The Power of Example

Closure and Common Ground

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper suggests that for negotiation studies, the well-researched role of cognitive closure in decision-making should be supplemented with specific research on what sort of information is seized on as unambiguous, salient and easily processable by negotiators. A study of email negotiation is reported that suggests that negotiators seize on concrete examples as building blocks that produce immediate positive feedback and consequent utilization in establishing common ground.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationGroup Decision and Negotiation : (GND) 2013
    EditorsBilyana Martinovski
    Place of PublicationKista
    PublisherDepartment of Computer and Systems Development (DSV). Stockholm University
    Publication date2013
    Pages269-275
    ISBN (Print)9789163734908
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    Event13th Meeting on Group Decision and Negotiation. 2013 - Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
    Duration: 17 Jun 201321 Jun 2013
    Conference number: 13
    http://gdn2013.blogs.dsv.su.se/

    Conference

    Conference13th Meeting on Group Decision and Negotiation. 2013
    Number13
    LocationStockholm University
    CountrySweden
    CityStockholm
    Period17/06/201321/06/2013
    Internet address

    Cite this

    Bülow, A. M. (2013). The Power of Example: Closure and Common Ground. In B. Martinovski (Ed.), Group Decision and Negotiation: (GND) 2013 (pp. 269-275). Kista: Department of Computer and Systems Development (DSV). Stockholm University .
    Bülow, Anne Marie. / The Power of Example : Closure and Common Ground. Group Decision and Negotiation: (GND) 2013. editor / Bilyana Martinovski. Kista : Department of Computer and Systems Development (DSV). Stockholm University , 2013. pp. 269-275
    @inproceedings{d1cab4931aab49baaf959544120d0699,
    title = "The Power of Example: Closure and Common Ground",
    abstract = "This paper suggests that for negotiation studies, the well-researched role of cognitive closure in decision-making should be supplemented with specific research on what sort of information is seized on as unambiguous, salient and easily processable by negotiators. A study of email negotiation is reported that suggests that negotiators seize on concrete examples as building blocks that produce immediate positive feedback and consequent utilization in establishing common ground.",
    keywords = "Cognitive closure, Email negotiation, Argumentation",
    author = "B{\"u}low, {Anne Marie}",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9789163734908",
    pages = "269--275",
    editor = "Bilyana Martinovski",
    booktitle = "Group Decision and Negotiation",
    publisher = "Department of Computer and Systems Development (DSV). Stockholm University",
    address = "Sweden",

    }

    Bülow, AM 2013, The Power of Example: Closure and Common Ground. in B Martinovski (ed.), Group Decision and Negotiation: (GND) 2013. Department of Computer and Systems Development (DSV). Stockholm University , Kista, pp. 269-275, Stockholm, Sweden, 17/06/2013.

    The Power of Example : Closure and Common Ground. / Bülow, Anne Marie.

    Group Decision and Negotiation: (GND) 2013. ed. / Bilyana Martinovski. Kista : Department of Computer and Systems Development (DSV). Stockholm University , 2013. p. 269-275.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - The Power of Example

    T2 - Closure and Common Ground

    AU - Bülow, Anne Marie

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - This paper suggests that for negotiation studies, the well-researched role of cognitive closure in decision-making should be supplemented with specific research on what sort of information is seized on as unambiguous, salient and easily processable by negotiators. A study of email negotiation is reported that suggests that negotiators seize on concrete examples as building blocks that produce immediate positive feedback and consequent utilization in establishing common ground.

    AB - This paper suggests that for negotiation studies, the well-researched role of cognitive closure in decision-making should be supplemented with specific research on what sort of information is seized on as unambiguous, salient and easily processable by negotiators. A study of email negotiation is reported that suggests that negotiators seize on concrete examples as building blocks that produce immediate positive feedback and consequent utilization in establishing common ground.

    KW - Cognitive closure

    KW - Email negotiation

    KW - Argumentation

    M3 - Article in proceedings

    SN - 9789163734908

    SP - 269

    EP - 275

    BT - Group Decision and Negotiation

    A2 - Martinovski, Bilyana

    PB - Department of Computer and Systems Development (DSV). Stockholm University

    CY - Kista

    ER -

    Bülow AM. The Power of Example: Closure and Common Ground. In Martinovski B, editor, Group Decision and Negotiation: (GND) 2013. Kista: Department of Computer and Systems Development (DSV). Stockholm University . 2013. p. 269-275