The Role of Photograph Aesthetics on Online Review Sites: Effects of Management- versus Traveler-generated Photos on Tourists’ Decision Making

Ben Marder, Antonia Erz, Robert Angell, Kirk Plangger

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Tourists searching for information about destinations on online review sites are concurrently exposed to two different photograph aesthetics, professional (produced by destination managers) and amateur (generated by travelers). While the former is glossy and sharp, the latter is often grainy and overexposed. Although aesthetics are important factors in tourist decision making, the effects of the exposure to both types of photograph aesthetics remain largely unexamined. This research investigates how both types of aesthetics, either singularly or in combination, affect a destination’s visual appeal and tourists’ booking intentions through four controlled experiments (N = 1,282). Our results show that despite the “messy” beauty in amateur aesthetics, photos with professional aesthetics make a depicted destination appear more visually appealing, ultimately driving booking intentions. However, the negative effects of amateur aesthetics are mitigated when (1) viewed by risk-averse tourists, (2) presented alongside positive reviews, and (3) accompanied by a greater number of professional photos.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Travel Research
Number of pages16
ISSN0047-2875
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Dec 2019

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online December 30, 2019

Keywords

  • Aesthetics
  • Online photography
  • Social media
  • User-generated content
  • Review sites

Cite this

@article{e6b47606dc48439cbee54d88d9c3bf25,
title = "The Role of Photograph Aesthetics on Online Review Sites: Effects of Management- versus Traveler-generated Photos on Tourists’ Decision Making",
abstract = "Tourists searching for information about destinations on online review sites are concurrently exposed to two different photograph aesthetics, professional (produced by destination managers) and amateur (generated by travelers). While the former is glossy and sharp, the latter is often grainy and overexposed. Although aesthetics are important factors in tourist decision making, the effects of the exposure to both types of photograph aesthetics remain largely unexamined. This research investigates how both types of aesthetics, either singularly or in combination, affect a destination’s visual appeal and tourists’ booking intentions through four controlled experiments (N = 1,282). Our results show that despite the “messy” beauty in amateur aesthetics, photos with professional aesthetics make a depicted destination appear more visually appealing, ultimately driving booking intentions. However, the negative effects of amateur aesthetics are mitigated when (1) viewed by risk-averse tourists, (2) presented alongside positive reviews, and (3) accompanied by a greater number of professional photos.",
keywords = "Aesthetics, Online photography, Social media, User-generated content, Review sites, Aesthetics, Online photography, Social media, User-generated content, Review sites",
author = "Ben Marder and Antonia Erz and Robert Angell and Kirk Plangger",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online December 30, 2019",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1177/0047287519895125",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Travel Research",
issn = "0047-2875",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",

}

The Role of Photograph Aesthetics on Online Review Sites : Effects of Management- versus Traveler-generated Photos on Tourists’ Decision Making. / Marder, Ben; Erz, Antonia; Angell, Robert; Plangger, Kirk.

In: Journal of Travel Research, 30.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Photograph Aesthetics on Online Review Sites

T2 - Effects of Management- versus Traveler-generated Photos on Tourists’ Decision Making

AU - Marder, Ben

AU - Erz, Antonia

AU - Angell, Robert

AU - Plangger, Kirk

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online December 30, 2019

PY - 2019/12/30

Y1 - 2019/12/30

N2 - Tourists searching for information about destinations on online review sites are concurrently exposed to two different photograph aesthetics, professional (produced by destination managers) and amateur (generated by travelers). While the former is glossy and sharp, the latter is often grainy and overexposed. Although aesthetics are important factors in tourist decision making, the effects of the exposure to both types of photograph aesthetics remain largely unexamined. This research investigates how both types of aesthetics, either singularly or in combination, affect a destination’s visual appeal and tourists’ booking intentions through four controlled experiments (N = 1,282). Our results show that despite the “messy” beauty in amateur aesthetics, photos with professional aesthetics make a depicted destination appear more visually appealing, ultimately driving booking intentions. However, the negative effects of amateur aesthetics are mitigated when (1) viewed by risk-averse tourists, (2) presented alongside positive reviews, and (3) accompanied by a greater number of professional photos.

AB - Tourists searching for information about destinations on online review sites are concurrently exposed to two different photograph aesthetics, professional (produced by destination managers) and amateur (generated by travelers). While the former is glossy and sharp, the latter is often grainy and overexposed. Although aesthetics are important factors in tourist decision making, the effects of the exposure to both types of photograph aesthetics remain largely unexamined. This research investigates how both types of aesthetics, either singularly or in combination, affect a destination’s visual appeal and tourists’ booking intentions through four controlled experiments (N = 1,282). Our results show that despite the “messy” beauty in amateur aesthetics, photos with professional aesthetics make a depicted destination appear more visually appealing, ultimately driving booking intentions. However, the negative effects of amateur aesthetics are mitigated when (1) viewed by risk-averse tourists, (2) presented alongside positive reviews, and (3) accompanied by a greater number of professional photos.

KW - Aesthetics

KW - Online photography

KW - Social media

KW - User-generated content

KW - Review sites

KW - Aesthetics

KW - Online photography

KW - Social media

KW - User-generated content

KW - Review sites

U2 - 10.1177/0047287519895125

DO - 10.1177/0047287519895125

M3 - Journal article

JO - Journal of Travel Research

JF - Journal of Travel Research

SN - 0047-2875

ER -