The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush: Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure

Agnieszka Nowinska, Kristina Vaarst Andersen, Mark Lorenzen

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores labor market mechanisms of intra-professional status change following fast organizational failure. We undertake a case study of a collapsed high-profile bunker oil company, selected on account of its failure’s scale, speed, and organizational and geographical heterogeneity. Using unique hand-collected qualitative and quantitative data, we examine the careers of the organization’s displaced employees. At odds with extant theory on stigma, we do not find any general status loss. We explain this by the fast decline and aftermath after bankruptcy of this particular organization, allowing insufficient time for a stigmatization mechanism. We find that displaced employees most prone to status loss are those having worked organizationally and geographically proximately to the locus of the organization’s failure. We suggest that in lieu of stigma, status change is driven by a mechanism of blame, i.e. perceived culpability of those displaced employees with comparatively strong association to organizational failure. Comparing this new theoretical notion with the extant notion of stigma, we suggest that while both are mechanisms compensating for imperfect information, stigma entails weaker association to failure and hence "taints with a broader brush" compared to blame’s "pointed brush".
Original languageEnglish
Publication date2018
Number of pages27
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventDRUID18 Conference - Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
Duration: 11 Jun 201813 Jun 2018
Conference number: 40
https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=57

Conference

ConferenceDRUID18 Conference
Number40
LocationCopenhagen Business School
CountryDenmark
CityFrederiksberg
Period11/06/201813/06/2018
Internet address

Cite this

Nowinska, A., Vaarst Andersen, K., & Lorenzen, M. (2018). The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush: Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure. Paper presented at DRUID18 Conference, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Nowinska, Agnieszka ; Vaarst Andersen, Kristina ; Lorenzen, Mark. / The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush : Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure. Paper presented at DRUID18 Conference, Frederiksberg, Denmark.27 p.
@conference{76504a21d16844e4a87ed11443f5e896,
title = "The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush: Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure",
abstract = "This paper explores labor market mechanisms of intra-professional status change following fast organizational failure. We undertake a case study of a collapsed high-profile bunker oil company, selected on account of its failure’s scale, speed, and organizational and geographical heterogeneity. Using unique hand-collected qualitative and quantitative data, we examine the careers of the organization’s displaced employees. At odds with extant theory on stigma, we do not find any general status loss. We explain this by the fast decline and aftermath after bankruptcy of this particular organization, allowing insufficient time for a stigmatization mechanism. We find that displaced employees most prone to status loss are those having worked organizationally and geographically proximately to the locus of the organization’s failure. We suggest that in lieu of stigma, status change is driven by a mechanism of blame, i.e. perceived culpability of those displaced employees with comparatively strong association to organizational failure. Comparing this new theoretical notion with the extant notion of stigma, we suggest that while both are mechanisms compensating for imperfect information, stigma entails weaker association to failure and hence {"}taints with a broader brush{"} compared to blame’s {"}pointed brush{"}.",
author = "Agnieszka Nowinska and {Vaarst Andersen}, Kristina and Mark Lorenzen",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
note = "null ; Conference date: 11-06-2018 Through 13-06-2018",
url = "https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=57",

}

Nowinska, A, Vaarst Andersen, K & Lorenzen, M 2018, 'The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush: Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure' Paper presented at, Frederiksberg, Denmark, 11/06/2018 - 13/06/2018, .

The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush : Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure. / Nowinska, Agnieszka; Vaarst Andersen, Kristina; Lorenzen, Mark.

2018. Paper presented at DRUID18 Conference, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush

T2 - Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure

AU - Nowinska, Agnieszka

AU - Vaarst Andersen, Kristina

AU - Lorenzen, Mark

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This paper explores labor market mechanisms of intra-professional status change following fast organizational failure. We undertake a case study of a collapsed high-profile bunker oil company, selected on account of its failure’s scale, speed, and organizational and geographical heterogeneity. Using unique hand-collected qualitative and quantitative data, we examine the careers of the organization’s displaced employees. At odds with extant theory on stigma, we do not find any general status loss. We explain this by the fast decline and aftermath after bankruptcy of this particular organization, allowing insufficient time for a stigmatization mechanism. We find that displaced employees most prone to status loss are those having worked organizationally and geographically proximately to the locus of the organization’s failure. We suggest that in lieu of stigma, status change is driven by a mechanism of blame, i.e. perceived culpability of those displaced employees with comparatively strong association to organizational failure. Comparing this new theoretical notion with the extant notion of stigma, we suggest that while both are mechanisms compensating for imperfect information, stigma entails weaker association to failure and hence "taints with a broader brush" compared to blame’s "pointed brush".

AB - This paper explores labor market mechanisms of intra-professional status change following fast organizational failure. We undertake a case study of a collapsed high-profile bunker oil company, selected on account of its failure’s scale, speed, and organizational and geographical heterogeneity. Using unique hand-collected qualitative and quantitative data, we examine the careers of the organization’s displaced employees. At odds with extant theory on stigma, we do not find any general status loss. We explain this by the fast decline and aftermath after bankruptcy of this particular organization, allowing insufficient time for a stigmatization mechanism. We find that displaced employees most prone to status loss are those having worked organizationally and geographically proximately to the locus of the organization’s failure. We suggest that in lieu of stigma, status change is driven by a mechanism of blame, i.e. perceived culpability of those displaced employees with comparatively strong association to organizational failure. Comparing this new theoretical notion with the extant notion of stigma, we suggest that while both are mechanisms compensating for imperfect information, stigma entails weaker association to failure and hence "taints with a broader brush" compared to blame’s "pointed brush".

M3 - Paper

ER -

Nowinska A, Vaarst Andersen K, Lorenzen M. The Broad vs. the Pointed Brush: Status Change, Stigma and Blame Following Fast Organizational Failure. 2018. Paper presented at DRUID18 Conference, Frederiksberg, Denmark.