The Performance of Intellectual Capital: Mobilising Relationships Between Intellectual and Financial Capital in a Bank

Vijaya Murthy, Jan Mouritsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to analyse the relationship between intellectual capital and financial capital using a case study. This makes it possible to discuss how intellectual capital is related to value creation with a degree of nuance that is absent from most statistical studies of relationships between human, organisational, relational and financial capital.

Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a case study of a firm that invests in intellectual capital in order to develop financial capital. It traces the relationship between intellectual capital elements and financial capital via interviews. This allows the development of a nuanced account of the performance of intellectual capital. This account questions the universality of the linear model typically found in statistical studies. The model makes it possible to show how items of intellectual capital not only interact but also compete.

Findings – Relationships between intellectual capital and financial capital are challenging to specify because they are complementary rather than causal. Financial capital is not only an effect but also an important input because the development of intellectual capital takes place through the firm's budgeting processes.

Research limitations/implications – The findings suggest future development of accounts of the role and performance (strength) of intellectual capital be developed around imaginative, perhaps recursive and certainly dynamic, statistical models and/or more inclusive case studies of the various elements that influence the development and transformation of intellectual capital.

Originality/value – The case study suggests that investments in intellectual capital happen in the context of many other investments. Bounded by the budgeting process, intellectual capital has no separate agenda and therefore, intellectual capital investments compete with other types of investments.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Volume24
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)622-646
ISSN0951-3574
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Intellectual Capital
  • Budgetary Control
  • Performance Management
  • Management Control

Cite this

@article{ae57bc6bad9c4b1fb0678fe04ed52e6d,
title = "The Performance of Intellectual Capital: Mobilising Relationships Between Intellectual and Financial Capital in a Bank",
abstract = "Purpose – This paper aims to analyse the relationship between intellectual capital and financial capital using a case study. This makes it possible to discuss how intellectual capital is related to value creation with a degree of nuance that is absent from most statistical studies of relationships between human, organisational, relational and financial capital.Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a case study of a firm that invests in intellectual capital in order to develop financial capital. It traces the relationship between intellectual capital elements and financial capital via interviews. This allows the development of a nuanced account of the performance of intellectual capital. This account questions the universality of the linear model typically found in statistical studies. The model makes it possible to show how items of intellectual capital not only interact but also compete.Findings – Relationships between intellectual capital and financial capital are challenging to specify because they are complementary rather than causal. Financial capital is not only an effect but also an important input because the development of intellectual capital takes place through the firm's budgeting processes.Research limitations/implications – The findings suggest future development of accounts of the role and performance (strength) of intellectual capital be developed around imaginative, perhaps recursive and certainly dynamic, statistical models and/or more inclusive case studies of the various elements that influence the development and transformation of intellectual capital.Originality/value – The case study suggests that investments in intellectual capital happen in the context of many other investments. Bounded by the budgeting process, intellectual capital has no separate agenda and therefore, intellectual capital investments compete with other types of investments.",
keywords = "Intellectual Capital, Budgetary Control, Performance Management, Management Control",
author = "Vijaya Murthy and Jan Mouritsen",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1108/09513571111139120",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "622--646",
journal = "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal",
issn = "1368-0668",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "5",

}

The Performance of Intellectual Capital : Mobilising Relationships Between Intellectual and Financial Capital in a Bank. / Murthy, Vijaya; Mouritsen, Jan.

In: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2011, p. 622-646.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Performance of Intellectual Capital

T2 - Mobilising Relationships Between Intellectual and Financial Capital in a Bank

AU - Murthy, Vijaya

AU - Mouritsen, Jan

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose – This paper aims to analyse the relationship between intellectual capital and financial capital using a case study. This makes it possible to discuss how intellectual capital is related to value creation with a degree of nuance that is absent from most statistical studies of relationships between human, organisational, relational and financial capital.Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a case study of a firm that invests in intellectual capital in order to develop financial capital. It traces the relationship between intellectual capital elements and financial capital via interviews. This allows the development of a nuanced account of the performance of intellectual capital. This account questions the universality of the linear model typically found in statistical studies. The model makes it possible to show how items of intellectual capital not only interact but also compete.Findings – Relationships between intellectual capital and financial capital are challenging to specify because they are complementary rather than causal. Financial capital is not only an effect but also an important input because the development of intellectual capital takes place through the firm's budgeting processes.Research limitations/implications – The findings suggest future development of accounts of the role and performance (strength) of intellectual capital be developed around imaginative, perhaps recursive and certainly dynamic, statistical models and/or more inclusive case studies of the various elements that influence the development and transformation of intellectual capital.Originality/value – The case study suggests that investments in intellectual capital happen in the context of many other investments. Bounded by the budgeting process, intellectual capital has no separate agenda and therefore, intellectual capital investments compete with other types of investments.

AB - Purpose – This paper aims to analyse the relationship between intellectual capital and financial capital using a case study. This makes it possible to discuss how intellectual capital is related to value creation with a degree of nuance that is absent from most statistical studies of relationships between human, organisational, relational and financial capital.Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a case study of a firm that invests in intellectual capital in order to develop financial capital. It traces the relationship between intellectual capital elements and financial capital via interviews. This allows the development of a nuanced account of the performance of intellectual capital. This account questions the universality of the linear model typically found in statistical studies. The model makes it possible to show how items of intellectual capital not only interact but also compete.Findings – Relationships between intellectual capital and financial capital are challenging to specify because they are complementary rather than causal. Financial capital is not only an effect but also an important input because the development of intellectual capital takes place through the firm's budgeting processes.Research limitations/implications – The findings suggest future development of accounts of the role and performance (strength) of intellectual capital be developed around imaginative, perhaps recursive and certainly dynamic, statistical models and/or more inclusive case studies of the various elements that influence the development and transformation of intellectual capital.Originality/value – The case study suggests that investments in intellectual capital happen in the context of many other investments. Bounded by the budgeting process, intellectual capital has no separate agenda and therefore, intellectual capital investments compete with other types of investments.

KW - Intellectual Capital

KW - Budgetary Control

KW - Performance Management

KW - Management Control

U2 - 10.1108/09513571111139120

DO - 10.1108/09513571111139120

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 622

EP - 646

JO - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

JF - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

SN - 1368-0668

IS - 5

ER -