The Orchestra as a Laboratory: Generative Organizing for Performance and Learning

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Orchestras and other performing arts organizations exist to deliver superior performance of artistic and cultural works. While performing arts organizations often serve as analytical templates to understand collective learning, creativity, and innovation, performance is not always concerted with learning in these and other organizations. Zooming in on a critical case of a performance arts’ organization–an orchestra-cum-laboratory–our study seeks to advance understanding of generative forms of organizing for individual and organizational learning and creativity. Unlike traditional orchestras for which performance is an end and rehearsing a means, for the orchestra-cum-laboratory rehearsing is an end in itself, satisfying musicians’ drives to learn and create. We are interested to advance understanding of why and how a creative collective operates as a learning-driven performance arts organization, and to what consequences. A strategy of in-betweenness, namely organizing in between an orchestra and a laboratory, is adopted to find balance between learning and performing. Yet, in-betweenness is not without its tensions. Our study demonstrates how orchestra members’ growth needs lead them to organize as a laboratory, and subsequently how this implies “in-betweenness” both as a strategic choice and as a number of tensions/unintended consequences. We conclude with implications for entrepreneurial, creative, and generative organizations.
Orchestras and other performing arts organizations exist to deliver superior performance of artistic and cultural works. While performing arts organizations often serve as analytical templates to understand collective learning, creativity, and innovation, performance is not always concerted with learning in these and other organizations. Zooming in on a critical case of a performance arts’ organization–an orchestra-cum-laboratory–our study seeks to advance understanding of generative forms of organizing for individual and organizational learning and creativity. Unlike traditional orchestras for which performance is an end and rehearsing a means, for the orchestra-cum-laboratory rehearsing is an end in itself, satisfying musicians’ drives to learn and create. We are interested to advance understanding of why and how a creative collective operates as a learning-driven performance arts organization, and to what consequences. A strategy of in-betweenness, namely organizing in between an orchestra and a laboratory, is adopted to find balance between learning and performing. Yet, in-betweenness is not without its tensions. Our study demonstrates how orchestra members’ growth needs lead them to organize as a laboratory, and subsequently how this implies “in-betweenness” both as a strategic choice and as a number of tensions/unintended consequences. We conclude with implications for entrepreneurial, creative, and generative organizations.

Conference

Conference77th Annual meeting of the Academy of Management
Number77
LocationGeorgia
CountryUnited States
CityAtlanta
Period04/08/201708/08/2017
Internet address

Keywords

  • Learning
  • Performance
  • Performing arts

Cite this

Paunova, M., & Velikova, S. S. (2017). The Orchestra as a Laboratory: Generative Organizing for Performance and Learning. Paper presented at 77th Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, United States.DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10723abstract
Paunova, Minna ; Velikova, Silviya Svejenova. / The Orchestra as a Laboratory : Generative Organizing for Performance and Learning. Paper presented at 77th Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, United States.
@conference{fa7945cf9b164b9aba38af5ef5ca825f,
title = "The Orchestra as a Laboratory: Generative Organizing for Performance and Learning",
abstract = "Orchestras and other performing arts organizations exist to deliver superior performance of artistic and cultural works. While performing arts organizations often serve as analytical templates to understand collective learning, creativity, and innovation, performance is not always concerted with learning in these and other organizations. Zooming in on a critical case of a performance arts’ organization–an orchestra-cum-laboratory–our study seeks to advance understanding of generative forms of organizing for individual and organizational learning and creativity. Unlike traditional orchestras for which performance is an end and rehearsing a means, for the orchestra-cum-laboratory rehearsing is an end in itself, satisfying musicians’ drives to learn and create. We are interested to advance understanding of why and how a creative collective operates as a learning-driven performance arts organization, and to what consequences. A strategy of in-betweenness, namely organizing in between an orchestra and a laboratory, is adopted to find balance between learning and performing. Yet, in-betweenness is not without its tensions. Our study demonstrates how orchestra members’ growth needs lead them to organize as a laboratory, and subsequently how this implies “in-betweenness” both as a strategic choice and as a number of tensions/unintended consequences. We conclude with implications for entrepreneurial, creative, and generative organizations.",
keywords = "Learning, Performance, Performing arts, Learning, Performance, Performing arts",
author = "Minna Paunova and Velikova, {Silviya Svejenova}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10723abstract",
language = "English",
note = "77th Annual meeting of the Academy of Management : At the Interface ; Conference date: 04-08-2017 Through 08-08-2017",
url = "http://aom.org/annualmeeting/, http://aom.org/annualmeeting/",

}

Paunova, M & Velikova, SS 2017, 'The Orchestra as a Laboratory: Generative Organizing for Performance and Learning' Paper presented at 77th Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, United States, 04/08/2017 - 08/08/2017, . DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10723abstract

The Orchestra as a Laboratory : Generative Organizing for Performance and Learning. / Paunova, Minna ; Velikova, Silviya Svejenova.

2017. Paper presented at 77th Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - The Orchestra as a Laboratory

T2 - Generative Organizing for Performance and Learning

AU - Paunova,Minna

AU - Velikova,Silviya Svejenova

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Orchestras and other performing arts organizations exist to deliver superior performance of artistic and cultural works. While performing arts organizations often serve as analytical templates to understand collective learning, creativity, and innovation, performance is not always concerted with learning in these and other organizations. Zooming in on a critical case of a performance arts’ organization–an orchestra-cum-laboratory–our study seeks to advance understanding of generative forms of organizing for individual and organizational learning and creativity. Unlike traditional orchestras for which performance is an end and rehearsing a means, for the orchestra-cum-laboratory rehearsing is an end in itself, satisfying musicians’ drives to learn and create. We are interested to advance understanding of why and how a creative collective operates as a learning-driven performance arts organization, and to what consequences. A strategy of in-betweenness, namely organizing in between an orchestra and a laboratory, is adopted to find balance between learning and performing. Yet, in-betweenness is not without its tensions. Our study demonstrates how orchestra members’ growth needs lead them to organize as a laboratory, and subsequently how this implies “in-betweenness” both as a strategic choice and as a number of tensions/unintended consequences. We conclude with implications for entrepreneurial, creative, and generative organizations.

AB - Orchestras and other performing arts organizations exist to deliver superior performance of artistic and cultural works. While performing arts organizations often serve as analytical templates to understand collective learning, creativity, and innovation, performance is not always concerted with learning in these and other organizations. Zooming in on a critical case of a performance arts’ organization–an orchestra-cum-laboratory–our study seeks to advance understanding of generative forms of organizing for individual and organizational learning and creativity. Unlike traditional orchestras for which performance is an end and rehearsing a means, for the orchestra-cum-laboratory rehearsing is an end in itself, satisfying musicians’ drives to learn and create. We are interested to advance understanding of why and how a creative collective operates as a learning-driven performance arts organization, and to what consequences. A strategy of in-betweenness, namely organizing in between an orchestra and a laboratory, is adopted to find balance between learning and performing. Yet, in-betweenness is not without its tensions. Our study demonstrates how orchestra members’ growth needs lead them to organize as a laboratory, and subsequently how this implies “in-betweenness” both as a strategic choice and as a number of tensions/unintended consequences. We conclude with implications for entrepreneurial, creative, and generative organizations.

KW - Learning

KW - Performance

KW - Performing arts

KW - Learning

KW - Performance

KW - Performing arts

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10723abstract

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10723abstract

M3 - Paper

ER -

Paunova M, Velikova SS. The Orchestra as a Laboratory: Generative Organizing for Performance and Learning. 2017. Paper presented at 77th Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, United States. Available from, DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2017.10723abstract