The Introduction of Serfdom and Labour Markets

Peter Sandholt Jensen, Cristina Victoria Radu, Battista Severgnini, Paul Sharp

Research output: Working paperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We provide evidence of how restrictions on labor mobility, such as serfdom and other types of labor coercion, impact labor market outcomes. To do so, we estimate the impact of a large negative shock to labor mobility in the form of the reintroduction of serfdom in Denmark in 1733, which was targeted at limiting the mobility of farmhands. Using a unique data source based on the archives of estates from the eighteenth century, we test whether serfdom affected the wages of farmhands more strongly than other groups in the labor market, and results based on a differences-in-differences approach reveal evidence consistent with a strong negative effect following its introduction. We also investigate whether one mechanism was that boys with rural backgrounds were prevented from taking up apprenticeships in towns, and find suggestive evidence that this was indeed the case. Thus, our results suggest that serfdom was effectively reducing mobility.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherEuropean Historical Economics Society
Number of pages52
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018
SeriesEHES Working Paper
Number140

Keywords

  • Serfdom
  • Labor mobility
  • Coercion

Cite this

Sandholt Jensen, P., Radu, C. V., Severgnini, B., & Sharp, P. (2018). The Introduction of Serfdom and Labour Markets. London: European Historical Economics Society. EHES Working Paper, No. 140
Sandholt Jensen, Peter ; Radu, Cristina Victoria ; Severgnini, Battista ; Sharp, Paul. / The Introduction of Serfdom and Labour Markets. London : European Historical Economics Society, 2018. (EHES Working Paper; No. 140).
@techreport{c64068c51a994bbb9debecc49357d7c7,
title = "The Introduction of Serfdom and Labour Markets",
abstract = "We provide evidence of how restrictions on labor mobility, such as serfdom and other types of labor coercion, impact labor market outcomes. To do so, we estimate the impact of a large negative shock to labor mobility in the form of the reintroduction of serfdom in Denmark in 1733, which was targeted at limiting the mobility of farmhands. Using a unique data source based on the archives of estates from the eighteenth century, we test whether serfdom affected the wages of farmhands more strongly than other groups in the labor market, and results based on a differences-in-differences approach reveal evidence consistent with a strong negative effect following its introduction. We also investigate whether one mechanism was that boys with rural backgrounds were prevented from taking up apprenticeships in towns, and find suggestive evidence that this was indeed the case. Thus, our results suggest that serfdom was effectively reducing mobility.",
keywords = "Serfdom, Labor mobility, Coercion, Serfdom, Labor mobility, Coercion",
author = "{Sandholt Jensen}, Peter and Radu, {Cristina Victoria} and Battista Severgnini and Paul Sharp",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
language = "English",
publisher = "European Historical Economics Society",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "European Historical Economics Society",

}

Sandholt Jensen, P, Radu, CV, Severgnini, B & Sharp, P 2018 'The Introduction of Serfdom and Labour Markets' European Historical Economics Society, London.

The Introduction of Serfdom and Labour Markets. / Sandholt Jensen, Peter; Radu, Cristina Victoria; Severgnini, Battista; Sharp, Paul.

London : European Historical Economics Society, 2018.

Research output: Working paperResearchpeer-review

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Introduction of Serfdom and Labour Markets

AU - Sandholt Jensen, Peter

AU - Radu, Cristina Victoria

AU - Severgnini, Battista

AU - Sharp, Paul

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - We provide evidence of how restrictions on labor mobility, such as serfdom and other types of labor coercion, impact labor market outcomes. To do so, we estimate the impact of a large negative shock to labor mobility in the form of the reintroduction of serfdom in Denmark in 1733, which was targeted at limiting the mobility of farmhands. Using a unique data source based on the archives of estates from the eighteenth century, we test whether serfdom affected the wages of farmhands more strongly than other groups in the labor market, and results based on a differences-in-differences approach reveal evidence consistent with a strong negative effect following its introduction. We also investigate whether one mechanism was that boys with rural backgrounds were prevented from taking up apprenticeships in towns, and find suggestive evidence that this was indeed the case. Thus, our results suggest that serfdom was effectively reducing mobility.

AB - We provide evidence of how restrictions on labor mobility, such as serfdom and other types of labor coercion, impact labor market outcomes. To do so, we estimate the impact of a large negative shock to labor mobility in the form of the reintroduction of serfdom in Denmark in 1733, which was targeted at limiting the mobility of farmhands. Using a unique data source based on the archives of estates from the eighteenth century, we test whether serfdom affected the wages of farmhands more strongly than other groups in the labor market, and results based on a differences-in-differences approach reveal evidence consistent with a strong negative effect following its introduction. We also investigate whether one mechanism was that boys with rural backgrounds were prevented from taking up apprenticeships in towns, and find suggestive evidence that this was indeed the case. Thus, our results suggest that serfdom was effectively reducing mobility.

KW - Serfdom

KW - Labor mobility

KW - Coercion

KW - Serfdom

KW - Labor mobility

KW - Coercion

M3 - Working paper

BT - The Introduction of Serfdom and Labour Markets

PB - European Historical Economics Society

CY - London

ER -

Sandholt Jensen P, Radu CV, Severgnini B, Sharp P. The Introduction of Serfdom and Labour Markets. London: European Historical Economics Society. 2018 Nov.