The Dark Side of Stakeholder Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility

Tensions and Micro‐level Undesirable Outcomes

François Maon, Joëlle Vanhamme, Kenneth De Roeck, Adam Lindgreen, Valérie Swaen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

With a review of literature on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its micro‐level impacts, this paper proposes an integrative framework to map undesirable relational outcomes of CSR activities on internal (employees) and external (customers) stakeholders. By adopting a paradox‐based perspective, the authors determine that unexpected, adverse stakeholder reactions to CSR are driven primarily by either performing or belonging tensions, related to exchange‐ and identity‐based stakeholder concerns, respectively. Specifically, contextual and personal influences can trigger and explain undesirable relational outcomes of CSR. On this basis, this paper offers a research agenda for developing a more refined understanding of CSR‐related tensions and a more nuanced perspective on the business case for CSR.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Management Reviews
Volume21
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)209–230
Number of pages22
ISSN1460-8545
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

@article{6c2a5ecee36b4a8ab6d7148a85d3501a,
title = "The Dark Side of Stakeholder Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: Tensions and Micro‐level Undesirable Outcomes",
abstract = "With a review of literature on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its micro‐level impacts, this paper proposes an integrative framework to map undesirable relational outcomes of CSR activities on internal (employees) and external (customers) stakeholders. By adopting a paradox‐based perspective, the authors determine that unexpected, adverse stakeholder reactions to CSR are driven primarily by either performing or belonging tensions, related to exchange‐ and identity‐based stakeholder concerns, respectively. Specifically, contextual and personal influences can trigger and explain undesirable relational outcomes of CSR. On this basis, this paper offers a research agenda for developing a more refined understanding of CSR‐related tensions and a more nuanced perspective on the business case for CSR.",
author = "Fran{\cc}ois Maon and Jo{\"e}lle Vanhamme and {De Roeck}, Kenneth and Adam Lindgreen and Val{\'e}rie Swaen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/ijmr.12198",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "209–230",
journal = "International Journal of Management Reviews",
issn = "1460-8545",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "2",

}

The Dark Side of Stakeholder Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility : Tensions and Micro‐level Undesirable Outcomes. / Maon, François; Vanhamme, Joëlle; De Roeck, Kenneth; Lindgreen, Adam; Swaen, Valérie.

In: International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2019, p. 209–230.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Dark Side of Stakeholder Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility

T2 - Tensions and Micro‐level Undesirable Outcomes

AU - Maon, François

AU - Vanhamme, Joëlle

AU - De Roeck, Kenneth

AU - Lindgreen, Adam

AU - Swaen, Valérie

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - With a review of literature on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its micro‐level impacts, this paper proposes an integrative framework to map undesirable relational outcomes of CSR activities on internal (employees) and external (customers) stakeholders. By adopting a paradox‐based perspective, the authors determine that unexpected, adverse stakeholder reactions to CSR are driven primarily by either performing or belonging tensions, related to exchange‐ and identity‐based stakeholder concerns, respectively. Specifically, contextual and personal influences can trigger and explain undesirable relational outcomes of CSR. On this basis, this paper offers a research agenda for developing a more refined understanding of CSR‐related tensions and a more nuanced perspective on the business case for CSR.

AB - With a review of literature on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its micro‐level impacts, this paper proposes an integrative framework to map undesirable relational outcomes of CSR activities on internal (employees) and external (customers) stakeholders. By adopting a paradox‐based perspective, the authors determine that unexpected, adverse stakeholder reactions to CSR are driven primarily by either performing or belonging tensions, related to exchange‐ and identity‐based stakeholder concerns, respectively. Specifically, contextual and personal influences can trigger and explain undesirable relational outcomes of CSR. On this basis, this paper offers a research agenda for developing a more refined understanding of CSR‐related tensions and a more nuanced perspective on the business case for CSR.

UR - https://sfx-45cbs.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/45cbs?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:azlist&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017835280&rft.object_portfolio_id=&svc.holdings=yes&svc.fulltext=yes

U2 - 10.1111/ijmr.12198

DO - 10.1111/ijmr.12198

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 209

EP - 230

JO - International Journal of Management Reviews

JF - International Journal of Management Reviews

SN - 1460-8545

IS - 2

ER -