The Problem of Non-compliance: Knowledge Gaps and Moments of Contestation in Global Governance

Hannes Hansen-Magnusson, Antje Vetterlein, Antje Wiener

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

How do we account for norm (non-)compliance in complex situations of global governance? Instead of emphasising power and diverging interests, this research note develops an innovative framework by arguing for a need to account for the social foundation of norms and the processes of norm contestation among relevant stakeholders. It comprises three crucial elements: first, the relevant stakeholders that form around specific policies; second, the types of knowledge about the policy object at stake; and finally, the knowledge gaps across stakeholders and their strategies to overcome them. Based on these considerations, we advance a framework of three pillars of ‘vested interests’, ‘vice’ and ‘virtue’: given, first, the diversity of stakeholders in policy-making and their vested interests, we assume, secondly, an increased likelihood for norm contestation. For some this constitutes a vice. However, we argue, thirdly, that open deliberation has the potential to lead to positive implications for governance arrangements and is therefore a virtue for norm compliance. Applying this framework to the example of the use of outer space, we show how our approach can address what we call the ‘lasting reality’ of global governance, namely the regular confrontation of culturally embedded normativity that stems from the increased diversity of actors in the global realm.
How do we account for norm (non-)compliance in complex situations of global governance? Instead of emphasising power and diverging interests, this research note develops an innovative framework by arguing for a need to account for the social foundation of norms and the processes of norm contestation among relevant stakeholders. It comprises three crucial elements: first, the relevant stakeholders that form around specific policies; second, the types of knowledge about the policy object at stake; and finally, the knowledge gaps across stakeholders and their strategies to overcome them. Based on these considerations, we advance a framework of three pillars of ‘vested interests’, ‘vice’ and ‘virtue’: given, first, the diversity of stakeholders in policy-making and their vested interests, we assume, secondly, an increased likelihood for norm contestation. For some this constitutes a vice. However, we argue, thirdly, that open deliberation has the potential to lead to positive implications for governance arrangements and is therefore a virtue for norm compliance. Applying this framework to the example of the use of outer space, we show how our approach can address what we call the ‘lasting reality’ of global governance, namely the regular confrontation of culturally embedded normativity that stems from the increased diversity of actors in the global realm.
LanguageEnglish
JournalJournal of International Relations and Development
Number of pages21
ISSN1408-6980
DOIs
StatePublished - 26 Jul 2018

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 26. July 2018

Keywords

  • Global governance
  • Norms
  • Contestation
  • Normativity
  • Legitimacy
  • Knowledge

Cite this

@article{9bf83bd2d090434e854c60a5802dc83a,
title = "The Problem of Non-compliance: Knowledge Gaps and Moments of Contestation in Global Governance",
abstract = "How do we account for norm (non-)compliance in complex situations of global governance? Instead of emphasising power and diverging interests, this research note develops an innovative framework by arguing for a need to account for the social foundation of norms and the processes of norm contestation among relevant stakeholders. It comprises three crucial elements: first, the relevant stakeholders that form around specific policies; second, the types of knowledge about the policy object at stake; and finally, the knowledge gaps across stakeholders and their strategies to overcome them. Based on these considerations, we advance a framework of three pillars of ‘vested interests’, ‘vice’ and ‘virtue’: given, first, the diversity of stakeholders in policy-making and their vested interests, we assume, secondly, an increased likelihood for norm contestation. For some this constitutes a vice. However, we argue, thirdly, that open deliberation has the potential to lead to positive implications for governance arrangements and is therefore a virtue for norm compliance. Applying this framework to the example of the use of outer space, we show how our approach can address what we call the ‘lasting reality’ of global governance, namely the regular confrontation of culturally embedded normativity that stems from the increased diversity of actors in the global realm.",
keywords = "Global governance, Norms, Contestation, Normativity, Legitimacy, Knowledge, Global governance, Norms, Contestation, Normativity, Legitimacy, Knowledge",
author = "Hannes Hansen-Magnusson and Antje Vetterlein and Antje Wiener",
note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 26. July 2018",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1057{\%}2Fs41268-018-0157-x",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of International Relations and Development",
issn = "1408-6980",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",

}

The Problem of Non-compliance : Knowledge Gaps and Moments of Contestation in Global Governance. / Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes; Vetterlein, Antje; Wiener, Antje.

In: Journal of International Relations and Development, 26.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Problem of Non-compliance

T2 - Journal of International Relations and Development

AU - Hansen-Magnusson,Hannes

AU - Vetterlein,Antje

AU - Wiener,Antje

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 26. July 2018

PY - 2018/7/26

Y1 - 2018/7/26

N2 - How do we account for norm (non-)compliance in complex situations of global governance? Instead of emphasising power and diverging interests, this research note develops an innovative framework by arguing for a need to account for the social foundation of norms and the processes of norm contestation among relevant stakeholders. It comprises three crucial elements: first, the relevant stakeholders that form around specific policies; second, the types of knowledge about the policy object at stake; and finally, the knowledge gaps across stakeholders and their strategies to overcome them. Based on these considerations, we advance a framework of three pillars of ‘vested interests’, ‘vice’ and ‘virtue’: given, first, the diversity of stakeholders in policy-making and their vested interests, we assume, secondly, an increased likelihood for norm contestation. For some this constitutes a vice. However, we argue, thirdly, that open deliberation has the potential to lead to positive implications for governance arrangements and is therefore a virtue for norm compliance. Applying this framework to the example of the use of outer space, we show how our approach can address what we call the ‘lasting reality’ of global governance, namely the regular confrontation of culturally embedded normativity that stems from the increased diversity of actors in the global realm.

AB - How do we account for norm (non-)compliance in complex situations of global governance? Instead of emphasising power and diverging interests, this research note develops an innovative framework by arguing for a need to account for the social foundation of norms and the processes of norm contestation among relevant stakeholders. It comprises three crucial elements: first, the relevant stakeholders that form around specific policies; second, the types of knowledge about the policy object at stake; and finally, the knowledge gaps across stakeholders and their strategies to overcome them. Based on these considerations, we advance a framework of three pillars of ‘vested interests’, ‘vice’ and ‘virtue’: given, first, the diversity of stakeholders in policy-making and their vested interests, we assume, secondly, an increased likelihood for norm contestation. For some this constitutes a vice. However, we argue, thirdly, that open deliberation has the potential to lead to positive implications for governance arrangements and is therefore a virtue for norm compliance. Applying this framework to the example of the use of outer space, we show how our approach can address what we call the ‘lasting reality’ of global governance, namely the regular confrontation of culturally embedded normativity that stems from the increased diversity of actors in the global realm.

KW - Global governance

KW - Norms

KW - Contestation

KW - Normativity

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Knowledge

KW - Global governance

KW - Norms

KW - Contestation

KW - Normativity

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Knowledge

U2 - 10.1057%2Fs41268-018-0157-x

DO - 10.1057%2Fs41268-018-0157-x

M3 - Journal article

JO - Journal of International Relations and Development

JF - Journal of International Relations and Development

SN - 1408-6980

ER -