The Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis

Four Centuries of Evidence

David Harvey, Neil M. Kellard, Jakob B. Madsen, Mark E. Wohar

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
JournalReview of Economics and Statistics
Volume92
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)367-377
ISSN0034-6535
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Cite this

Harvey, D., Kellard, N. M., Madsen, J. B., & Wohar, M. E. (2010). The Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis: Four Centuries of Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), 367-377.
Harvey, David ; Kellard, Neil M. ; Madsen, Jakob B. ; Wohar, Mark E. / The Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis : Four Centuries of Evidence. In: Review of Economics and Statistics. 2010 ; Vol. 92, No. 2. pp. 367-377.
@article{3e71da5669a240af8c7071e9a9bd3f7f,
title = "The Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis: Four Centuries of Evidence",
author = "David Harvey and Kellard, {Neil M.} and Madsen, {Jakob B.} and Wohar, {Mark E.}",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "92",
pages = "367--377",
journal = "Review of Economics and Statistics",
issn = "0034-6535",
publisher = "MIT Press",
number = "2",

}

Harvey, D, Kellard, NM, Madsen, JB & Wohar, ME 2010, 'The Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis: Four Centuries of Evidence', Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 367-377.

The Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis : Four Centuries of Evidence. / Harvey, David; Kellard, Neil M.; Madsen, Jakob B.; Wohar, Mark E.

In: Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 92, No. 2, 2010, p. 367-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis

T2 - Four Centuries of Evidence

AU - Harvey, David

AU - Kellard, Neil M.

AU - Madsen, Jakob B.

AU - Wohar, Mark E.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

M3 - Journal article

VL - 92

SP - 367

EP - 377

JO - Review of Economics and Statistics

JF - Review of Economics and Statistics

SN - 0034-6535

IS - 2

ER -

Harvey D, Kellard NM, Madsen JB, Wohar ME. The Prebisch-Singer Hypothesis: Four Centuries of Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2010;92(2):367-377.