The Oath, Acclamation, and the Charisma of Office

Mitchell Dean

The Oath, Acclamation, and the Charisma of Office

Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to conference › Conference abstract for conference › Research › peer-review

Abstract

This talk starts with two examples of apparently non-modern rituals that are preserved within the modern and liberal-democratic conceptions of Office: that of the oath and the acclamation. Examples of the former concern the recent debates about the moral calling of teachers in the UK, and the moral character of Edward Snowden. Examples of both are found in the inaugural ceremonies of the President of the United States. On an elementary reading of Max Weber, however, charisma is opposed to bureaucracy as ideal types. The first is an “extra-ordinary” gift of grace, irrational and foreign to all rules, while the second is mundane, rational and rule governed. Nevertheless, what might be more germane to our problem are his indications on the transformation of the charismatic mission into bureaucratic authority, common to antiquity and to the modern Western world. Here he describes the “charisma of office” with its strict distinction between office and its incumbent. Is it possible, we might then ask, that the oath and acclamation have more than a merely “symbolic” function in respect to contemporary forms of public Office?

Original language	English
Publication date	2014
Number of pages	1
Publication status	Published - 2014
Event	The Second Workshop on the Analysis of Bureaucracy in Society: Perspectives on Bureaucracy in Society - Oslo, Norway Duration: 1 Dec 2014 → 2 Dec 2014 Conference number: 2

Workshop

Workshop	The Second Workshop on the Analysis of Bureaucracy in Society
Number	2
Country	Norway
City	Oslo
Period	01/12/2014 → 02/12/2014

Cite this

Dean, M. (2014). The Oath, Acclamation, and the Charisma of Office. Abstract from The Second Workshop on the Analysis of Bureaucracy in Society, Oslo, Norway.

Dean, Mitchell. / The Oath, Acclamation, and the Charisma of Office. Abstract from The Second Workshop on the Analysis of Bureaucracy in Society, Oslo, Norway.1 p.

@conference{9dfd01c2593f41e596e58bf548f86e34,

title = "The Oath, Acclamation, and the Charisma of Office",

abstract = "This talk starts with two examples of apparently non-modern rituals that are preserved within the modern and liberal-democratic conceptions of Office: that of the oath and the acclamation. Examples of the former concern the recent debates about the moral calling of teachers in the UK, and the moral character of Edward Snowden. Examples of both are found in the inaugural ceremonies of the President of the United States. On an elementary reading of Max Weber, however, charisma is opposed to bureaucracy as ideal types. The first is an “extra-ordinary” gift of grace, irrational and foreign to all rules, while the second is mundane, rational and rule governed. Nevertheless, what might be more germane to our problem are his indications on the transformation of the charismatic mission into bureaucratic authority, common to antiquity and to the modern Western world. Here he describes the “charisma of office” with its strict distinction between office and its incumbent. Is it possible, we might then ask, that the oath and acclamation have more than a merely “symbolic” function in respect to contemporary forms of public Office?",

author = "Mitchell Dean",

year = "2014",

language = "English",

note = "null ; Conference date: 01-12-2014 Through 02-12-2014",

}

Dean, M 2014, 'The Oath, Acclamation, and the Charisma of Office', Oslo, Norway, 01/12/2014 - 02/12/2014, .

The Oath, Acclamation, and the Charisma of Office. / Dean, Mitchell.

2014. Abstract from The Second Workshop on the Analysis of Bureaucracy in Society, Oslo, Norway.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Conference abstract for conference › Research › peer-review

TY - ABST

T1 - The Oath, Acclamation, and the Charisma of Office

AU - Dean, Mitchell

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This talk starts with two examples of apparently non-modern rituals that are preserved within the modern and liberal-democratic conceptions of Office: that of the oath and the acclamation. Examples of the former concern the recent debates about the moral calling of teachers in the UK, and the moral character of Edward Snowden. Examples of both are found in the inaugural ceremonies of the President of the United States. On an elementary reading of Max Weber, however, charisma is opposed to bureaucracy as ideal types. The first is an “extra-ordinary” gift of grace, irrational and foreign to all rules, while the second is mundane, rational and rule governed. Nevertheless, what might be more germane to our problem are his indications on the transformation of the charismatic mission into bureaucratic authority, common to antiquity and to the modern Western world. Here he describes the “charisma of office” with its strict distinction between office and its incumbent. Is it possible, we might then ask, that the oath and acclamation have more than a merely “symbolic” function in respect to contemporary forms of public Office?

AB - This talk starts with two examples of apparently non-modern rituals that are preserved within the modern and liberal-democratic conceptions of Office: that of the oath and the acclamation. Examples of the former concern the recent debates about the moral calling of teachers in the UK, and the moral character of Edward Snowden. Examples of both are found in the inaugural ceremonies of the President of the United States. On an elementary reading of Max Weber, however, charisma is opposed to bureaucracy as ideal types. The first is an “extra-ordinary” gift of grace, irrational and foreign to all rules, while the second is mundane, rational and rule governed. Nevertheless, what might be more germane to our problem are his indications on the transformation of the charismatic mission into bureaucratic authority, common to antiquity and to the modern Western world. Here he describes the “charisma of office” with its strict distinction between office and its incumbent. Is it possible, we might then ask, that the oath and acclamation have more than a merely “symbolic” function in respect to contemporary forms of public Office?

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

ER -

Dean M. The Oath, Acclamation, and the Charisma of Office. 2014. Abstract from The Second Workshop on the Analysis of Bureaucracy in Society, Oslo, Norway.