The Wider Implications of Business-model Research

Thomas Ritter, Christopher Lettl

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Business-model research has struggled to develop a clear footprint in the strategic management field. This introduction to the special issue on the wider implications of business-model research argues that part of this struggle relates to the application of five different perspectives on the term “business model,” which creates ambiguity about the conceptual boundaries of business models, the applied terminology, and the potential contributions of business-model research to strategic management literature. By explicitly distinguishing among these five perspectives and by aligning them into one overarching, comprehensive framework, this paper offers a foundation for consolidating business-model research. Furthermore, we explore the connections between business-model research and prominent theories in strategic management. We conclude that business-model research is not necessarily a “theory on its own” and that it can be more fruitfully understood as a theoretical mechanism for combining different literature streams. As such, business-model research is positioned as a central connecting component in the further development of the strategic management field.
Original languageEnglish
JournalLong Range Planning
Volume51
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
ISSN0024-6301
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Keywords

  • Alignment
  • Archetype
  • Business model
  • Definition
  • Logics
  • Typology

Cite this

Ritter, Thomas ; Lettl, Christopher. / The Wider Implications of Business-model Research. In: Long Range Planning. 2018 ; Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 1-8.
@article{d70e422868144f58a0b2f9431c2e0f47,
title = "The Wider Implications of Business-model Research",
abstract = "Business-model research has struggled to develop a clear footprint in the strategic management field. This introduction to the special issue on the wider implications of business-model research argues that part of this struggle relates to the application of five different perspectives on the term “business model,” which creates ambiguity about the conceptual boundaries of business models, the applied terminology, and the potential contributions of business-model research to strategic management literature. By explicitly distinguishing among these five perspectives and by aligning them into one overarching, comprehensive framework, this paper offers a foundation for consolidating business-model research. Furthermore, we explore the connections between business-model research and prominent theories in strategic management. We conclude that business-model research is not necessarily a “theory on its own” and that it can be more fruitfully understood as a theoretical mechanism for combining different literature streams. As such, business-model research is positioned as a central connecting component in the further development of the strategic management field.",
keywords = "Alignment, Archetype, Business model, Definition, Logics, Typology, Alignment, Archetype, Business model, Definition, Logics, Typology",
author = "Thomas Ritter and Christopher Lettl",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.005",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Long Range Planning",
issn = "0024-6301",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "1",

}

The Wider Implications of Business-model Research. / Ritter, Thomas; Lettl, Christopher.

In: Long Range Planning, Vol. 51, No. 1, 02.2018, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Wider Implications of Business-model Research

AU - Ritter, Thomas

AU - Lettl, Christopher

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - Business-model research has struggled to develop a clear footprint in the strategic management field. This introduction to the special issue on the wider implications of business-model research argues that part of this struggle relates to the application of five different perspectives on the term “business model,” which creates ambiguity about the conceptual boundaries of business models, the applied terminology, and the potential contributions of business-model research to strategic management literature. By explicitly distinguishing among these five perspectives and by aligning them into one overarching, comprehensive framework, this paper offers a foundation for consolidating business-model research. Furthermore, we explore the connections between business-model research and prominent theories in strategic management. We conclude that business-model research is not necessarily a “theory on its own” and that it can be more fruitfully understood as a theoretical mechanism for combining different literature streams. As such, business-model research is positioned as a central connecting component in the further development of the strategic management field.

AB - Business-model research has struggled to develop a clear footprint in the strategic management field. This introduction to the special issue on the wider implications of business-model research argues that part of this struggle relates to the application of five different perspectives on the term “business model,” which creates ambiguity about the conceptual boundaries of business models, the applied terminology, and the potential contributions of business-model research to strategic management literature. By explicitly distinguishing among these five perspectives and by aligning them into one overarching, comprehensive framework, this paper offers a foundation for consolidating business-model research. Furthermore, we explore the connections between business-model research and prominent theories in strategic management. We conclude that business-model research is not necessarily a “theory on its own” and that it can be more fruitfully understood as a theoretical mechanism for combining different literature streams. As such, business-model research is positioned as a central connecting component in the further development of the strategic management field.

KW - Alignment

KW - Archetype

KW - Business model

KW - Definition

KW - Logics

KW - Typology

KW - Alignment

KW - Archetype

KW - Business model

KW - Definition

KW - Logics

KW - Typology

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921351303&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.005

M3 - Journal article

VL - 51

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Long Range Planning

JF - Long Range Planning

SN - 0024-6301

IS - 1

ER -