The Role of Different Ownership Structures for Restructuring: Evidence from Baltic and other Transitional Economies

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    Abstract

    In the core of the transition in Eastern Europe is the change of enterprise governance with a change in the distribution of ownership rights on the different stakeholders involved in the enterprises. What has been the role of different types of ownership structures for the success of this restructuring process? Ownership of five different stakeholders is analyzed: state, employees, managers, domestic outsiders and foreign investors. The ownership changes are analyzed over four different stages of the transition process.
    It is shown how employee ownership played an important role in the first stages of transition in some countries. Management ownership has been decisive for the dynamics of SMEs. Domestic outside and foreign ownership have grown with the progress of transition and play an increasing role for restructuring. The role of each ownership type is analyzed both from a theoretical point and with presentation of some of the empirical evidence on performance and restructuring. There is mostly referred to the experience in the Baltic countries, but evidence from Russia, Slovenia and other transitional countries are also included. Both theory and evidence put state ownership on the low and foreign on the high level of performance and restructuring. For the question of insider versus outsider the picture is less clear. The weight of different ownership structures are changing over the different stages, the change follows the governance cycle from state to employee, to manager, to outside/foreign ownership. The speed of change and the weight of different types is to a high degree a political question. The paper ends up with a list of policy recommendations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationFrederiksberg
    PublisherCEES, Copenhagen Business School
    Number of pages26
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2002
    SeriesWorking Paper / Center for East European Studies. Copenhagen Business School
    Number45

    Cite this

    Mygind, N. (2002). The Role of Different Ownership Structures for Restructuring: Evidence from Baltic and other Transitional Economies. Frederiksberg: CEES, Copenhagen Business School. Working Paper / Center for East European Studies. Copenhagen Business School, No. 45
    Mygind, Niels. / The Role of Different Ownership Structures for Restructuring : Evidence from Baltic and other Transitional Economies. Frederiksberg : CEES, Copenhagen Business School, 2002. (Working Paper / Center for East European Studies. Copenhagen Business School; No. 45).
    @techreport{00b743708f6911dba124000ea68e967b,
    title = "The Role of Different Ownership Structures for Restructuring: Evidence from Baltic and other Transitional Economies",
    abstract = "In the core of the transition in Eastern Europe is the change of enterprise governance with a change in the distribution of ownership rights on the different stakeholders involved in the enterprises. What has been the role of different types of ownership structures for the success of this restructuring process? Ownership of five different stakeholders is analyzed: state, employees, managers, domestic outsiders and foreign investors. The ownership changes are analyzed over four different stages of the transition process.It is shown how employee ownership played an important role in the first stages of transition in some countries. Management ownership has been decisive for the dynamics of SMEs. Domestic outside and foreign ownership have grown with the progress of transition and play an increasing role for restructuring. The role of each ownership type is analyzed both from a theoretical point and with presentation of some of the empirical evidence on performance and restructuring. There is mostly referred to the experience in the Baltic countries, but evidence from Russia, Slovenia and other transitional countries are also included. Both theory and evidence put state ownership on the low and foreign on the high level of performance and restructuring. For the question of insider versus outsider the picture is less clear. The weight of different ownership structures are changing over the different stages, the change follows the governance cycle from state to employee, to manager, to outside/foreign ownership. The speed of change and the weight of different types is to a high degree a political question. The paper ends up with a list of policy recommendations.",
    keywords = "Baltiske lande, Virksomhedens reorganisation",
    author = "Niels Mygind",
    year = "2002",
    month = "9",
    language = "English",
    series = "Working Paper / Center for East European Studies. Copenhagen Business School",
    publisher = "CEES, Copenhagen Business School",
    number = "45",
    address = "Denmark",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "CEES, Copenhagen Business School",

    }

    The Role of Different Ownership Structures for Restructuring : Evidence from Baltic and other Transitional Economies. / Mygind, Niels.

    Frederiksberg : CEES, Copenhagen Business School, 2002.

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - The Role of Different Ownership Structures for Restructuring

    T2 - Evidence from Baltic and other Transitional Economies

    AU - Mygind, Niels

    PY - 2002/9

    Y1 - 2002/9

    N2 - In the core of the transition in Eastern Europe is the change of enterprise governance with a change in the distribution of ownership rights on the different stakeholders involved in the enterprises. What has been the role of different types of ownership structures for the success of this restructuring process? Ownership of five different stakeholders is analyzed: state, employees, managers, domestic outsiders and foreign investors. The ownership changes are analyzed over four different stages of the transition process.It is shown how employee ownership played an important role in the first stages of transition in some countries. Management ownership has been decisive for the dynamics of SMEs. Domestic outside and foreign ownership have grown with the progress of transition and play an increasing role for restructuring. The role of each ownership type is analyzed both from a theoretical point and with presentation of some of the empirical evidence on performance and restructuring. There is mostly referred to the experience in the Baltic countries, but evidence from Russia, Slovenia and other transitional countries are also included. Both theory and evidence put state ownership on the low and foreign on the high level of performance and restructuring. For the question of insider versus outsider the picture is less clear. The weight of different ownership structures are changing over the different stages, the change follows the governance cycle from state to employee, to manager, to outside/foreign ownership. The speed of change and the weight of different types is to a high degree a political question. The paper ends up with a list of policy recommendations.

    AB - In the core of the transition in Eastern Europe is the change of enterprise governance with a change in the distribution of ownership rights on the different stakeholders involved in the enterprises. What has been the role of different types of ownership structures for the success of this restructuring process? Ownership of five different stakeholders is analyzed: state, employees, managers, domestic outsiders and foreign investors. The ownership changes are analyzed over four different stages of the transition process.It is shown how employee ownership played an important role in the first stages of transition in some countries. Management ownership has been decisive for the dynamics of SMEs. Domestic outside and foreign ownership have grown with the progress of transition and play an increasing role for restructuring. The role of each ownership type is analyzed both from a theoretical point and with presentation of some of the empirical evidence on performance and restructuring. There is mostly referred to the experience in the Baltic countries, but evidence from Russia, Slovenia and other transitional countries are also included. Both theory and evidence put state ownership on the low and foreign on the high level of performance and restructuring. For the question of insider versus outsider the picture is less clear. The weight of different ownership structures are changing over the different stages, the change follows the governance cycle from state to employee, to manager, to outside/foreign ownership. The speed of change and the weight of different types is to a high degree a political question. The paper ends up with a list of policy recommendations.

    KW - Baltiske lande

    KW - Virksomhedens reorganisation

    M3 - Working paper

    T3 - Working Paper / Center for East European Studies. Copenhagen Business School

    BT - The Role of Different Ownership Structures for Restructuring

    PB - CEES, Copenhagen Business School

    CY - Frederiksberg

    ER -