The Benefits and Attractiveness of Local Theatres: Comedy or Shakespeare – Does It Matter?

Trine Bille*, Hanna Nyborg Storm

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In most countries, cultural institutions are heavily supported by public funds. In the literature, this is explained by expected externalities, meaning that not only users, but also non-users benefit from the existence of cultural institutions. However, there is little knowledge about what these externalities consist of, and how they relate to the characteristics of the supply. The main aim of this study is to investigate the perceived benefits of theatres serving the local community, and whether the type of theatre matters. Using data from a large-scale survey conducted in Denmark in the spring of 2020, we find that the type of theatre has a significant impact on the values perceived by the users, while non-users show no preferences for the types of theatre located in the municipality. Therefore, we conclude that non-users have little understanding of the externalities provided, and the type of supply is of no consequence for non-users’ valuation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCultural Trends
Number of pages20
ISSN0954-8963
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Epub ahead of print. Published online: 4 June 2024.

Keywords

  • Performing arts
  • Non-market benefits
  • Externalities
  • Attractiveness
  • Non users
  • Willingness-to-pay

Cite this