The Risk Preferences of U.S. Executives

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this paper, I elicit risk attitudes of U.S. executives by calibrating a subjective option valuation model for option exercising data (1996 to 2008), yielding approximately 65,000 values of relative risk aversion (RRA) for almost 7,000 executives. The observed behavior is generally consistent with moderate risk aversion and a median (mean) RRA close to one (three). Values are validated for chief executive officers (CEOs) by testing theory-based predictions on the influence of individual characteristics on risk preferences such as gender, marital status, religiosity, and intelligence. Senior managers such as CEOs, presidents, and chairpersons of the boards of directors are significantly less risk averse than non-senior executives. RRA heterogeneity is strongly correlated with sector membership and firm-level variables such as size, performance, and capital structure. Alternative factors influencing option exercises are tested for their influence on RRA values.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalManagement Science
    Volume61
    Issue number6
    Pages (from-to)1344-1361
    Number of pages18
    ISSN0025-1909
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Keywords

    • CRRA preferences
    • Top executives
    • Calibration method

    Cite this

    Brenner, Steffen. / The Risk Preferences of U.S. Executives. In: Management Science. 2015 ; Vol. 61, No. 6. pp. 1344-1361.
    @article{4f060541d38e4023802bcb95495167cf,
    title = "The Risk Preferences of U.S. Executives",
    abstract = "In this paper, I elicit risk attitudes of U.S. executives by calibrating a subjective option valuation model for option exercising data (1996 to 2008), yielding approximately 65,000 values of relative risk aversion (RRA) for almost 7,000 executives. The observed behavior is generally consistent with moderate risk aversion and a median (mean) RRA close to one (three). Values are validated for chief executive officers (CEOs) by testing theory-based predictions on the influence of individual characteristics on risk preferences such as gender, marital status, religiosity, and intelligence. Senior managers such as CEOs, presidents, and chairpersons of the boards of directors are significantly less risk averse than non-senior executives. RRA heterogeneity is strongly correlated with sector membership and firm-level variables such as size, performance, and capital structure. Alternative factors influencing option exercises are tested for their influence on RRA values.",
    keywords = "CRRA preferences, Top executives, Calibration method, CRRA preferences, Top executives, Calibration method",
    author = "Steffen Brenner",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1287/mnsc.2013.1882",
    language = "English",
    volume = "61",
    pages = "1344--1361",
    journal = "Management Science",
    issn = "0025-1909",
    publisher = "Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences",
    number = "6",

    }

    The Risk Preferences of U.S. Executives. / Brenner, Steffen.

    In: Management Science, Vol. 61, No. 6, 2015, p. 1344-1361.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Risk Preferences of U.S. Executives

    AU - Brenner, Steffen

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - In this paper, I elicit risk attitudes of U.S. executives by calibrating a subjective option valuation model for option exercising data (1996 to 2008), yielding approximately 65,000 values of relative risk aversion (RRA) for almost 7,000 executives. The observed behavior is generally consistent with moderate risk aversion and a median (mean) RRA close to one (three). Values are validated for chief executive officers (CEOs) by testing theory-based predictions on the influence of individual characteristics on risk preferences such as gender, marital status, religiosity, and intelligence. Senior managers such as CEOs, presidents, and chairpersons of the boards of directors are significantly less risk averse than non-senior executives. RRA heterogeneity is strongly correlated with sector membership and firm-level variables such as size, performance, and capital structure. Alternative factors influencing option exercises are tested for their influence on RRA values.

    AB - In this paper, I elicit risk attitudes of U.S. executives by calibrating a subjective option valuation model for option exercising data (1996 to 2008), yielding approximately 65,000 values of relative risk aversion (RRA) for almost 7,000 executives. The observed behavior is generally consistent with moderate risk aversion and a median (mean) RRA close to one (three). Values are validated for chief executive officers (CEOs) by testing theory-based predictions on the influence of individual characteristics on risk preferences such as gender, marital status, religiosity, and intelligence. Senior managers such as CEOs, presidents, and chairpersons of the boards of directors are significantly less risk averse than non-senior executives. RRA heterogeneity is strongly correlated with sector membership and firm-level variables such as size, performance, and capital structure. Alternative factors influencing option exercises are tested for their influence on RRA values.

    KW - CRRA preferences

    KW - Top executives

    KW - Calibration method

    KW - CRRA preferences

    KW - Top executives

    KW - Calibration method

    U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1882

    DO - 10.1287/mnsc.2013.1882

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 61

    SP - 1344

    EP - 1361

    JO - Management Science

    JF - Management Science

    SN - 0025-1909

    IS - 6

    ER -