The Electoral Implications of Coalition Policy Making

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review


Coalition governance requires parties to come to collective policy decisions while simultaneously competing for votes. This reality has inspired a vibrant literature on coalition policy making, which is focused on legislative organization and behavior, though it is not clear how it affects the electorate. This article addresses this gap in the literature by examining how voters’ perceptions of compromise in coalition policy making affect their vote choices. Analyzing data from six parliamentary democracies where multiparty governance is the norm, it finds that voters punish parties they view as compromising. More specifically, voters are found to discount the policy accomplishments and policy promises of compromising parties, and that this tendency is more pronounced among previous incumbent cabinet supporters and the politically disinterested. These findings have important implications for the study of voting as well as coalition policy making.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)59-80
Number of pages22
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019
Externally publishedYes


  • Coalition politics
  • Policy making
  • Voter perceptions

Cite this