The Endogenous Origins of Experience, Routines and Organizational Capabilities

The Poverty of Stimulus

Nicolai Juul Foss, Teppo Felin

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this paper we discuss the origins and emergence of organizational routines and capabilities. We first argue that there are theoretical and endogeneity-related concerns associated with the key antecedents and mechanisms specified by the extant routines and capabilities literature. Specifically, we explicate the behaviorist and empiricist foundations of the organizational routines and capabilities literature and the extant emphasis placed on experience, repetition, and observation as the key antecedents and mechanisms of routines and capabilities. Based on this discussion we highlight several, endogeneity-related concerns, namely: (1) the problem of origins and causation, (2) the problem of extremes, (3) the problem of intentionality, (4) the problem of new knowledge, and (5) the problem of the environment. We introduce the ‘poverty of stimulus’ argument and discuss how an internalist or rationalist, choice-based approach can provide a more fruitful (though preliminary) foundation for understanding organizational behavior and capabilities.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Institutional Economics
    Volume7
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)231-256
    ISSN1744-1374
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Cite this

    @article{c07a5407ac45442a97cfb46c54e90419,
    title = "The Endogenous Origins of Experience, Routines and Organizational Capabilities: The Poverty of Stimulus",
    abstract = "In this paper we discuss the origins and emergence of organizational routines and capabilities. We first argue that there are theoretical and endogeneity-related concerns associated with the key antecedents and mechanisms specified by the extant routines and capabilities literature. Specifically, we explicate the behaviorist and empiricist foundations of the organizational routines and capabilities literature and the extant emphasis placed on experience, repetition, and observation as the key antecedents and mechanisms of routines and capabilities. Based on this discussion we highlight several, endogeneity-related concerns, namely: (1) the problem of origins and causation, (2) the problem of extremes, (3) the problem of intentionality, (4) the problem of new knowledge, and (5) the problem of the environment. We introduce the ‘poverty of stimulus’ argument and discuss how an internalist or rationalist, choice-based approach can provide a more fruitful (though preliminary) foundation for understanding organizational behavior and capabilities.",
    author = "Foss, {Nicolai Juul} and Teppo Felin",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1017/S1744137410000214",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "231--256",
    journal = "Journal of Institutional Economics",
    issn = "1744-1374",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "2",

    }

    The Endogenous Origins of Experience, Routines and Organizational Capabilities : The Poverty of Stimulus. / Foss, Nicolai Juul; Felin, Teppo.

    In: Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2011, p. 231-256.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Endogenous Origins of Experience, Routines and Organizational Capabilities

    T2 - The Poverty of Stimulus

    AU - Foss, Nicolai Juul

    AU - Felin, Teppo

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - In this paper we discuss the origins and emergence of organizational routines and capabilities. We first argue that there are theoretical and endogeneity-related concerns associated with the key antecedents and mechanisms specified by the extant routines and capabilities literature. Specifically, we explicate the behaviorist and empiricist foundations of the organizational routines and capabilities literature and the extant emphasis placed on experience, repetition, and observation as the key antecedents and mechanisms of routines and capabilities. Based on this discussion we highlight several, endogeneity-related concerns, namely: (1) the problem of origins and causation, (2) the problem of extremes, (3) the problem of intentionality, (4) the problem of new knowledge, and (5) the problem of the environment. We introduce the ‘poverty of stimulus’ argument and discuss how an internalist or rationalist, choice-based approach can provide a more fruitful (though preliminary) foundation for understanding organizational behavior and capabilities.

    AB - In this paper we discuss the origins and emergence of organizational routines and capabilities. We first argue that there are theoretical and endogeneity-related concerns associated with the key antecedents and mechanisms specified by the extant routines and capabilities literature. Specifically, we explicate the behaviorist and empiricist foundations of the organizational routines and capabilities literature and the extant emphasis placed on experience, repetition, and observation as the key antecedents and mechanisms of routines and capabilities. Based on this discussion we highlight several, endogeneity-related concerns, namely: (1) the problem of origins and causation, (2) the problem of extremes, (3) the problem of intentionality, (4) the problem of new knowledge, and (5) the problem of the environment. We introduce the ‘poverty of stimulus’ argument and discuss how an internalist or rationalist, choice-based approach can provide a more fruitful (though preliminary) foundation for understanding organizational behavior and capabilities.

    U2 - 10.1017/S1744137410000214

    DO - 10.1017/S1744137410000214

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 7

    SP - 231

    EP - 256

    JO - Journal of Institutional Economics

    JF - Journal of Institutional Economics

    SN - 1744-1374

    IS - 2

    ER -