The Transfigurability of Digital Objects

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Due to the rise of the internet and digitality, an increasing degree of cultural heritage takes the form of ICT enabled operations contradicting the traditional practices of archives. Referring to these new forms as digital objects, the paper presents them as being transfigurable based on the dimensions of editability, interactivity, openness and distributedness and on the highly modular and granular texture of binary media and ICT processes. In other words, digital objects are technological operations rather than fixed entities. They are fluid, amorphous and ephemeral, rendered as momentary proxies of objects only. Within this context, a key challenge for cultural heritage institutions is the taming of digital objects. Juxtaposing two extreme examples – the search engine results page and the archival snap-shot of a web page – the paper will conclude with the argument that persistency does not come with the digital object, but needs to be imposed ex-post through second-order technologies which themselves are based on the paradigm of transfigurability. In other words, while the persistency of material objects has to be preserved, the persistency of digital objects has to be produced.
Original languageEnglish
JournalArtnodes
Volume2010
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)62-68
Number of pages7
ISSN1695-5951
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Marton, Attila. / The Transfigurability of Digital Objects. In: Artnodes. 2010 ; Vol. 2010, No. 10. pp. 62-68.
@article{765497cbd44f456196bc8d9f0bfc0ce3,
title = "The Transfigurability of Digital Objects",
abstract = "Due to the rise of the internet and digitality, an increasing degree of cultural heritage takes the form of ICT enabled operations contradicting the traditional practices of archives. Referring to these new forms as digital objects, the paper presents them as being transfigurable based on the dimensions of editability, interactivity, openness and distributedness and on the highly modular and granular texture of binary media and ICT processes. In other words, digital objects are technological operations rather than fixed entities. They are fluid, amorphous and ephemeral, rendered as momentary proxies of objects only. Within this context, a key challenge for cultural heritage institutions is the taming of digital objects. Juxtaposing two extreme examples – the search engine results page and the archival snap-shot of a web page – the paper will conclude with the argument that persistency does not come with the digital object, but needs to be imposed ex-post through second-order technologies which themselves are based on the paradigm of transfigurability. In other words, while the persistency of material objects has to be preserved, the persistency of digital objects has to be produced.",
keywords = "Digital objects, Preservation, Archives, Persistency, Ephemera",
author = "Attila Marton",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "2010",
pages = "62--68",
journal = "Artnodes",
issn = "1695-5951",
publisher = "Universitat Oberta de Catalunya",
number = "10",

}

Marton, A 2010, 'The Transfigurability of Digital Objects', Artnodes, vol. 2010, no. 10, pp. 62-68.

The Transfigurability of Digital Objects. / Marton, Attila.

In: Artnodes, Vol. 2010, No. 10, 2010, p. 62-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Transfigurability of Digital Objects

AU - Marton, Attila

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Due to the rise of the internet and digitality, an increasing degree of cultural heritage takes the form of ICT enabled operations contradicting the traditional practices of archives. Referring to these new forms as digital objects, the paper presents them as being transfigurable based on the dimensions of editability, interactivity, openness and distributedness and on the highly modular and granular texture of binary media and ICT processes. In other words, digital objects are technological operations rather than fixed entities. They are fluid, amorphous and ephemeral, rendered as momentary proxies of objects only. Within this context, a key challenge for cultural heritage institutions is the taming of digital objects. Juxtaposing two extreme examples – the search engine results page and the archival snap-shot of a web page – the paper will conclude with the argument that persistency does not come with the digital object, but needs to be imposed ex-post through second-order technologies which themselves are based on the paradigm of transfigurability. In other words, while the persistency of material objects has to be preserved, the persistency of digital objects has to be produced.

AB - Due to the rise of the internet and digitality, an increasing degree of cultural heritage takes the form of ICT enabled operations contradicting the traditional practices of archives. Referring to these new forms as digital objects, the paper presents them as being transfigurable based on the dimensions of editability, interactivity, openness and distributedness and on the highly modular and granular texture of binary media and ICT processes. In other words, digital objects are technological operations rather than fixed entities. They are fluid, amorphous and ephemeral, rendered as momentary proxies of objects only. Within this context, a key challenge for cultural heritage institutions is the taming of digital objects. Juxtaposing two extreme examples – the search engine results page and the archival snap-shot of a web page – the paper will conclude with the argument that persistency does not come with the digital object, but needs to be imposed ex-post through second-order technologies which themselves are based on the paradigm of transfigurability. In other words, while the persistency of material objects has to be preserved, the persistency of digital objects has to be produced.

KW - Digital objects

KW - Preservation

KW - Archives

KW - Persistency

KW - Ephemera

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2010

SP - 62

EP - 68

JO - Artnodes

JF - Artnodes

SN - 1695-5951

IS - 10

ER -