Thinking Creatively about Creativity

What can We Learn from Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Some time ago the Hungarian scholar Istvan Magyari-Beck (1994) published a challenging article in this journal indicating weaknesses in creativity research which sparked off responses from the American scholars Teresa Amabile (1994) and Scott Isaksen (1995). While Magyari-Beck applied familiar themes from the history of science, this article borrows extensively from the latest thinking in the philosophy of science, thus continuing the debate started by Magyari-Beck at the ontological and epistemological plane. The contribution of this article lies in the fact that it uncovers some basic assumptions researchers hold about the nature of the (social) world and ways they can obtain knowledge about that world. As such it challenges orthodox ideas about “good” research and theory building.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCreativity and Innovation Management
Volume5
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)204-211
ISSN0963-1690
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{de90913e8bfb49ce8ec9b008aad17233,
title = "Thinking Creatively about Creativity: What can We Learn from Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science?",
abstract = "Some time ago the Hungarian scholar Istvan Magyari-Beck (1994) published a challenging article in this journal indicating weaknesses in creativity research which sparked off responses from the American scholars Teresa Amabile (1994) and Scott Isaksen (1995). While Magyari-Beck applied familiar themes from the history of science, this article borrows extensively from the latest thinking in the philosophy of science, thus continuing the debate started by Magyari-Beck at the ontological and epistemological plane. The contribution of this article lies in the fact that it uncovers some basic assumptions researchers hold about the nature of the (social) world and ways they can obtain knowledge about that world. As such it challenges orthodox ideas about “good” research and theory building.",
author = "{De Cock}, Christian",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8691.1996.tb00143.x",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "204--211",
journal = "Creativity and Innovation Management",
issn = "0963-1690",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "3",

}

Thinking Creatively about Creativity : What can We Learn from Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science? / De Cock, Christian .

In: Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1996, p. 204-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thinking Creatively about Creativity

T2 - What can We Learn from Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science?

AU - De Cock, Christian

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Some time ago the Hungarian scholar Istvan Magyari-Beck (1994) published a challenging article in this journal indicating weaknesses in creativity research which sparked off responses from the American scholars Teresa Amabile (1994) and Scott Isaksen (1995). While Magyari-Beck applied familiar themes from the history of science, this article borrows extensively from the latest thinking in the philosophy of science, thus continuing the debate started by Magyari-Beck at the ontological and epistemological plane. The contribution of this article lies in the fact that it uncovers some basic assumptions researchers hold about the nature of the (social) world and ways they can obtain knowledge about that world. As such it challenges orthodox ideas about “good” research and theory building.

AB - Some time ago the Hungarian scholar Istvan Magyari-Beck (1994) published a challenging article in this journal indicating weaknesses in creativity research which sparked off responses from the American scholars Teresa Amabile (1994) and Scott Isaksen (1995). While Magyari-Beck applied familiar themes from the history of science, this article borrows extensively from the latest thinking in the philosophy of science, thus continuing the debate started by Magyari-Beck at the ontological and epistemological plane. The contribution of this article lies in the fact that it uncovers some basic assumptions researchers hold about the nature of the (social) world and ways they can obtain knowledge about that world. As such it challenges orthodox ideas about “good” research and theory building.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017647103

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8691.1996.tb00143.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8691.1996.tb00143.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 204

EP - 211

JO - Creativity and Innovation Management

JF - Creativity and Innovation Management

SN - 0963-1690

IS - 3

ER -