The Paradox of Openness

Appropriability, External Search and Collaboration

Keld Laursen, Ammon Salter

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    To innovate, firms often need to draw from, and collaborate with, a large number of actors from outside their organization. At the same time, firms need also to be focused on capturing the returns from their innovative ideas. This gives rise to a paradox of openness—the creation of innovations often requires openness, but the commercialization of innovations requires protection. Based on econometric analysis of data from a UK innovation survey, we find a concave relationship between firms’ breadth of external search and formal collaboration for innovation, and the strength of the firms’ appropriability strategies. We show that this concave relationship is stronger for breadth of formal collaboration than for external search. There is also partial evidence suggesting that the relationship is less pronounced for both external search and formal collaboration if firms do not draw ideas from or collaborate with competitors. We explore the implications of these findings for the literature on open innovation and innovation strategy.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalResearch Policy
    Volume43
    Issue number5
    Pages (from-to)867-878
    ISSN0048-7333
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Cite this

    @article{cad0c51d7e45427887b51eaba745973a,
    title = "The Paradox of Openness: Appropriability, External Search and Collaboration",
    abstract = "To innovate, firms often need to draw from, and collaborate with, a large number of actors from outside their organization. At the same time, firms need also to be focused on capturing the returns from their innovative ideas. This gives rise to a paradox of openness—the creation of innovations often requires openness, but the commercialization of innovations requires protection. Based on econometric analysis of data from a UK innovation survey, we find a concave relationship between firms’ breadth of external search and formal collaboration for innovation, and the strength of the firms’ appropriability strategies. We show that this concave relationship is stronger for breadth of formal collaboration than for external search. There is also partial evidence suggesting that the relationship is less pronounced for both external search and formal collaboration if firms do not draw ideas from or collaborate with competitors. We explore the implications of these findings for the literature on open innovation and innovation strategy.",
    keywords = "Appropriability strategy, Innovation, Breadth of openness, Innovation collaboration, Competitor collaboration",
    author = "Keld Laursen and Ammon Salter",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "867--878",
    journal = "Research Policy",
    issn = "0048-7333",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "5",

    }

    The Paradox of Openness : Appropriability, External Search and Collaboration. / Laursen, Keld; Salter, Ammon.

    In: Research Policy, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2014, p. 867-878.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Paradox of Openness

    T2 - Appropriability, External Search and Collaboration

    AU - Laursen, Keld

    AU - Salter, Ammon

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - To innovate, firms often need to draw from, and collaborate with, a large number of actors from outside their organization. At the same time, firms need also to be focused on capturing the returns from their innovative ideas. This gives rise to a paradox of openness—the creation of innovations often requires openness, but the commercialization of innovations requires protection. Based on econometric analysis of data from a UK innovation survey, we find a concave relationship between firms’ breadth of external search and formal collaboration for innovation, and the strength of the firms’ appropriability strategies. We show that this concave relationship is stronger for breadth of formal collaboration than for external search. There is also partial evidence suggesting that the relationship is less pronounced for both external search and formal collaboration if firms do not draw ideas from or collaborate with competitors. We explore the implications of these findings for the literature on open innovation and innovation strategy.

    AB - To innovate, firms often need to draw from, and collaborate with, a large number of actors from outside their organization. At the same time, firms need also to be focused on capturing the returns from their innovative ideas. This gives rise to a paradox of openness—the creation of innovations often requires openness, but the commercialization of innovations requires protection. Based on econometric analysis of data from a UK innovation survey, we find a concave relationship between firms’ breadth of external search and formal collaboration for innovation, and the strength of the firms’ appropriability strategies. We show that this concave relationship is stronger for breadth of formal collaboration than for external search. There is also partial evidence suggesting that the relationship is less pronounced for both external search and formal collaboration if firms do not draw ideas from or collaborate with competitors. We explore the implications of these findings for the literature on open innovation and innovation strategy.

    KW - Appropriability strategy

    KW - Innovation

    KW - Breadth of openness

    KW - Innovation collaboration

    KW - Competitor collaboration

    U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 43

    SP - 867

    EP - 878

    JO - Research Policy

    JF - Research Policy

    SN - 0048-7333

    IS - 5

    ER -