The Spectacle and Organization Studies

Mikkel Flyverbom, Juliane Reinecke

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

328 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to revisit Guy Debord’s critical theory of the spectacle as formulated 50 years ago in the ‘Society of the Spectacle’ in light of the contemporary production of spectacles. Debord’s arguments about appearance, visibility and celebrity are echoed in the way organizations increasingly focus on their brand, image, impression, and reputation. Yet, the role of spectacles in organizational life has remained under-researched in organization studies. As the boundaries between fact and fiction, reality and representation, substance and appearance become increasingly blurred, questions about the production and effects of spectacles seem more pertinent than ever. Are representations faithful mirrors of reality, or attempts to conceal reality? Do they replace reality, or bring new realities into being? By articulating three possible understandings of the spectacle, as fetishism, hyper-reality or performativity, this essay invites organization scholars to examine the organization of the real and the making of organizations through processes of spectacular representation including discursive practices, visual images and theatrical performances.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOrganization Studies
Volume38
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)1625–1643
Number of pages19
ISSN0170-8406
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Commodity fetishism
  • Debord
  • Hyper-reality
  • Image
  • Marxism
  • Performativity
  • Representation
  • Situationist movement
  • Visibilities

Cite this

Flyverbom, Mikkel ; Reinecke, Juliane. / The Spectacle and Organization Studies. In: Organization Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 38, No. 11. pp. 1625–1643.
@article{0d03084e49e847deb8a03f3a1dc19cd5,
title = "The Spectacle and Organization Studies",
abstract = "The aim of this essay is to revisit Guy Debord’s critical theory of the spectacle as formulated 50 years ago in the ‘Society of the Spectacle’ in light of the contemporary production of spectacles. Debord’s arguments about appearance, visibility and celebrity are echoed in the way organizations increasingly focus on their brand, image, impression, and reputation. Yet, the role of spectacles in organizational life has remained under-researched in organization studies. As the boundaries between fact and fiction, reality and representation, substance and appearance become increasingly blurred, questions about the production and effects of spectacles seem more pertinent than ever. Are representations faithful mirrors of reality, or attempts to conceal reality? Do they replace reality, or bring new realities into being? By articulating three possible understandings of the spectacle, as fetishism, hyper-reality or performativity, this essay invites organization scholars to examine the organization of the real and the making of organizations through processes of spectacular representation including discursive practices, visual images and theatrical performances.",
keywords = "Commodity fetishism, Debord, Hyper-reality, Image, Marxism, Performativity, Representation, Situationist movement, Visibilities, Commodity fetishism, Debord, Hyper-reality, Image, Marxism, Performativity, Representation, Situationist movement, Visibilities",
author = "Mikkel Flyverbom and Juliane Reinecke",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/0170840616685366",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1625–1643",
journal = "Organization Studies",
issn = "0170-8406",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd.",
number = "11",

}

The Spectacle and Organization Studies. / Flyverbom, Mikkel; Reinecke, Juliane.

In: Organization Studies, Vol. 38, No. 11, 11.2017, p. 1625–1643.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Spectacle and Organization Studies

AU - Flyverbom, Mikkel

AU - Reinecke, Juliane

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - The aim of this essay is to revisit Guy Debord’s critical theory of the spectacle as formulated 50 years ago in the ‘Society of the Spectacle’ in light of the contemporary production of spectacles. Debord’s arguments about appearance, visibility and celebrity are echoed in the way organizations increasingly focus on their brand, image, impression, and reputation. Yet, the role of spectacles in organizational life has remained under-researched in organization studies. As the boundaries between fact and fiction, reality and representation, substance and appearance become increasingly blurred, questions about the production and effects of spectacles seem more pertinent than ever. Are representations faithful mirrors of reality, or attempts to conceal reality? Do they replace reality, or bring new realities into being? By articulating three possible understandings of the spectacle, as fetishism, hyper-reality or performativity, this essay invites organization scholars to examine the organization of the real and the making of organizations through processes of spectacular representation including discursive practices, visual images and theatrical performances.

AB - The aim of this essay is to revisit Guy Debord’s critical theory of the spectacle as formulated 50 years ago in the ‘Society of the Spectacle’ in light of the contemporary production of spectacles. Debord’s arguments about appearance, visibility and celebrity are echoed in the way organizations increasingly focus on their brand, image, impression, and reputation. Yet, the role of spectacles in organizational life has remained under-researched in organization studies. As the boundaries between fact and fiction, reality and representation, substance and appearance become increasingly blurred, questions about the production and effects of spectacles seem more pertinent than ever. Are representations faithful mirrors of reality, or attempts to conceal reality? Do they replace reality, or bring new realities into being? By articulating three possible understandings of the spectacle, as fetishism, hyper-reality or performativity, this essay invites organization scholars to examine the organization of the real and the making of organizations through processes of spectacular representation including discursive practices, visual images and theatrical performances.

KW - Commodity fetishism

KW - Debord

KW - Hyper-reality

KW - Image

KW - Marxism

KW - Performativity

KW - Representation

KW - Situationist movement

KW - Visibilities

KW - Commodity fetishism

KW - Debord

KW - Hyper-reality

KW - Image

KW - Marxism

KW - Performativity

KW - Representation

KW - Situationist movement

KW - Visibilities

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921376726

U2 - 10.1177/0170840616685366

DO - 10.1177/0170840616685366

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 1625

EP - 1643

JO - Organization Studies

JF - Organization Studies

SN - 0170-8406

IS - 11

ER -