Abstract
Recently, consistent measures of the ex-post covariation of financial assets based on noisy high-frequency data have been proposed. A related strand of literature focuses on dynamic models and covariance forecasting for high-frequency data based covariance measures. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether more sophisticated estimation approaches lead to more precise covariance forecasts, both in a statistical precision sense and in terms of economic value. A further issue, we address, is the relative importance of the quality of the realized measure as an input in a given forecasting model vs. the model's dynamic specification. The main finding is that the largest gains result from switching from daily to high-frequency data. Further gains are achieved if a simple sparse sampling covariance measure is replaced with a more efficient and noise-robust estimator.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Empirical Finance |
| Volume | 20 |
| Pages (from-to) | 83-95 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| ISSN | 0927-5398 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Forecast evaluation
- Volatility forecasting
- Portfolio optimization
- Mean-variance analysis
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver