TY - JOUR
T1 - The EU's Work-life Balance Directive
T2 - Institutional Change of Father-specific Leave across Member States
AU - de la Porte, Caroline
AU - Im, Zhen Jie
AU - Pircher, Brigitte
AU - Szelewa, Dorota
N1 - Published online: 5 May 2023
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - This paper examines institutional change in father-specific leave - a centre-piece of the EU's work-life balance directive (WLBD) - from the perspective of gradual institutional change. The WLBD, a highly contentious directive, represents a litmus test for the possible impact of the European pillar of social rights (EPSR), on welfare state institutions, which are responsible for the organisation, financing and delivery of social rights in member states. The analysis comprises in-depth case studies in Denmark, Germany, France and Poland, with different combinations of family and parental leave policies prior to the WLBD. The findings reveal that the EU's directive is leading to convergence in paternity leave, but to divergence in parental leave. Our study is important because it shows that even if EU directives in social policy in principle can lead to upwards social convergence across the EU, when they are relatively weak in terms of precise constraint, for instance, for the level of remuneration for leave, this leads to differentiated integration. This could undermine the very purpose of the EPSR, which seeks to improve social rights for all citizens across the EU. Similar dynamics are likely to be present in other areas at the welfare state-labor market nexus, such as minimum wages or platform work, where the EU is also developing regulation under the auspices of the EPSR.
AB - This paper examines institutional change in father-specific leave - a centre-piece of the EU's work-life balance directive (WLBD) - from the perspective of gradual institutional change. The WLBD, a highly contentious directive, represents a litmus test for the possible impact of the European pillar of social rights (EPSR), on welfare state institutions, which are responsible for the organisation, financing and delivery of social rights in member states. The analysis comprises in-depth case studies in Denmark, Germany, France and Poland, with different combinations of family and parental leave policies prior to the WLBD. The findings reveal that the EU's directive is leading to convergence in paternity leave, but to divergence in parental leave. Our study is important because it shows that even if EU directives in social policy in principle can lead to upwards social convergence across the EU, when they are relatively weak in terms of precise constraint, for instance, for the level of remuneration for leave, this leads to differentiated integration. This could undermine the very purpose of the EPSR, which seeks to improve social rights for all citizens across the EU. Similar dynamics are likely to be present in other areas at the welfare state-labor market nexus, such as minimum wages or platform work, where the EU is also developing regulation under the auspices of the EPSR.
KW - Denmark
KW - Earmarked parental leave
KW - EU social policy
KW - European pillar of social rights
KW - Father-specific leave
KW - France
KW - Germany
KW - Gradual institutional change
KW - Paternity leave
KW - Poland
KW - Work-life balance
KW - Denmark
KW - Earmarked parental leave
KW - EU social policy
KW - European pillar of social rights
KW - Father-specific leave
KW - France
KW - Germany
KW - Gradual institutional change
KW - Paternity leave
KW - Poland
KW - Work-life balance
U2 - 10.1111/spol.12920
DO - 10.1111/spol.12920
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0144-5596
VL - 57
SP - 549
EP - 563
JO - Social Policy & Administration
JF - Social Policy & Administration
IS - 4
ER -