@techreport{03c6f6d5196e4712aa35692bf2809004,
title = "The Co-holding Puzzle: New Evidence from Transaction-level Data",
abstract = "Using detailed and highly-disaggregated data on spending, income, bank account balances, and consumer credit, we examine the tendency of individuals to {"}co-hold{"}, i.e., to simultaneously hold low-interest liquid deposit balances and high-interest debt in the form of overdrafts. The disaggregated nature of the data allows us to calculate co-holding at daily frequency, while prior studies have relied on more aggregated measures. Daily measures reveal that co-holding is less common than these prior studies have documented, occurring on approximately 15% of individual {\~A}? days in our baseline calculations. Most spells of co-holding are also short, lasting less than one calendar month. The detailed data allow us to examine the empirical relevance of the competing explanations for co-holding. When brought to the data, we find that co-holding appears to be driven by behavioral rather than rational forces. More specifically, we find evidence in support of explanations for co-holding based upon mental accounting while we find rational explanations for co-holding to be empirically much less relevant.",
keywords = "Co-holding, Credit card puzzle, Household finance, Co-holding, Credit card puzzle, Household finance",
author = "Arna Olafsson and John Gathergood",
year = "2020",
language = "English",
series = "Centre for Economic Policy Research. Discussion Papers",
publisher = "Centre for Economic Policy Research",
number = "DP14799",
address = "United Kingdom",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Centre for Economic Policy Research",
}