The IB/ IHRM Interface: Exploring the Potential of Intersectional Theorizing

Ulf Andersson; Chris J. Brewster; Dana Minbaeva; Rajneesh Narula; Geoffrey T. Wood

doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2019.100998

The IB/ IHRM Interface: Exploring the Potential of Intersectional Theorizing

Ulf Andersson, Chris J. Brewster, Dana Minbaeva, Rajneesh Narula, Geoffrey T. Wood

Department of Strategy and Innovation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

179 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although the core concepts underlying IB and IHRM provide a common lexicon and epistemology, this commonality is often more implicit than explicit. We highlight not only the common ground but also the lack of critical dialogue between the two fields. This paper asks: What can each field learn from the other? What do scholars from IB learn from IHRM and vice versa? We identify a possible agenda and concerns regarding theory building as a basis for dialogue between the two fields.

Original language	English
Article number	100998
Journal	Journal of World Business
Volume	54
Issue number	5
Number of pages	8
ISSN	1090-9516
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.100998
Publication status	Published - Nov 2019

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 14. June 2019

Keywords

International business
International HRM
Multinational enterprise
Theory building

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jwb.2019.100998Licence: Unspecified

dana_minbaeva_et_al_the_IB_IHRM_interface_acceptedversionAccepted author manuscript, 1.29 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{9b601a8ad77c47abb41a83f84367bda9,

title = "The IB/ IHRM Interface: Exploring the Potential of Intersectional Theorizing",

abstract = "Although the core concepts underlying IB and IHRM provide a common lexicon and epistemology, this commonality is often more implicit than explicit. We highlight not only the common ground but also the lack of critical dialogue between the two fields. This paper asks: What can each field learn from the other? What do scholars from IB learn from IHRM and vice versa? We identify a possible agenda and concerns regarding theory building as a basis for dialogue between the two fields.",

keywords = "International business, International HRM, Multinational enterprise, Theory building, International business, International HRM, Multinational enterprise, Theory building",

author = "Ulf Andersson and Brewster, {Chris J.} and Dana Minbaeva and Rajneesh Narula and Wood, {Geoffrey T.}",

note = "Epub ahead of print. Published online: 14. June 2019",

year = "2019",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.jwb.2019.100998",

language = "English",

volume = "54",

journal = "Journal of World Business",

issn = "1090-9516",

publisher = "Pergamon Press",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The IB/ IHRM Interface

T2 - Exploring the Potential of Intersectional Theorizing

AU - Andersson, Ulf

AU - Brewster, Chris J.

AU - Minbaeva, Dana

AU - Narula, Rajneesh

AU - Wood, Geoffrey T.

N1 - Epub ahead of print. Published online: 14. June 2019

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - Although the core concepts underlying IB and IHRM provide a common lexicon and epistemology, this commonality is often more implicit than explicit. We highlight not only the common ground but also the lack of critical dialogue between the two fields. This paper asks: What can each field learn from the other? What do scholars from IB learn from IHRM and vice versa? We identify a possible agenda and concerns regarding theory building as a basis for dialogue between the two fields.

AB - Although the core concepts underlying IB and IHRM provide a common lexicon and epistemology, this commonality is often more implicit than explicit. We highlight not only the common ground but also the lack of critical dialogue between the two fields. This paper asks: What can each field learn from the other? What do scholars from IB learn from IHRM and vice versa? We identify a possible agenda and concerns regarding theory building as a basis for dialogue between the two fields.

KW - International business

KW - International HRM

KW - Multinational enterprise

KW - Theory building

KW - International business

KW - International HRM

KW - Multinational enterprise

KW - Theory building

U2 - 10.1016/j.jwb.2019.100998

DO - 10.1016/j.jwb.2019.100998

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1090-9516

VL - 54

JO - Journal of World Business

JF - Journal of World Business

IS - 5

M1 - 100998

ER -