The Passing-on Defence Catapulted Out of State Aid Law: Annotation on the Judgments of the Court of Justice the European Union (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016 in Joined Cases C-164/15 P Commission v Aer Lingus and C-165/15 P Commission v Ryanair

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The annotated judgment concerns the aftermath of a differentiated taxation on travelling. The General Court partially annulled the Commission’s decision and found that the recovery of the aid should be limited to the advantage actually retained by the airlines, taking into account the competitive situation as well as the possibility that the advantage could have been passed on to the passengers through lower ticket prices. The Commission appealed this judgment and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) found for the Commission; thus, the nominal amount of aid should be recovered. The judgment thereby upholds the status quo reasonably taking into account all indirect effects of State aid.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean State Aid Law Quarterly
Volume16
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)93-98
ISSN1619-5272
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Recovery of Aid
  • Compensation
  • Indirect Effects

Cite this

@article{5c7dac5683d544d4bc5128b8dc948a78,
title = "The Passing-on Defence Catapulted Out of State Aid Law: Annotation on the Judgments of the Court of Justice the European Union (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016 in Joined Cases C-164/15 P Commission v Aer Lingus and C-165/15 P Commission v Ryanair",
abstract = "The annotated judgment concerns the aftermath of a differentiated taxation on travelling. The General Court partially annulled the Commission’s decision and found that the recovery of the aid should be limited to the advantage actually retained by the airlines, taking into account the competitive situation as well as the possibility that the advantage could have been passed on to the passengers through lower ticket prices. The Commission appealed this judgment and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) found for the Commission; thus, the nominal amount of aid should be recovered. The judgment thereby upholds the status quo reasonably taking into account all indirect effects of State aid.",
keywords = "Recovery of Aid, Compensation, Indirect Effects, Recovery of Aid, Compensation, Indirect Effects",
author = "{\O}lykke, {Grith Skovgaard}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.21552/estal/2017/1/14",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "93--98",
journal = "European State Aid Law Quarterly",
issn = "1619-5272",
publisher = "Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Passing-on Defence Catapulted Out of State Aid Law

T2 - Annotation on the Judgments of the Court of Justice the European Union (Third Chamber) of 21 December 2016 in Joined Cases C-164/15 P Commission v Aer Lingus and C-165/15 P Commission v Ryanair

AU - Ølykke, Grith Skovgaard

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The annotated judgment concerns the aftermath of a differentiated taxation on travelling. The General Court partially annulled the Commission’s decision and found that the recovery of the aid should be limited to the advantage actually retained by the airlines, taking into account the competitive situation as well as the possibility that the advantage could have been passed on to the passengers through lower ticket prices. The Commission appealed this judgment and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) found for the Commission; thus, the nominal amount of aid should be recovered. The judgment thereby upholds the status quo reasonably taking into account all indirect effects of State aid.

AB - The annotated judgment concerns the aftermath of a differentiated taxation on travelling. The General Court partially annulled the Commission’s decision and found that the recovery of the aid should be limited to the advantage actually retained by the airlines, taking into account the competitive situation as well as the possibility that the advantage could have been passed on to the passengers through lower ticket prices. The Commission appealed this judgment and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) found for the Commission; thus, the nominal amount of aid should be recovered. The judgment thereby upholds the status quo reasonably taking into account all indirect effects of State aid.

KW - Recovery of Aid

KW - Compensation

KW - Indirect Effects

KW - Recovery of Aid

KW - Compensation

KW - Indirect Effects

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000210690

U2 - 10.21552/estal/2017/1/14

DO - 10.21552/estal/2017/1/14

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 93

EP - 98

JO - European State Aid Law Quarterly

JF - European State Aid Law Quarterly

SN - 1619-5272

IS - 1

ER -