The United Nations' (UN) Decision to Adopt International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS)

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse and understand the UN System’s adoption of IPSAS from a legitimacy perspective. Design/methodology/approach: A content analysis of publicly accessible documents from the UN System archives was conducted. The analysis was framed through the broader lens of legitimacy theory, drawing attention to the rationalities of decisions taken. Findings: This study illustrated how the need for accounting reforms was rationalised throughout the UN System of organisations. Decision-making processes were reflective of political concerns and the accompanying need to continually demonstrate accountability. The discursive strategies observed associated the need to improve accountability with the adoption of globally recognised accounting systems. However, such logic assumed that existing accountability deficits were intrinsically linked to accounting failures, which overemphasises accounting’s role. Social implications: The UN System’s decision to adopt IPSAS in 2006 has been followed by a substantial increase in the number of Member States following suit. However, governments and other organisations considering IPSAS adoption should be aware of the historical context in which the UN System’s decision was made. Originality/value: This study addresses a lacuna in empirical studies providing an understanding of the role of accounting reforms within international organisations such as the UN System.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management
Volume31
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)285-306
Number of pages22
ISSN1096-3367
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Published online: 4. April 2019

Keywords

  • IPSAS
  • Public sector accounting
  • Reforms
  • Legitimation
  • United Nations

Cite this

@article{8ea1e65c435c4b3c80350799495b5193,
title = "The United Nations' (UN) Decision to Adopt International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS)",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse and understand the UN System’s adoption of IPSAS from a legitimacy perspective. Design/methodology/approach: A content analysis of publicly accessible documents from the UN System archives was conducted. The analysis was framed through the broader lens of legitimacy theory, drawing attention to the rationalities of decisions taken. Findings: This study illustrated how the need for accounting reforms was rationalised throughout the UN System of organisations. Decision-making processes were reflective of political concerns and the accompanying need to continually demonstrate accountability. The discursive strategies observed associated the need to improve accountability with the adoption of globally recognised accounting systems. However, such logic assumed that existing accountability deficits were intrinsically linked to accounting failures, which overemphasises accounting’s role. Social implications: The UN System’s decision to adopt IPSAS in 2006 has been followed by a substantial increase in the number of Member States following suit. However, governments and other organisations considering IPSAS adoption should be aware of the historical context in which the UN System’s decision was made. Originality/value: This study addresses a lacuna in empirical studies providing an understanding of the role of accounting reforms within international organisations such as the UN System.",
keywords = "IPSAS, Public sector accounting, Reforms, Legitimation, United Nations, IPSAS, Public sector accounting, Reforms, Legitimation, United Nations",
author = "Danny Chow and Pontoppidan, {Caroline Aggestam}",
note = "Published online: 4. April 2019",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1108/JPBAFM-08-2018-0087",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "285--306",
journal = "Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management",
issn = "1096-3367",
publisher = "PrAcademics Press",
number = "2",

}

The United Nations' (UN) Decision to Adopt International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). / Chow, Danny; Pontoppidan, Caroline Aggestam.

In: Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2019, p. 285-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The United Nations' (UN) Decision to Adopt International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS)

AU - Chow, Danny

AU - Pontoppidan, Caroline Aggestam

N1 - Published online: 4. April 2019

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse and understand the UN System’s adoption of IPSAS from a legitimacy perspective. Design/methodology/approach: A content analysis of publicly accessible documents from the UN System archives was conducted. The analysis was framed through the broader lens of legitimacy theory, drawing attention to the rationalities of decisions taken. Findings: This study illustrated how the need for accounting reforms was rationalised throughout the UN System of organisations. Decision-making processes were reflective of political concerns and the accompanying need to continually demonstrate accountability. The discursive strategies observed associated the need to improve accountability with the adoption of globally recognised accounting systems. However, such logic assumed that existing accountability deficits were intrinsically linked to accounting failures, which overemphasises accounting’s role. Social implications: The UN System’s decision to adopt IPSAS in 2006 has been followed by a substantial increase in the number of Member States following suit. However, governments and other organisations considering IPSAS adoption should be aware of the historical context in which the UN System’s decision was made. Originality/value: This study addresses a lacuna in empirical studies providing an understanding of the role of accounting reforms within international organisations such as the UN System.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse and understand the UN System’s adoption of IPSAS from a legitimacy perspective. Design/methodology/approach: A content analysis of publicly accessible documents from the UN System archives was conducted. The analysis was framed through the broader lens of legitimacy theory, drawing attention to the rationalities of decisions taken. Findings: This study illustrated how the need for accounting reforms was rationalised throughout the UN System of organisations. Decision-making processes were reflective of political concerns and the accompanying need to continually demonstrate accountability. The discursive strategies observed associated the need to improve accountability with the adoption of globally recognised accounting systems. However, such logic assumed that existing accountability deficits were intrinsically linked to accounting failures, which overemphasises accounting’s role. Social implications: The UN System’s decision to adopt IPSAS in 2006 has been followed by a substantial increase in the number of Member States following suit. However, governments and other organisations considering IPSAS adoption should be aware of the historical context in which the UN System’s decision was made. Originality/value: This study addresses a lacuna in empirical studies providing an understanding of the role of accounting reforms within international organisations such as the UN System.

KW - IPSAS

KW - Public sector accounting

KW - Reforms

KW - Legitimation

KW - United Nations

KW - IPSAS

KW - Public sector accounting

KW - Reforms

KW - Legitimation

KW - United Nations

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921427652&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1108/JPBAFM-08-2018-0087

DO - 10.1108/JPBAFM-08-2018-0087

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 285

EP - 306

JO - Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management

JF - Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management

SN - 1096-3367

IS - 2

ER -