The Role of Theory Adaptation in the Making of a Reference Discipline

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Information Systems (IS) scholars repeatedly debate the nature of the IS discipline. A series of articles have debated whether the IS field has become a reference discipline. While many scholars have argued this question from a perceptual point of view, we address it by examining the role of theory adaptation in the making of a reference discipline. Based on a review of how the sensemaking theory from organization studies is adapted and used in IS research, we show that papers that adapt and use sensemaking theory as a central construct in the theoretical framework – in other words – engaging in theory adaptation, have a higher probability of being referenced by other disciplines. Finally, we discuss the implications of the manner in which IS scholars borrow theory regarding the IS discipline's prospects of becoming a reference discipline.
Information Systems (IS) scholars repeatedly debate the nature of the IS discipline. A series of articles have debated whether the IS field has become a reference discipline. While many scholars have argued this question from a perceptual point of view, we address it by examining the role of theory adaptation in the making of a reference discipline. Based on a review of how the sensemaking theory from organization studies is adapted and used in IS research, we show that papers that adapt and use sensemaking theory as a central construct in the theoretical framework – in other words – engaging in theory adaptation, have a higher probability of being referenced by other disciplines. Finally, we discuss the implications of the manner in which IS scholars borrow theory regarding the IS discipline's prospects of becoming a reference discipline.
LanguageEnglish
JournalInformation and Organization
Volume25
Issue number3
Pages137-149
ISSN1471-7727
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Reference discipline
  • Theory adaptation
  • Information systems research
  • Sensemaking theory

Cite this

@article{a715c0b8348e49f29e25adb5cf8c5839,
title = "The Role of Theory Adaptation in the Making of a Reference Discipline",
abstract = "Information Systems (IS) scholars repeatedly debate the nature of the IS discipline. A series of articles have debated whether the IS field has become a reference discipline. While many scholars have argued this question from a perceptual point of view, we address it by examining the role of theory adaptation in the making of a reference discipline. Based on a review of how the sensemaking theory from organization studies is adapted and used in IS research, we show that papers that adapt and use sensemaking theory as a central construct in the theoretical framework – in other words – engaging in theory adaptation, have a higher probability of being referenced by other disciplines. Finally, we discuss the implications of the manner in which IS scholars borrow theory regarding the IS discipline's prospects of becoming a reference discipline.",
keywords = "Reference discipline, Theory adaptation, Information systems research, Sensemaking theory, Reference discipline, Theory adaptation, Information systems research, Sensemaking theory",
author = "Annemette Kj{\ae}rgaard and Vendel{\o}, {Morten Thanning}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.infoandorg.2015.04.002",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "137--149",
journal = "Information and Organization",
issn = "1471-7727",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",
number = "3",

}

The Role of Theory Adaptation in the Making of a Reference Discipline. / Kjærgaard, Annemette; Vendelø, Morten Thanning.

In: Information and Organization, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2015, p. 137-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Theory Adaptation in the Making of a Reference Discipline

AU - Kjærgaard,Annemette

AU - Vendelø,Morten Thanning

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Information Systems (IS) scholars repeatedly debate the nature of the IS discipline. A series of articles have debated whether the IS field has become a reference discipline. While many scholars have argued this question from a perceptual point of view, we address it by examining the role of theory adaptation in the making of a reference discipline. Based on a review of how the sensemaking theory from organization studies is adapted and used in IS research, we show that papers that adapt and use sensemaking theory as a central construct in the theoretical framework – in other words – engaging in theory adaptation, have a higher probability of being referenced by other disciplines. Finally, we discuss the implications of the manner in which IS scholars borrow theory regarding the IS discipline's prospects of becoming a reference discipline.

AB - Information Systems (IS) scholars repeatedly debate the nature of the IS discipline. A series of articles have debated whether the IS field has become a reference discipline. While many scholars have argued this question from a perceptual point of view, we address it by examining the role of theory adaptation in the making of a reference discipline. Based on a review of how the sensemaking theory from organization studies is adapted and used in IS research, we show that papers that adapt and use sensemaking theory as a central construct in the theoretical framework – in other words – engaging in theory adaptation, have a higher probability of being referenced by other disciplines. Finally, we discuss the implications of the manner in which IS scholars borrow theory regarding the IS discipline's prospects of becoming a reference discipline.

KW - Reference discipline

KW - Theory adaptation

KW - Information systems research

KW - Sensemaking theory

KW - Reference discipline

KW - Theory adaptation

KW - Information systems research

KW - Sensemaking theory

UR - http://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=110981583600948&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2015.04.002

DO - 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2015.04.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 137

EP - 149

JO - Information and Organization

T2 - Information and Organization

JF - Information and Organization

SN - 1471-7727

IS - 3

ER -