The Impact of Sold-out Early Birds on Option Selection in Reward-based Crowdfunding

Michael Wessel, Martin Adam, Alexander Benlian

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

To incentivize early contributions in reward-based crowdfunding, project creators frequently offer reward options in limited numbers, of which the “early bird” is one of the most prominent. Early birds offer the same rewards as an alternative option, but are reduced in price. Although studies suggest that scarcity can influence backers' decisions, research lacks knowledge of whether early bird options impact backers' decision-making once these options are sold out but still visible to potential contributors. Drawing on the phantom effect theory, this multi-method study investigates (1) how phantom alternatives impact backers' selections of available options, and (2) how the phantom effect interacts with different levels of discount and social proof. Our results from an online experiment with 512 participants and a longitudinal observational study based on 676 crowdfunding projects reveal that phantom options make backers choose the equivalent but undiscounted reward option more often. This effect is stronger with a moderate amount of discount for the early bird option rather than a high one. Moreover, social proof (i.e., number of backers who have chosen the early bird option) interacts with the discount amount in that higher levels of social proof weaken the relationship between the amount of discount and the phantom effect. These results show that, contrary to the traditional offline retail perspective, where sold-outs usually hurt sales, sold-out early birds may help in increasing funding revenues in reward-based crowdfunding, if employed strategically. Thus, we provide counterintuitive learnings for research as well as fundraisers looking for capital through reward-based crowdfunding.
To incentivize early contributions in reward-based crowdfunding, project creators frequently offer reward options in limited numbers, of which the “early bird” is one of the most prominent. Early birds offer the same rewards as an alternative option, but are reduced in price. Although studies suggest that scarcity can influence backers' decisions, research lacks knowledge of whether early bird options impact backers' decision-making once these options are sold out but still visible to potential contributors. Drawing on the phantom effect theory, this multi-method study investigates (1) how phantom alternatives impact backers' selections of available options, and (2) how the phantom effect interacts with different levels of discount and social proof. Our results from an online experiment with 512 participants and a longitudinal observational study based on 676 crowdfunding projects reveal that phantom options make backers choose the equivalent but undiscounted reward option more often. This effect is stronger with a moderate amount of discount for the early bird option rather than a high one. Moreover, social proof (i.e., number of backers who have chosen the early bird option) interacts with the discount amount in that higher levels of social proof weaken the relationship between the amount of discount and the phantom effect. These results show that, contrary to the traditional offline retail perspective, where sold-outs usually hurt sales, sold-out early birds may help in increasing funding revenues in reward-based crowdfunding, if employed strategically. Thus, we provide counterintuitive learnings for research as well as fundraisers looking for capital through reward-based crowdfunding.
LanguageEnglish
JournalDecision Support Systems
Volume117
Pages48-61
Number of pages14
ISSN0167-9236
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019

Bibliographical note

Published online: 13. December 2018

Keywords

  • Early bird offers
  • Stock-outs
  • Phantom effect
  • Social proof
  • Reward-based crowdfunding

Cite this

@article{c53f248039af467eb465c5af650ae2fe,
title = "The Impact of Sold-out Early Birds on Option Selection in Reward-based Crowdfunding",
abstract = "To incentivize early contributions in reward-based crowdfunding, project creators frequently offer reward options in limited numbers, of which the “early bird” is one of the most prominent. Early birds offer the same rewards as an alternative option, but are reduced in price. Although studies suggest that scarcity can influence backers' decisions, research lacks knowledge of whether early bird options impact backers' decision-making once these options are sold out but still visible to potential contributors. Drawing on the phantom effect theory, this multi-method study investigates (1) how phantom alternatives impact backers' selections of available options, and (2) how the phantom effect interacts with different levels of discount and social proof. Our results from an online experiment with 512 participants and a longitudinal observational study based on 676 crowdfunding projects reveal that phantom options make backers choose the equivalent but undiscounted reward option more often. This effect is stronger with a moderate amount of discount for the early bird option rather than a high one. Moreover, social proof (i.e., number of backers who have chosen the early bird option) interacts with the discount amount in that higher levels of social proof weaken the relationship between the amount of discount and the phantom effect. These results show that, contrary to the traditional offline retail perspective, where sold-outs usually hurt sales, sold-out early birds may help in increasing funding revenues in reward-based crowdfunding, if employed strategically. Thus, we provide counterintuitive learnings for research as well as fundraisers looking for capital through reward-based crowdfunding.",
keywords = "Early bird offers, Stock-outs, Phantom effect, Social proof, Reward-based crowdfunding, Early bird offers, Stock-outs, Phantom effect, Social proof, Reward-based crowdfunding",
author = "Michael Wessel and Martin Adam and Alexander Benlian",
note = "Published online: 13. December 2018",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.dss.2018.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "48--61",
journal = "Decision Support Systems",
issn = "0167-9236",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The Impact of Sold-out Early Birds on Option Selection in Reward-based Crowdfunding. / Wessel, Michael; Adam, Martin; Benlian, Alexander.

In: Decision Support Systems, Vol. 117, 02.2019, p. 48-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Impact of Sold-out Early Birds on Option Selection in Reward-based Crowdfunding

AU - Wessel,Michael

AU - Adam,Martin

AU - Benlian,Alexander

N1 - Published online: 13. December 2018

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - To incentivize early contributions in reward-based crowdfunding, project creators frequently offer reward options in limited numbers, of which the “early bird” is one of the most prominent. Early birds offer the same rewards as an alternative option, but are reduced in price. Although studies suggest that scarcity can influence backers' decisions, research lacks knowledge of whether early bird options impact backers' decision-making once these options are sold out but still visible to potential contributors. Drawing on the phantom effect theory, this multi-method study investigates (1) how phantom alternatives impact backers' selections of available options, and (2) how the phantom effect interacts with different levels of discount and social proof. Our results from an online experiment with 512 participants and a longitudinal observational study based on 676 crowdfunding projects reveal that phantom options make backers choose the equivalent but undiscounted reward option more often. This effect is stronger with a moderate amount of discount for the early bird option rather than a high one. Moreover, social proof (i.e., number of backers who have chosen the early bird option) interacts with the discount amount in that higher levels of social proof weaken the relationship between the amount of discount and the phantom effect. These results show that, contrary to the traditional offline retail perspective, where sold-outs usually hurt sales, sold-out early birds may help in increasing funding revenues in reward-based crowdfunding, if employed strategically. Thus, we provide counterintuitive learnings for research as well as fundraisers looking for capital through reward-based crowdfunding.

AB - To incentivize early contributions in reward-based crowdfunding, project creators frequently offer reward options in limited numbers, of which the “early bird” is one of the most prominent. Early birds offer the same rewards as an alternative option, but are reduced in price. Although studies suggest that scarcity can influence backers' decisions, research lacks knowledge of whether early bird options impact backers' decision-making once these options are sold out but still visible to potential contributors. Drawing on the phantom effect theory, this multi-method study investigates (1) how phantom alternatives impact backers' selections of available options, and (2) how the phantom effect interacts with different levels of discount and social proof. Our results from an online experiment with 512 participants and a longitudinal observational study based on 676 crowdfunding projects reveal that phantom options make backers choose the equivalent but undiscounted reward option more often. This effect is stronger with a moderate amount of discount for the early bird option rather than a high one. Moreover, social proof (i.e., number of backers who have chosen the early bird option) interacts with the discount amount in that higher levels of social proof weaken the relationship between the amount of discount and the phantom effect. These results show that, contrary to the traditional offline retail perspective, where sold-outs usually hurt sales, sold-out early birds may help in increasing funding revenues in reward-based crowdfunding, if employed strategically. Thus, we provide counterintuitive learnings for research as well as fundraisers looking for capital through reward-based crowdfunding.

KW - Early bird offers

KW - Stock-outs

KW - Phantom effect

KW - Social proof

KW - Reward-based crowdfunding

KW - Early bird offers

KW - Stock-outs

KW - Phantom effect

KW - Social proof

KW - Reward-based crowdfunding

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=954921376721&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1016/j.dss.2018.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.dss.2018.12.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 117

SP - 48

EP - 61

JO - Decision Support Systems

T2 - Decision Support Systems

JF - Decision Support Systems

SN - 0167-9236

ER -