Findings: Although some of the historiography presents American social scientists and practitioners in the marketing research sector as victims of McCarthyism and FBI surveillance, it can also be shown that virtually all individuals in focus here also developed strategies of accommodation, compromise and even opportunism in order to benefit from the climate of suspicion brought about by the prevailing anti-Communism.Originality/value: Against the view of social scientists as harassed academic minority, evidence is presented in this article which shows American social scientists who researched market-related phenomena, like media, voters’ choices, and consumer behaviour, in a different light. Most importantly, this article for the first time presents archival evidence on the scale of Paul F. Lazarsfeld’s surveillance by the FBI.

KW - Communism

KW - Cold War

KW - FBI

KW - Loyality boards

KW - McCarthy era

KW - Paul F. Lazarsfeld

KW - Communism

KW - Cold War

KW - FBI

KW - Loyality boards

KW - McCarthy era

KW - Paul F. Lazarsfeld

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000694356&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1108/JHRM-11-2015-0046

DO - 10.1108/JHRM-11-2015-0046

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 97

EP - 114

JO - Journal of Historical Research in Marketing

JF - Journal of Historical Research in Marketing

SN - 1755-750X

IS - 1

ER -