The Signature of Power

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This concept of power keeps referring its users to a domain of apparent antinomies, which from a formal theoretical perspective are in turn construed as unities in opposition to further terms. Three such sequences are ‘power to’ and ‘power over’, power as capacity and as right, and juridical conceptions of sovereignty and ‘economic’ conceptions of government. This movement of opposition, unity and renewed opposition is however the signature of the concept of power, which, instead of being transcended or neutralised, must be kept in play in its analysis. As a consequence of the view that there is no essence of power, the paper further argues for a substantive rather than formal approach to power in which the analysis of power proceeds by paradigmatic cases, analogies and exemplars. The work of Ernst H. Kantorowicz, Michel Foucault, Max Weber and Giorgio Agamben helps to elucidate this approach.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Political Power
Volume5
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)101-117
ISSN2158-3803
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Dean, Mitchell. / The Signature of Power. In: Journal of Political Power. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 101-117.
@article{38c9de154bbc447db2c3266c94634896,
title = "The Signature of Power",
abstract = "This concept of power keeps referring its users to a domain of apparent antinomies, which from a formal theoretical perspective are in turn construed as unities in opposition to further terms. Three such sequences are ‘power to’ and ‘power over’, power as capacity and as right, and juridical conceptions of sovereignty and ‘economic’ conceptions of government. This movement of opposition, unity and renewed opposition is however the signature of the concept of power, which, instead of being transcended or neutralised, must be kept in play in its analysis. As a consequence of the view that there is no essence of power, the paper further argues for a substantive rather than formal approach to power in which the analysis of power proceeds by paradigmatic cases, analogies and exemplars. The work of Ernst H. Kantorowicz, Michel Foucault, Max Weber and Giorgio Agamben helps to elucidate this approach.",
author = "Mitchell Dean",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/ 2158379X.2012.659864",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "101--117",
journal = "Journal of Political Power",
issn = "2158-3803",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

The Signature of Power. / Dean, Mitchell.

In: Journal of Political Power, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2012, p. 101-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Signature of Power

AU - Dean, Mitchell

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This concept of power keeps referring its users to a domain of apparent antinomies, which from a formal theoretical perspective are in turn construed as unities in opposition to further terms. Three such sequences are ‘power to’ and ‘power over’, power as capacity and as right, and juridical conceptions of sovereignty and ‘economic’ conceptions of government. This movement of opposition, unity and renewed opposition is however the signature of the concept of power, which, instead of being transcended or neutralised, must be kept in play in its analysis. As a consequence of the view that there is no essence of power, the paper further argues for a substantive rather than formal approach to power in which the analysis of power proceeds by paradigmatic cases, analogies and exemplars. The work of Ernst H. Kantorowicz, Michel Foucault, Max Weber and Giorgio Agamben helps to elucidate this approach.

AB - This concept of power keeps referring its users to a domain of apparent antinomies, which from a formal theoretical perspective are in turn construed as unities in opposition to further terms. Three such sequences are ‘power to’ and ‘power over’, power as capacity and as right, and juridical conceptions of sovereignty and ‘economic’ conceptions of government. This movement of opposition, unity and renewed opposition is however the signature of the concept of power, which, instead of being transcended or neutralised, must be kept in play in its analysis. As a consequence of the view that there is no essence of power, the paper further argues for a substantive rather than formal approach to power in which the analysis of power proceeds by paradigmatic cases, analogies and exemplars. The work of Ernst H. Kantorowicz, Michel Foucault, Max Weber and Giorgio Agamben helps to elucidate this approach.

U2 - 10.1080/ 2158379X.2012.659864

DO - 10.1080/ 2158379X.2012.659864

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 101

EP - 117

JO - Journal of Political Power

JF - Journal of Political Power

SN - 2158-3803

IS - 1

ER -