The Dilemma of Centres of Excellence: Contextual Creation of Knowledge Versus Global Transfer of Knowledge

Ulf Holm, Torben Pedersen

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    5 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    A common understanding in recent literature on the development of multinational corporations (MNCs) and headquarters-subsidiary relations is that some subsidiaries will have, or ought to have, a strategic role in the global organization that reaches beyond their local undertakings. This notion implies that MNC competitive advantage depends on the ability of several corporate units to assimilate and make use of knowledge created in other business contexts than their own. Hence, an MNC subsidiary must adapt and commit to the local environment in order to survive in the market competition. On the other hand, corporate sister units’ usage of subsidiary knowledge implies that the subsidiary also must adapt and commit within the corporate environment. The dilemma here lies in the extent to which the subsidiary’s external market environment and its corporate environment are separated (or integrated) systems in terms of connections between resources and activities and knowledge development. In this paper, we will reveal empirical findings from an international project on the occurrence of strategic subsidiaries - denoted Centres of Excellence (CoE) - in MNCs. We also investigate if CoEs play an influential role over corporate decisions on investments. Our investigation reflects the extent to which the subsidiary competencies are of context-specific nature or if they affect other parts of the MNC. The paper also discusses and presents case-examples of how the subsidiary can retain its uniqueness and sustain as a CoE even if it continues to transfer knowledge to other parts of the MNC.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of PublicationCopenhagen
    PublisherDepartment of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School
    Number of pages23
    Publication statusPublished - 2000
    SeriesWorking Paper / Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School
    Number8-2000

    Cite this

    Holm, U., & Pedersen, T. (2000). The Dilemma of Centres of Excellence: Contextual Creation of Knowledge Versus Global Transfer of Knowledge. Copenhagen: Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School. Working Paper / Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School, No. 8-2000
    Holm, Ulf ; Pedersen, Torben. / The Dilemma of Centres of Excellence : Contextual Creation of Knowledge Versus Global Transfer of Knowledge. Copenhagen : Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School, 2000. (Working Paper / Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School; No. 8-2000).
    @techreport{fbf46d90c02311db9769000ea68e967b,
    title = "The Dilemma of Centres of Excellence: Contextual Creation of Knowledge Versus Global Transfer of Knowledge",
    abstract = "A common understanding in recent literature on the development of multinational corporations (MNCs) and headquarters-subsidiary relations is that some subsidiaries will have, or ought to have, a strategic role in the global organization that reaches beyond their local undertakings. This notion implies that MNC competitive advantage depends on the ability of several corporate units to assimilate and make use of knowledge created in other business contexts than their own. Hence, an MNC subsidiary must adapt and commit to the local environment in order to survive in the market competition. On the other hand, corporate sister units’ usage of subsidiary knowledge implies that the subsidiary also must adapt and commit within the corporate environment. The dilemma here lies in the extent to which the subsidiary’s external market environment and its corporate environment are separated (or integrated) systems in terms of connections between resources and activities and knowledge development. In this paper, we will reveal empirical findings from an international project on the occurrence of strategic subsidiaries - denoted Centres of Excellence (CoE) - in MNCs. We also investigate if CoEs play an influential role over corporate decisions on investments. Our investigation reflects the extent to which the subsidiary competencies are of context-specific nature or if they affect other parts of the MNC. The paper also discusses and presents case-examples of how the subsidiary can retain its uniqueness and sustain as a CoE even if it continues to transfer knowledge to other parts of the MNC.",
    keywords = "Videnoverf{\o}rsel, Videnledelse",
    author = "Ulf Holm and Torben Pedersen",
    year = "2000",
    language = "English",
    series = "Working Paper / Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School",
    publisher = "Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School",
    number = "8-2000",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School",

    }

    Holm, U & Pedersen, T 2000 'The Dilemma of Centres of Excellence: Contextual Creation of Knowledge Versus Global Transfer of Knowledge' Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.

    The Dilemma of Centres of Excellence : Contextual Creation of Knowledge Versus Global Transfer of Knowledge. / Holm, Ulf; Pedersen, Torben.

    Copenhagen : Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School, 2000.

    Research output: Working paperResearch

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - The Dilemma of Centres of Excellence

    T2 - Contextual Creation of Knowledge Versus Global Transfer of Knowledge

    AU - Holm, Ulf

    AU - Pedersen, Torben

    PY - 2000

    Y1 - 2000

    N2 - A common understanding in recent literature on the development of multinational corporations (MNCs) and headquarters-subsidiary relations is that some subsidiaries will have, or ought to have, a strategic role in the global organization that reaches beyond their local undertakings. This notion implies that MNC competitive advantage depends on the ability of several corporate units to assimilate and make use of knowledge created in other business contexts than their own. Hence, an MNC subsidiary must adapt and commit to the local environment in order to survive in the market competition. On the other hand, corporate sister units’ usage of subsidiary knowledge implies that the subsidiary also must adapt and commit within the corporate environment. The dilemma here lies in the extent to which the subsidiary’s external market environment and its corporate environment are separated (or integrated) systems in terms of connections between resources and activities and knowledge development. In this paper, we will reveal empirical findings from an international project on the occurrence of strategic subsidiaries - denoted Centres of Excellence (CoE) - in MNCs. We also investigate if CoEs play an influential role over corporate decisions on investments. Our investigation reflects the extent to which the subsidiary competencies are of context-specific nature or if they affect other parts of the MNC. The paper also discusses and presents case-examples of how the subsidiary can retain its uniqueness and sustain as a CoE even if it continues to transfer knowledge to other parts of the MNC.

    AB - A common understanding in recent literature on the development of multinational corporations (MNCs) and headquarters-subsidiary relations is that some subsidiaries will have, or ought to have, a strategic role in the global organization that reaches beyond their local undertakings. This notion implies that MNC competitive advantage depends on the ability of several corporate units to assimilate and make use of knowledge created in other business contexts than their own. Hence, an MNC subsidiary must adapt and commit to the local environment in order to survive in the market competition. On the other hand, corporate sister units’ usage of subsidiary knowledge implies that the subsidiary also must adapt and commit within the corporate environment. The dilemma here lies in the extent to which the subsidiary’s external market environment and its corporate environment are separated (or integrated) systems in terms of connections between resources and activities and knowledge development. In this paper, we will reveal empirical findings from an international project on the occurrence of strategic subsidiaries - denoted Centres of Excellence (CoE) - in MNCs. We also investigate if CoEs play an influential role over corporate decisions on investments. Our investigation reflects the extent to which the subsidiary competencies are of context-specific nature or if they affect other parts of the MNC. The paper also discusses and presents case-examples of how the subsidiary can retain its uniqueness and sustain as a CoE even if it continues to transfer knowledge to other parts of the MNC.

    KW - Videnoverførsel

    KW - Videnledelse

    M3 - Working paper

    T3 - Working Paper / Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School

    BT - The Dilemma of Centres of Excellence

    PB - Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School

    CY - Copenhagen

    ER -

    Holm U, Pedersen T. The Dilemma of Centres of Excellence: Contextual Creation of Knowledge Versus Global Transfer of Knowledge. Copenhagen: Department of International Economics and Management, Copenhagen Business School. 2000.