Abstract
In this issue Bauerschmidt critiques a recent Strategic Management Journal paper dealing with the absence of strategy. In this paper (Inkpen and Choudhury, 1995), we argued that strategy absence should be viewed as a legitimate phenomenon of interest. Bauerschmidt maintained that we failed to instill a new strategy paradigm and challenged our arguments as a rhetorical ploy. Unfortunately, Bauerschmidt misinterpreted our intended message. Although we challenged the conventional wisdom that every firm must have an articulated strategy, instilling a new paradigm was not our objective. Our main argument was that the concept of absence may help strategy researchers better understand existing paradigms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Strategic Management Journal |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Pages (from-to) | 669-670 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| ISSN | 0143-2095 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Oct 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Strategy absence