The End of Trade and Investment Law as We Know it

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Trade and investment law (TIL) does not operate in a vacuum. A rethinking of TIL can only be done on the basis of an understanding of the structural composition and direction world society is taking. Both orthodox and heterodox TIL relies on assumptions concerning the state of the world and the driving forces behind it which needs to be subject to scrutiny and substantial rethinking. The core paradox we are dealing with when seeking to rethink TIL is that increased globalization has implied an increase rather a decrease in global diversity. A future oriented TIL therefore need to be thought of in the plural and not in the singular as it is likely to fragment into a number of regional TIL regimes based on very different philosophies and institutional setups. The very idea of rethinking TIL is therefore in the need of a rethink. The core element needed for a rethinking of TIL is however beyond the control of lawyers. The hegemony of the legal discipline has been broken and the economics discipline now rules the world. Without a fundamental change to the status and internal composition of the economics discipline the endeavor to rethink TIL is likely to be futile.
Trade and investment law (TIL) does not operate in a vacuum. A rethinking of TIL can only be done on the basis of an understanding of the structural composition and direction world society is taking. Both orthodox and heterodox TIL relies on assumptions concerning the state of the world and the driving forces behind it which needs to be subject to scrutiny and substantial rethinking. The core paradox we are dealing with when seeking to rethink TIL is that increased globalization has implied an increase rather a decrease in global diversity. A future oriented TIL therefore need to be thought of in the plural and not in the singular as it is likely to fragment into a number of regional TIL regimes based on very different philosophies and institutional setups. The very idea of rethinking TIL is therefore in the need of a rethink. The core element needed for a rethinking of TIL is however beyond the control of lawyers. The hegemony of the legal discipline has been broken and the economics discipline now rules the world. Without a fundamental change to the status and internal composition of the economics discipline the endeavor to rethink TIL is likely to be futile.

Conference

ConferenceRethinking Trade and Investment Law
LocationHarvard Law School
CountryUnited States
CityCambridge, MA
Period13/04/201814/04/2018

Bibliographical note

CBS Library does not have access to the material

Cite this

Kjær, P. F. (2018). The End of Trade and Investment Law as We Know it. Paper presented at Rethinking Trade and Investment Law, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Kjær, Poul F./ The End of Trade and Investment Law as We Know it. Paper presented at Rethinking Trade and Investment Law, Cambridge, MA, United States.7 p.
@conference{012c52aa1805406096f66a4d6a792cb3,
title = "The End of Trade and Investment Law as We Know it",
abstract = "Trade and investment law (TIL) does not operate in a vacuum. A rethinking of TIL can only be done on the basis of an understanding of the structural composition and direction world society is taking. Both orthodox and heterodox TIL relies on assumptions concerning the state of the world and the driving forces behind it which needs to be subject to scrutiny and substantial rethinking. The core paradox we are dealing with when seeking to rethink TIL is that increased globalization has implied an increase rather a decrease in global diversity. A future oriented TIL therefore need to be thought of in the plural and not in the singular as it is likely to fragment into a number of regional TIL regimes based on very different philosophies and institutional setups. The very idea of rethinking TIL is therefore in the need of a rethink. The core element needed for a rethinking of TIL is however beyond the control of lawyers. The hegemony of the legal discipline has been broken and the economics discipline now rules the world. Without a fundamental change to the status and internal composition of the economics discipline the endeavor to rethink TIL is likely to be futile.",
author = "Kj{\ae}r, {Poul F.}",
note = "CBS Library does not have access to the material; null ; Conference date: 13-04-2018 Through 14-04-2018",
year = "2018",
language = "English",

}

Kjær, PF 2018, 'The End of Trade and Investment Law as We Know it' Paper presented at, Cambridge, MA, United States, 13/04/2018 - 14/04/2018, .

The End of Trade and Investment Law as We Know it. / Kjær, Poul F.

2018. Paper presented at Rethinking Trade and Investment Law, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - The End of Trade and Investment Law as We Know it

AU - Kjær,Poul F.

N1 - CBS Library does not have access to the material

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Trade and investment law (TIL) does not operate in a vacuum. A rethinking of TIL can only be done on the basis of an understanding of the structural composition and direction world society is taking. Both orthodox and heterodox TIL relies on assumptions concerning the state of the world and the driving forces behind it which needs to be subject to scrutiny and substantial rethinking. The core paradox we are dealing with when seeking to rethink TIL is that increased globalization has implied an increase rather a decrease in global diversity. A future oriented TIL therefore need to be thought of in the plural and not in the singular as it is likely to fragment into a number of regional TIL regimes based on very different philosophies and institutional setups. The very idea of rethinking TIL is therefore in the need of a rethink. The core element needed for a rethinking of TIL is however beyond the control of lawyers. The hegemony of the legal discipline has been broken and the economics discipline now rules the world. Without a fundamental change to the status and internal composition of the economics discipline the endeavor to rethink TIL is likely to be futile.

AB - Trade and investment law (TIL) does not operate in a vacuum. A rethinking of TIL can only be done on the basis of an understanding of the structural composition and direction world society is taking. Both orthodox and heterodox TIL relies on assumptions concerning the state of the world and the driving forces behind it which needs to be subject to scrutiny and substantial rethinking. The core paradox we are dealing with when seeking to rethink TIL is that increased globalization has implied an increase rather a decrease in global diversity. A future oriented TIL therefore need to be thought of in the plural and not in the singular as it is likely to fragment into a number of regional TIL regimes based on very different philosophies and institutional setups. The very idea of rethinking TIL is therefore in the need of a rethink. The core element needed for a rethinking of TIL is however beyond the control of lawyers. The hegemony of the legal discipline has been broken and the economics discipline now rules the world. Without a fundamental change to the status and internal composition of the economics discipline the endeavor to rethink TIL is likely to be futile.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Kjær PF. The End of Trade and Investment Law as We Know it. 2018. Paper presented at Rethinking Trade and Investment Law, Cambridge, MA, United States.