The Roles of Representations in Building Design

Materiality and Visualisation

Chris Harty, Kjell Tryggestad

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Mock-ups, scale models and drawings are ubiquitous in building design processes, circulating between various stakeholders. They contribute to the gradual evolution of design, but what else can specific material representations do for the building design and project? The full scale model of a hospital single bed room can be different in terms of detail and medium, but in what sense might it perform different and similar functions? The mobilization of multiple forms of representations and visualizations suggest that design materialization might have several important roles to play in negotiating the building design and project, including in the exposition and resolution of controversy in the design process. The paper compares the use of two different forms of representation of the same imagined space – a single room in a hospital, and produced for similar purposes – to ascertain what the optimum (or minimum) spatial requirements should be to allow effective care of patients. The first representation is a three dimensional augmented reality model of a single room for a new hospital in the
UK, using a CAVE (Cave Automatic Virtual Environment) where the room is reproduced virtually at one-to-one scale, and which can be explored or navigated
using head-tracker technology and a joystick controller. The second is a physical
mock up of a single room for a Danish hospital where actual medical procedures are simulated using real equipment and real people. Drawing on Latour’s concepts of matters of concern and matters of fact, we compare these two representations to provide insights into the way different media produce specific senses of the design or imagined space, with consequences for on-going design work, and for the settling of controversy.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012
EditorsSimon Smith
Volume1
Place of PublicationReading
PublisherARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management
Publication date2012
Pages45-55
ISBN (Print)9780955239069
Publication statusPublished - 2012
EventThe 28th ARCOM Annual Conference - Our Dynamic Earth and University of Edinburgh, Edingburg, United Kingdom
Duration: 3 Sep 20125 Sep 2012
Conference number: 28
http://arcom.lboro.ac.uk/

Conference

ConferenceThe 28th ARCOM Annual Conference
Number28
Location Our Dynamic Earth and University of Edinburgh
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityEdingburg
Period03/09/201205/09/2012
Internet address

Cite this

Harty, C., & Tryggestad, K. (2012). The Roles of Representations in Building Design: Materiality and Visualisation. In S. Smith (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012 (Vol. 1, pp. 45-55). Reading: ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management.
Harty, Chris ; Tryggestad, Kjell. / The Roles of Representations in Building Design : Materiality and Visualisation. Proceedings of the 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012. editor / Simon Smith. Vol. 1 Reading : ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 2012. pp. 45-55
@inproceedings{af9ca80ffa404e3695ff05c53dab9ee9,
title = "The Roles of Representations in Building Design: Materiality and Visualisation",
abstract = "Mock-ups, scale models and drawings are ubiquitous in building design processes, circulating between various stakeholders. They contribute to the gradual evolution of design, but what else can specific material representations do for the building design and project? The full scale model of a hospital single bed room can be different in terms of detail and medium, but in what sense might it perform different and similar functions? The mobilization of multiple forms of representations and visualizations suggest that design materialization might have several important roles to play in negotiating the building design and project, including in the exposition and resolution of controversy in the design process. The paper compares the use of two different forms of representation of the same imagined space – a single room in a hospital, and produced for similar purposes – to ascertain what the optimum (or minimum) spatial requirements should be to allow effective care of patients. The first representation is a three dimensional augmented reality model of a single room for a new hospital in theUK, using a CAVE (Cave Automatic Virtual Environment) where the room is reproduced virtually at one-to-one scale, and which can be explored or navigatedusing head-tracker technology and a joystick controller. The second is a physicalmock up of a single room for a Danish hospital where actual medical procedures are simulated using real equipment and real people. Drawing on Latour’s concepts of matters of concern and matters of fact, we compare these two representations to provide insights into the way different media produce specific senses of the design or imagined space, with consequences for on-going design work, and for the settling of controversy.",
keywords = "Simulation, Hospital design, Matters of concern",
author = "Chris Harty and Kjell Tryggestad",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780955239069",
volume = "1",
pages = "45--55",
editor = "Simon Smith",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012",
publisher = "ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management",

}

Harty, C & Tryggestad, K 2012, The Roles of Representations in Building Design: Materiality and Visualisation. in S Smith (ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012. vol. 1, ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Reading, pp. 45-55, Edingburg, United Kingdom, 03/09/2012.

The Roles of Representations in Building Design : Materiality and Visualisation. / Harty, Chris; Tryggestad, Kjell.

Proceedings of the 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012. ed. / Simon Smith. Vol. 1 Reading : ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, 2012. p. 45-55.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - The Roles of Representations in Building Design

T2 - Materiality and Visualisation

AU - Harty, Chris

AU - Tryggestad, Kjell

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Mock-ups, scale models and drawings are ubiquitous in building design processes, circulating between various stakeholders. They contribute to the gradual evolution of design, but what else can specific material representations do for the building design and project? The full scale model of a hospital single bed room can be different in terms of detail and medium, but in what sense might it perform different and similar functions? The mobilization of multiple forms of representations and visualizations suggest that design materialization might have several important roles to play in negotiating the building design and project, including in the exposition and resolution of controversy in the design process. The paper compares the use of two different forms of representation of the same imagined space – a single room in a hospital, and produced for similar purposes – to ascertain what the optimum (or minimum) spatial requirements should be to allow effective care of patients. The first representation is a three dimensional augmented reality model of a single room for a new hospital in theUK, using a CAVE (Cave Automatic Virtual Environment) where the room is reproduced virtually at one-to-one scale, and which can be explored or navigatedusing head-tracker technology and a joystick controller. The second is a physicalmock up of a single room for a Danish hospital where actual medical procedures are simulated using real equipment and real people. Drawing on Latour’s concepts of matters of concern and matters of fact, we compare these two representations to provide insights into the way different media produce specific senses of the design or imagined space, with consequences for on-going design work, and for the settling of controversy.

AB - Mock-ups, scale models and drawings are ubiquitous in building design processes, circulating between various stakeholders. They contribute to the gradual evolution of design, but what else can specific material representations do for the building design and project? The full scale model of a hospital single bed room can be different in terms of detail and medium, but in what sense might it perform different and similar functions? The mobilization of multiple forms of representations and visualizations suggest that design materialization might have several important roles to play in negotiating the building design and project, including in the exposition and resolution of controversy in the design process. The paper compares the use of two different forms of representation of the same imagined space – a single room in a hospital, and produced for similar purposes – to ascertain what the optimum (or minimum) spatial requirements should be to allow effective care of patients. The first representation is a three dimensional augmented reality model of a single room for a new hospital in theUK, using a CAVE (Cave Automatic Virtual Environment) where the room is reproduced virtually at one-to-one scale, and which can be explored or navigatedusing head-tracker technology and a joystick controller. The second is a physicalmock up of a single room for a Danish hospital where actual medical procedures are simulated using real equipment and real people. Drawing on Latour’s concepts of matters of concern and matters of fact, we compare these two representations to provide insights into the way different media produce specific senses of the design or imagined space, with consequences for on-going design work, and for the settling of controversy.

KW - Simulation

KW - Hospital design

KW - Matters of concern

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 9780955239069

VL - 1

SP - 45

EP - 55

BT - Proceedings of the 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012

A2 - Smith, Simon

PB - ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management

CY - Reading

ER -

Harty C, Tryggestad K. The Roles of Representations in Building Design: Materiality and Visualisation. In Smith S, editor, Proceedings of the 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012. Vol. 1. Reading: ARCOM, Association of Researchers in Construction Management. 2012. p. 45-55