The Nature of Strategic Communication: A Rejoinder to Nothhaft

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recognizing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.

In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recognizing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.

LanguageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Strategic Communication
Volume11
Issue number3
Pages180-183
Number of pages4
ISSN1553-118X
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Cite this

@article{d96ef006f0a14ddc95856fe0bda235d5,
title = "The Nature of Strategic Communication: A Rejoinder to Nothhaft",
abstract = "In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recognizing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.",
author = "Christensen, {Lars Th{\o}ger} and Emma Svensson",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "180--183",
journal = "International Journal of Strategic Communication",
issn = "1553-118X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

The Nature of Strategic Communication : A Rejoinder to Nothhaft. / Christensen, Lars Thøger; Svensson, Emma .

In: International Journal of Strategic Communication, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2017, p. 180-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Nature of Strategic Communication

T2 - International Journal of Strategic Communication

AU - Christensen,Lars Thøger

AU - Svensson,Emma

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recognizing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.

AB - In this article, we address and challenge Nothhaft’s (2016) recent attempt to revive the field of strategic communication through an application of approaches and principles from the studies of the human mind. Instead of an indiscriminate import of a natural science perspective, we argue that the shortcomings of the field are dealt with more adequately by recognizing and embracing the immense complexity at play in all dimensions of strategic communication. The challenge is to understand the multiple goals and dimensions of the field, to acknowledge the principle of recursivity in all communicative practices, and to approach the individual not as a solitary mind, but a social being whose drives and proclivities are always socially and culturally mediated.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000281055

U2 - 10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883

DO - 10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 11

SP - 180

EP - 183

JO - International Journal of Strategic Communication

JF - International Journal of Strategic Communication

SN - 1553-118X

IS - 3

ER -